Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I just don't understand the point? Sure, I can fold the phone up and put it in a smaller space... but still... What's the need?
 
I recall that was the number Samsung gave for the original Galaxy Fold, but that number had been achieved in a Clean Room.

Hopefully this time they tested in an environment not hermetically sealed.
Also. lets say you wake your phone 2-3 per hour for 15 hours a day.
Probably no worse than iPhone power button activations.
Oh, you mean the tap screen/face id unlock that has virtually zero physical action really?
 
I just don't understand the point? Sure, I can fold the phone up and put it in a smaller space... but still... What's the need?

Same can be said about the need of smartphones when regular cellphones and laptops work just fine; or why do we need cameras in our smartphones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MartyvH
I miss fold phones, but not for this price. I hope it is a success and evolves. The phone design market has been pretty boring with just various slabs.
 
It's the price of a Galaxy S20 Ultra or iPhone 11 Pro Max for about the same size screen. I would very much prefer a foldable like this over an 11 Pro Max, if I ever wanted a phone this big, which I do not. I think this will get some sales.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kironin
We‘ll see how these do on the 2nd hand market.
What problem does it solve?

I wonder if Apple could do a camera-less feature-phone with Siri and a very small screen, on-Screen keyboard big enough just for typing numbers and FaceTime audio. Ok, they sort of have with the Watch - but in a phone formfactor, it could have a much larger battery and last much longer.
 
Time will tell with durability of course, but I think Samsung did good with this one. You’re looking at a preview of the iPhone 15 which will cost $1,999 for the lowest capacity (128GB).
 
I don't really understand what problem this design is solving.
P1-BJ957_BIGFON_DV_20130115180256.jpg
65478904-closeup-on-cell-phone-in-back-pocket-of-female-jeans.jpg


Do-not-carry-the-mobile-phone-in-your-back-pocket-1024x593.jpg


I think that answers your question.
 
Not sure if a phone that is twice as thick would fit better in a slim pocket.
Old cell phones were much thicker and still fitted nicely in normal pockets. The legendary Nokia 3310 for instance was more than 2 cm thick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kironin
200,000 folds is plenty. If I had one I’d probably just keep it open while I was home or at work and only fold it to pocket it for travel. I can’t imagine why I’d fold/unfold it all day if I was in one place for hours at a time.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PrincePoppycock
wow... why are Apples fans hating on this so much. If Apple had done this everyone would be so in love. Give Samsung credit where credit is due. This is an innovative design that looks very solid and high end. They've created a new form factor that seems to work well, Apple hasn't done this in years.

Congrats to Samsung for 'thinking different'.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.