Yep you’re right, the bendable ipad with lte is a good example and it also comes in cheaper than the Samsung fold.Apple would get a beating of biblical proportions for this. Samsung, on the other hand, is innovating so its ok.
Yep you’re right, the bendable ipad with lte is a good example and it also comes in cheaper than the Samsung fold.Apple would get a beating of biblical proportions for this. Samsung, on the other hand, is innovating so its ok.
First off, this thing already looks as thick as two phones combined. I will be curious to see how it fits into one's pockets.
I am not sure what exactly is going to change in 4-5 years that make folding phones more practical. Thinner form factor? Absence of a crease? Better durability?
And personally, I have no issues using my 8+ one-handed, and I suspect I should be able to handle the XS Max as well, given they have more or less the same form factor.
Lastly, let's just say that Apple were the one releasing this folding phone and now making the announcement that it was prone to creasing in the middle. Do you think the critics are going to be as forgiving, or would the internet be alit with all manner of articles claiming that Apple was doomed for allowing such an obviously flawed product to ever see the light of day?
Think about what you just wrote,no one with healthy mind will say the cuttng edge ultra sonic under display finger print sensor is same as the ancient mechanics of touch ID hidden under a giant bezel on iPhones.
they do the same thing yes but it’s fundamentally different technology eliminating the biggest issue (bezel).
The Face ID is not ergonomic at all, and there is no way around it,as a Face ID user from origonal iPhone X launch until it’s latest form in Xs Max,I am sure everyone knows how annoying it is at times having to lift the phone and holding in in a way it can scan your face..for example when the phone is on a table etc etc etc no such problem with Under display finger print sensor.
Apple came up with Face ID be ause they couldnt make under display touch ID at that time and so they ditched the whole idea.if they had access the technology Samsung has now,we wouldn’t be talking about Face ID at all,
and it’s easy win for Samsungs small laser cut camera hole vs the huge notch.we don’t even need to debate.
It's not optimistic to expect improvements to the FaceID metrics that can be and need to to be improved.
Touch ID 2 was introduced on it's 3rd iteration, so it's not beyond the pale to expect FaceID 2 on it's 3rd iteraction.
What is really impressive about it? We've seen displays fold before. The question is, does it solve a problem or create more?A folding display is certainly impressive but I don't think it's going to be popular enough to replace current smartphone formats.
Do you have difficulty completing reading a sentence?Well there you go. They do the same thing.
there are no point in replying to you buddy, you are a blind fanboy and do not want to accept the reality,Samsung did a great job with S10 series, the design, hardware and features are innovative and superior too Apple's greedy, lazy work with the Xs / Xr series.This is what the wider throw I discussed earlier would solve.
Absolute rubbish.
Not really. The OS and apps aren't designed to accommodate it so it will get in the way.
You don't buy many Apple products then?Best option IMO would be to let the tech mature and wait for the price go down to sub 1k levels. No way I'm going to pay upwards of 2k for something that can break if I drop it, or get stolen if I forget it, or misplace.
i9 2018 MacBook Pro?I’m not.
You’re looking at the Goliath that is Apple and that the strategy has worked and they continue to satisfy customers in an industry with tons of choices.
Crap erodes your brand. Samsung throws out crap and sees if it sticks, eroding their image of quality. Apple isn’t going to put their logo on something that is CLEARLY not ready.
That's the thing, Apple usually isn't first into any market, however when they enter a market, they bring a level of refinement which devastates competition. Tough to argue that the strategy has been unsuccessful.
This “add” is to me one of the most beautiful videos Apple has ever created. The message, animation, music - everything is perfect, telling you exactly what makes Apple special. It is such an amazing piece!
Apple can’t/won’t focus on being first; and they don’t have to. They would never release something like this, that is so untested and unfinished.
Samsung is experimenting with multiple folding designs to figure out what kind of fold works best with a smartphone/tablet hybrid.Samsung's vertically folding smartphone is set to be released in late 2019 or early 2020, with the company currently working on mockups to finalize the device's design. Right now, the smartphone has an extra screen on the outside, but it may be removed.
What is really impressive about it? We've seen displays fold before. The question is, does it solve a problem or create more?
Apple would get a beating of biblical proportions for this. Samsung, on the other hand, is innovating so its ok.
The current foldable displays are a step backward and Samsung has already admitted their first offering sucks. This has nothing to do with anyone being able to make it themselves.lol, go ahead and make one in your spare time and show us just how unimpressive it is.
What's wrong with the i9 MacBook Pro?You don't buy many Apple products then?
[doublepost=1551885460][/doublepost]
i9 2018 MacBook Pro?
[doublepost=1551885819][/doublepost]
That's the thing, Apple usually isn't first into any market, however when they enter a market, they bring a level of refinement which devastates competition. Tough to argue that the strategy has been unsuccessful.
It's something completely new, there are bound to be issues and I welcome some redress even if it is in this form. Apple should have engaged in exhaustive usability testing with the folding iPhone 6, (some thing they already had loads of experience with)."Samsung is experimenting with multiple folding designs to figure out what kind of fold works best with a smartphone/tablet hybrid."
This to me, screams that Samsung didn't engage in exhaustive usability testing and rushed to get first to market.
It's not optimistic to expect improvements to the FaceID metrics that can be and need to to be improved.
Touch ID 2 was introduced on it's 3rd iteration, so it's not beyond the pale to expect FaceID 2 on it's 3rd iteraction.
The Face ID is not ergonomic at all, and there is no way around it,as a Face ID user from origonal iPhone X launch until it’s latest form in Xs Max,I am sure everyone knows how annoying it is at times having to lift the phone and holding in in a way it can scan your face..for example when the phone is on a table etc etc etc no such problem with Under display finger print sensor.
If you watched the keynote, the presenter unfolded the Galaxy Fold the instant he took it out of his pocket.
I suspect that the device is going to make for a very poor smartphone experience. It has a ridiculously small display for its form factor, and is extremely thick to boot. The only real value is to use it as a tablet, which means you will find yourself wanting or having to unfold it every time you took it out of your pocket, then folding it before keeping it back in your pocket.
That does not strike me as a great experience. Consumers are not really going to want to keep unfolding the device when using it. Even the largest iPhone is still useable in one hand. It’s unclear why someone would want to carry a small tablet that folds into a suboptimal smartphone instead of just carrying a much better smartphone. It's just not practical.
Is this really worth the combined price of an iPhone XS Max, iPad Pro and AirPods?
Came here (late) to say this. People talk about Apple using customers as beta testers—they don't have anything on this. Already talking about defects on $2000 devices before they even ship? Wow. This is why Apple waits until things are ready. Not always perfect, but ready."Samsung is experimenting with multiple folding designs to figure out what kind of fold works best with a smartphone/tablet hybrid."
This to me, screams that Samsung didn't engage in exhaustive usability testing and rushed to get first to market.
Is that your mantra? "Innovations change lives". That's not what innovation is. It can change lives but that's not a quality of innovation.
On topic: Bending a plastic screen will leave a crease. Who didn't realize that? Samsung should just position the Fold as a proof of concept device, because that's what it is. So are the other fold designs they're going to offer. I see folding phones in the same light as 3D and curved TV's. Flashes in the pan.
The current foldable displays are a step backward and Samsung has already admitted their first offering sucks. This has nothing to do with anyone being able to make it themselves.
[doublepost=1551892177][/doublepost]
What's wrong with the i9 MacBook Pro?
There is a difference between being excited about the future and having the first offering objectively be a beta product that has tons of flaws. It's CLEARLY too thick, too heavy, plastic screen already has creasing, clunky design, no one-handed use, etc etc.I hardly think Samsung have said their first offering sucks. Point me to a source if they have.
And if they are such a step backwards then why am I reading all over the Internet how excited the industry as a whole is about them?