Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That's terrible. <snark> Was the iPhone 6 faster than glacial after upgrading? ;) </snark>
I own a 6+ purchased 4 months after release, and opening the wallet took 3 seconds, maps took 5 seconds. Original battery, before and after powering the phone off then back on.

That’s the secret that a lot of people don’t want to admit. The iPhone 6, especially Plus, was underpowered from day one. It was barely more powerful in terms of SoC than the 5S, has the same amount of RAM, and pushes a lot more pixels.
 
In reality, even a four-year-old iPhone 6 being throttled by Apple's performance management shouldn't be nearly as slow as Samsung depicts in the ad. And if it is, then there are likely underlying issues.
Joe, what is wrong with you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dj64Mk7
Everyone who is saying about the lack of Android updates is failing to realize that most of the new features people on the forum want (minus security updates) can be introduced with an update to Google Play Services. This ability is due to the fact that the OS is, for the most part, modularized. And now, with Project Treble, even OS core services not covered by GPS can be updated modularly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Regime2008
Both Apple and Samsung need to find better ad agencies. Their recent ads are pretty sad.
 
In reality, even a four-year-old iPhone 6 being throttled by Apple's performance management shouldn't be nearly as slow as Samsung depicts in the ad. And if it is, then there are likely underlying issues.

I'm surprised that a spokesperson from MacRumors has expressed such bias; usually, MacRumors stays impartial. I completely disagree with this opinion — the iPhone 6 has a design flaw that I will describe below, that the competing Samsung S5 did not have.

I had my battery replaced in my iPhone 6 a few months ago, and it's still very slow in precisely the unexaggerated way that the Samsung ad depicts. The cause? Not enough RAM (only 1GB???) operating a modern operating system. I have a 64GB iPhone 6 with 19GB of free space, so there's really no reason other than RAM for the slowness of my phone.

Samsung S5 has 2GB RAM [early 2014]
iPhone 6 has 1GB RAM [late 2014]

Samsung S6 has 3GB RAM [early 2015]
iPhone 6S has 2GB RAM [late 2015]

Samsung S7 has 4GB RAM [early 2016]
iPhone 7 has 2GB RAM [late 2016]

Samsung S8 has 4GB RAM [early 2017]
iPhone 8 has 2GB RAM [late 2017]
iPhone X has 3GB RAM [late 2017]

Please take note! The current iPhone 8 of late 2017 has *the same* amount of RAM as the Samsung S5 from early 2014. No wonder Samsung phones are faster.

Samsung phones have always been prepared for future operating systems, thus avoiding slowdowns since at least 2014. Apple's phones have consistently been released after Samsung, and are consistently under-specced in terms of RAM. Apple is being cheap, probably under the false guise of "more RAM uses more battery".

tl;dr: Samsung's ad showcases a very-real problem with Apple's slow phones that Samsung phones don't have in comparison.

I love iPhone, but Apple really needs to lift their game for a company that neglects their macOS to obsess about iOS. If Apple's upcoming 2018 iPhones this year still have 2GB of RAM, well, I guess I'll wait another year before I upgrade.
[doublepost=1526712576][/doublepost]
That is not accurate. It is as bad as Samsung portrays. The wife used my old 6+ for a week while we waited for parts for her battery repair for her 6s to come in (I messed up the tape that came in the kit). She commented how slow that phone was. Almost to the point that she said she did nothing other than phone calls and texts. That throttling is BS and really, really bad.

I pull out the old Galaxy S5 from time to time as it's the spare phone now. It's slow but nowhere near as bad as the iPhone. Need to get it to Apple for a $29 battery and sell it.

Thank you for also being unbiased and pointing this out. The Samsung S5 has double the RAM compared to the iPhone 6 (1GB versus 2GB), so it's not surprising that your spare phone is still faster than your old iPhone 6. I got my battery replaced, but unfortunately, the speed increase was marginal and temporary, so don't get your hopes up too much!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mi7chy
I'm surprised that a spokesperson from MacRumors has expressed such bias; usually, MacRumors stays impartial. I completely disagree with this opinion — the iPhone 6 has a design flaw that I will describe below, that the competing Samsung S5 did not have.

I had my battery replaced in my iPhone 6 a few months ago, and it's still very slow in precisely the unexaggerated way that the Samsung ad depicts. The cause? Not enough RAM (only 1GB???) operating a modern operating system. I have a 64GB iPhone 6 with 19GB of free space, so there's really no reason other than RAM for the slowness of my phone.

Samsung S5 has 2GB RAM [early 2014]
iPhone 6 has 1GB RAM [late 2014]

Samsung S6 has 3GB RAM [early 2015]
iPhone 6S has 2GB RAM [late 2015]

Samsung S7 has 4GB RAM [early 2016]
iPhone 7 has 2GB RAM [late 2016]

Samsung S8 has 4GB RAM [early 2017]
iPhone 8 has 2GB RAM [late 2017]
iPhone X has 3GB RAM [late 2017]

Please take note! The current iPhone 8 of late 2017 has *the same* amount of RAM as the Samsung S5 from early 2014. No wonder Samsung phones are faster.

Samsung phones have always been prepared for future operating systems, thus avoiding slowdowns since at least 2014. Apple's phones have consistently been released after Samsung, and are consistently under-specced in terms of RAM. Apple is being cheap, probably under the false guise of "more RAM uses more battery".

tl;dr: Samsung's ad showcases a very-real problem with Apple's slow phones that Samsung phones don't have in comparison.

I love iPhone, but Apple really needs to lift their game for a company that neglects their macOS to obsess about iOS. If Apple's upcoming 2018 iPhones this year still have 2GB of RAM, well, I guess I'll wait another year before I upgrade.
Yeah...it's not simplistic as that, and not what was said in the quoted section of the article, nor what the ad was actually portraying.
 
I'm surprised that a spokesperson from MacRumors has expressed such bias; usually, MacRumors stays impartial. I completely disagree with this opinion — the iPhone 6 has a design flaw that I will describe below, that the competing Samsung S5 did not have.

I had my battery replaced in my iPhone 6 a few months ago, and it's still very slow in precisely the unexaggerated way that the Samsung ad depicts. The cause? Not enough RAM (only 1GB???) operating a modern operating system. I have a 64GB iPhone 6 with 19GB of free space, so there's really no reason other than RAM for the slowness of my phone.

Samsung S5 has 2GB RAM [early 2014]
iPhone 6 has 1GB RAM [late 2014]

Samsung S6 has 3GB RAM [early 2015]
iPhone 6S has 2GB RAM [late 2015]

Samsung S7 has 4GB RAM [early 2016]
iPhone 7 has 2GB RAM [late 2016]

Samsung S8 has 4GB RAM [early 2017]
iPhone 8 has 2GB RAM [late 2017]
iPhone X has 3GB RAM [late 2017]

Please take note! The current iPhone 8 of late 2017 has *the same* amount of RAM as the Samsung S5 from early 2014. No wonder Samsung phones are faster.

Samsung phones have always been prepared for future operating systems, thus avoiding slowdowns since at least 2014. Apple's phones have consistently been released after Samsung, and are consistently under-specced in terms of RAM. Apple is being cheap, probably under the false guise of "more RAM uses more battery".

tl;dr: Samsung's ad showcases a very-real problem with Apple's slow phones that Samsung phones don't have in comparison.

I love iPhone, but Apple really needs to lift their game for a company that neglects their macOS to obsess about iOS. If Apple's upcoming 2018 iPhones this year still have 2GB of RAM, well, I guess I'll wait another year before I upgrade.
[doublepost=1526712576][/doublepost]

Thank you for also being unbiased and pointing this out. The Samsung S5 has double the RAM compared to the iPhone 6 (1GB versus 2GB), so it's not surprising that your spare phone is still faster than your old iPhone 6. I got my battery replaced, but unfortunately, the speed increase was marginal and temporary, so don't get your hopes up too much!

iOS has generally needed less resources than android to run. I guess then you didn’t see all the speedtests on YouTube showing how the iPhones beat the Samsung phones in terms of geek bench scores and running apps?

I will take an iPhone with 2 gb of ram over a Samsung phone with 4 gb of ram any day.
 
On the other hand there are frequent posters that talk about iOS update shortcomings fairly consistently who see iOS 9 as one of the more horrific versions based on their experience to the point that iOS 10 was a significant improvement (despite their own claims that every update slows things down and makes things worse).
I reckon that but decided NOT to upgrade anyway - because of a fast UX & battery life
 
That's terrible. <snark> Was the iPhone 6 faster than glacial after upgrading? ;) </snark>
I own a 6+ purchased 4 months after release, and opening the wallet took 3 seconds, maps took 5 seconds. Original battery, before and after powering the phone off then back on.
I hope you’re just joking around. Or maybe I got a bad unit. But in my house with 3 other people with 6’s we all were pissed before the X came out because our phones were basically useless. Not really just that they were really slow. I’ve had the 6 since release day and if I didn’t get a X I would have killed myself as I use technology frequently. My grandmother who doesn’t use her phone as much as me has a 6 that is working fine, but for my household none of my family members were happy. It was somehow exponentially slower Han a year before. Also my Dad replaced his battery and gained a little performance but still can’t open maps in under 20-30 seconds. It’s kind of ridiculous when messages takes 7-10 seconds to open. And by open I don’t mean just open. I mean load the important parts of the app. Because maps opened really fast but didn’t load the map until 20-30 seconds after tapping it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JKAussieSkater
I'm surprised that a spokesperson from MacRumors has expressed such bias; usually, MacRumors stays impartial. I completely disagree with this opinion — the iPhone 6 has a design flaw that I will describe below, that the competing Samsung S5 did not have.

I had my battery replaced in my iPhone 6 a few months ago, and it's still very slow in precisely the unexaggerated way that the Samsung ad depicts. The cause? Not enough RAM (only 1GB???) operating a modern operating system. I have a 64GB iPhone 6 with 19GB of free space, so there's really no reason other than RAM for the slowness of my phone.

Samsung S5 has 2GB RAM [early 2014]
iPhone 6 has 1GB RAM [late 2014]

Samsung S6 has 3GB RAM [early 2015]
iPhone 6S has 2GB RAM [late 2015]

Samsung S7 has 4GB RAM [early 2016]
iPhone 7 has 2GB RAM [late 2016]

Samsung S8 has 4GB RAM [early 2017]
iPhone 8 has 2GB RAM [late 2017]
iPhone X has 3GB RAM [late 2017]

Please take note! The current iPhone 8 of late 2017 has *the same* amount of RAM as the Samsung S5 from early 2014. No wonder Samsung phones are faster.

Samsung phones have always been prepared for future operating systems, thus avoiding slowdowns since at least 2014. Apple's phones have consistently been released after Samsung, and are consistently under-specced in terms of RAM. Apple is being cheap, probably under the false guise of "more RAM uses more battery".

tl;dr: Samsung's ad showcases a very-real problem with Apple's slow phones that Samsung phones don't have in comparison.

I love iPhone, but Apple really needs to lift their game for a company that neglects their macOS to obsess about iOS. If Apple's upcoming 2018 iPhones this year still have 2GB of RAM, well, I guess I'll wait another year before I upgrade.
[doublepost=1526712576][/doublepost]

Thank you for also being unbiased and pointing this out. The Samsung S5 has double the RAM compared to the iPhone 6 (1GB versus 2GB), so it's not surprising that your spare phone is still faster than your old iPhone 6. I got my battery replaced, but unfortunately, the speed increase was marginal and temporary, so don't get your hopes up too much!

RAM is just one part of the equation. And no phone is faster than another at everything, telling yourself otherwise is fooling yourself.
 
I own an iPhone X and can confirm that iPhone 6 slow as glacier before upgrading. While I want to hate Samsung for comparing old phone to new phone I can’t as the comparison they made was pretty fair. Opening the wallet app took nearly a minute on my 6 same as maps. Really frustrating experience. But I would never switch to Samsung over that since phones ageing is part of life

I know somebody who has an iPhone 6, not updated to the latest version, and it does not run that slowly. I think you may have had some other issues or didn't update to the latest versions of iOS because they fix some lagginess.
 
Whoever approved that ad at Samsung should be fired. Lol. It doesn’t make them look good at all, it actually does the complete opposite!

Whoever ruined ios and decided to put only 1 GB ram on iohone 6 should be fired
[doublepost=1526733118][/doublepost]
RAM is just one part of the equation. And no phone is faster than another at everything, telling yourself otherwise is fooling yourself.
Ram is key anyways, only 1 GB of RAM was defenitely too low for iphone 6, same they did, apple is too cheap when it gets to RAM so longevity sucks
[doublepost=1526733170][/doublepost]
What is this...dog slow? Have you ever tried to catch a dog, they are pretty fast no?
With 1 GB of RAM it was a dog with 1 leg only
[doublepost=1526733445][/doublepost]
While I agree on the fact iOS 7 was slow on the iPhone 4 I don't think you can talk about "10 seconds" for apps like messages and mail to start. I'd say it was noticeably slower but not so much and that's true for the iPhone 6 with battery problems as well. I'm not saying it is impossible, but 10 seconds seems like there was something wrong with that particular phone, it isn't the norm. I replaced my mom's iPhone 4 a few months ago, it run iOS 7 and it felt obviously very slow to me since I compared it to my 8+, but not to the point I'd throw it out the window.

You pbviously dont hbe a 6, still jave it here (I never sell put my phones, I keep tiek), tey starting facebook or linkedin on a 6, negore is done my nesptesso machine can get me a cappuccino, some for many apps which only takes 3 secibds on a dirty chip 2 uears old Ciaomi Phone with a midrange (back to then) qualcoom Snapdragon (bit it came with 3 GB of ram ... that is the point)

Soon same will jaooen to X where they added AGAIN barely not much ram by todays standards
 
Whoever approved that ad at Samsung should be fired. Lol. It doesn’t make them look good at all, it actually does the complete opposite!
Yeah, I find it comical that a Samsung advertisement actually spends more time showing iPhones and Apple stores. Even more ironic when you consider the lack of retail support Samsung has in the US.
 
I know somebody who has an iPhone 6, not updated to the latest version, and it does not run that slowly. I think you may have had some other issues or didn't update to the latest versions of iOS because they fix some lagginess.

My iPhone 6 runs slower than this one in the ad. At least the wallet app eventually showed the boarding pass. Mine just sits there doing nothing, then eventually the offending app will just shut down. It's such a painful experience using it now (today was a prime example) - in the end I gave up, and just put it back in my pocket.
 
My iPhone 6 runs slower than this one in the ad. At least the wallet app eventually showed the boarding pass. Mine just sits there doing nothing, then eventually the offending app will just shut down. It's such a painful experience using it now (today was a prime example) - in the end I gave up, and just put it back in my pocket.
Sounds like there's something going on with your device.
 
Whoever ruined ios and decided to put only 1 GB ram on iohone 6 should be fired
[doublepost=1526733118][/doublepost]
Ram is key anyways, only 1 GB of RAM was defenitely too low for iphone 6, same they did, apple is too cheap when it gets to RAM so longevity sucks
[doublepost=1526733170][/doublepost]
With 1 GB of RAM it was a dog with 1 leg only
[doublepost=1526733445][/doublepost]

You pbviously dont hbe a 6, still jave it here (I never sell put my phones, I keep tiek), tey starting facebook or linkedin on a 6, negore is done my nesptesso machine can get me a cappuccino, some for many apps which only takes 3 secibds on a dirty chip 2 uears old Ciaomi Phone with a midrange (back to then) qualcoom Snapdragon (bit it came with 3 GB of ram ... that is the point)

Soon same will jaooen to X where they added AGAIN barely not much ram by todays standards

Yeah, one is too low. But to look at an iPhone with 2gb of RAM and act like that makes it just the same as a Samsung phone from 2015? I used the S6, I know Samsung has trouble keeping as much in 3gb as Apple does with 2. And by trouble, I mean it wasn’t able to do it.
[doublepost=1526756520][/doublepost]

Revenue?
Assets?

I mean, Apple makes more net income, but Samsung group ears 80b more every year in revenue.
 
IMO there is nothing in that ad mocking an Apple customer. It's highlighting customer frustrations with the phone and OS. Even the notch haircut is a jab at the phone.

Also, saying "Samsung ads always mock Apple customers" is completely false.
The notch haircut is the same guy from their previous commercial - the Apple customer that was standing in line at an Apple store and gave the person a somewhat threatening/forlorn look.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.