Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Samsung's shameless copying has gone from funny, to shake your head, to shrug, to ignore it, and back to funny.

Samsung and their customers: Beyond Embarrassment, Beyond Shame

Ok Samsung sure, but their customers, beyond shame?

I really don't think that the average worldwide consumer electronics customer gives a rats ass about the fact that Samsung is prone to copy from Apple. People see just a cheap smart phone.

Now fans are an obvious, albeit small, exception.
 
This just seals the deal on me never buying a Samsung product even if it is the best one day. I will never support a thieving company.

----------



well of course, would you like someone ripping your ideas off and making money from them? :rolleyes:

I guess you do not comprehend sarcasm.
 
haven't you heard? Samsung's new OS will have a simpler, flatter and unified colour scheme design with the S5 - including icons that are all same sized and rounded at the corners. I think that qualifies it as being called iOSdroid to be fair. Either that or WinDroid since the icons actually look like they're copied from Windows 8 stock images.

Image

So basically windows 8 design except instead of squares and rectangles the icons are circular.
 
Was there an application of a fingerprint sensor in the home button before?
I understand the debate on software patents but isn`t this a clear copying?
Apple can patent the technology, or the method, or even a idea, but it can't be such a broad idea as "fingerprint scanner on the home button".
Apple has a scanner that is motionless. Just place your finger on the pad. Samsung's reportedly requires a swipe. There may be ways for Samsung to duplicate the motionless scanning using a different technology or method, but I guess they can't do it, or they can't do it in a way that is cost effective. So they're using older methods (though maybe improved technology).
If I were a Samsung fan, I'd be looking forward to this. It will probably have some bells and whistles that Apple doesn't yet. Since I'm an Apple fan, I'm looking forward to getting it in the iPhone 6 (when I'm eligible for an upgrade), and in the next iPad, and hopefully in the next MacBook Pro, too. And I hope Apple adds more bells and whistles in the next OS update.
 
Reminds me of a quote i have seen before. Let me edit it:

"Samsung Town, Start Your Photocopiers"
 
Well, I have to say even though I'm against overdoing patents and trademarks, Samsung does indeed appear to be quite the Doppelganger for Apple ideas. OTOH, Apple buys its parts FROM Samsung, so WTF do they expect from a company that they purposely do business with who is making the parts for them in many cases? It's TOO EASY for Samsung to just take the same or similar parts they're making and badge their own phone with a different OS. Apple shouldn't deal with a company that is ripping them off, IMO. It doesn't look good, if nothing else.

Regardless, it is actually Google (Samsung makes a good distraction) that is Apple's true enemy since Google is the one powering the operating system that is Microsoft's Windows to Mac's OS. On the plus side, Apple is no longer pushing its classic OS equivalent, but then Google's Android isn't exactly MS-Dos or Windows 95 either. It's just hard to imagine Apple maintaining its market share indefinitely without constantly having to re-invent itself as sooner or later the economies of size are going to catch up and nay pass Apple's market share. Oh wait. That has already happened. And Google is now #2 behind Apple for the most valuable company on Earth. How long before they switch positions and Apple drops down down down? A decade? A few years? Next year? It's hard to say, but I fear it's inevitable. Larger shares with lower prices ultimately trump higher prices with cachet. It's why KIA has gone from a Yugo-like joke to one of the top car companies in the world because most of the world is POOR and cheaper sells, particular as quality eventually catches up. The only way for Apple to stay ahead is to constantly have new features the other companies don't have yet that people really want enough to pay more.
 
Claiming that a fingerprint scanner is "copying" is no more "thievery" than including a camera or a volume button. Hardware of in itself is nothing. It's the implementation of a subset of designs that serve a purpose (software) that is the crux of this issue. And since TouchID does little more than unlock a device, any designer could have a field day with its possibilities. I've read that it's possible that this would allow purchases from the Play Store. Wouldn't you love that for the App Store? If and when that occurs and Samsung is the first to have the fingerprint scanner to allow this, at what point do we sound the "yeah well, Apple implements it better and that's all that matters" horn?

This thread is nothing but hypocrisy. Hardly shocking.
 
OTOH, Apple buys its parts FROM Samsung, so WTF do they expect from a company that they purposely do business with who is making the parts for them in many cases? It's TOO EASY for Samsung to just take the same or similar parts they're making and badge their own phone with a different OS. Apple shouldn't deal with a company that is ripping them off, IMO. It doesn't look good, if nothing else.

So Apple shouldn't seek out parts that have the highest quality to use in their devices?

Further - what parts are Samsung "taking" to just put them together in their own phones.

Are you suggesting Samsung shouldn't use their own screens? Or memory? Or? Or that by doing so it ripping off Apple?
 
Dear Sammy,

While we're suing you for copying do you mind making us some chips to go in our devices?

kthxbai

Tim
 
What's all the fuss about? Samsung is just continuing the extremely successful trend that Motorola has set by implementing a finger print reader in the amazingly successful Atrix 4G.
 
Claiming that a fingerprint scanner is "copying" is no more "thievery" than including a camera or a volume button.

Who called it "thievery"? Sounds like a strawman to me.

I've read that it's possible that this would allow purchases from the Play Store. Wouldn't you love that for the App Store? If and when that occurs and Samsung is the first to have the fingerprint scanner to allow this, at what point do we sound the "yeah well, Apple implements it better and that's all that matters" horn?

TouchID already allows you to do this.
 
Actually you end up with far less choices as a consumer if everybody copies Apple. It isn't much of a choice if the phones are physically the same devices.

So? Let people say they copied Apple. I didn't say they never have. But if their copying is resulting in more choices for us consumers, then so be it.
Obviously you have never been involved in a business that has had its ideas stolen by others. Theft that forces you to lay off hundreds of people. The whole point of the patent system is to allow exclusivity to new technology for the developer or licensees. Without that exclusivity the economy drifts to generic low wage activities that do nothing for the businesses nor their employees.
Apple wants only the iPhone to be the only smartphone in the market.
That is completely ignorant. Apple wants the iPhone to be the only iPhone on the market. All these other companies need to do is to develop their own smartphone technologies and they would be in the clear. Instead they blatantly rip off Apple.
The Galaxy phones are nice, they just needs work on their UI.

No they need to work on making them a Galaxy smart phone that isn't a copy of the iPhone. It is pretty simple really.
 
5S? S5? 5S? S5? Old people are going to be very confused...

I wouldn't be surprised if that was part of the strategy.

"Hey, our phone has 'everything' that other phone has except ours is bigger and has better specs and has more checks on the feature comparison list. And, the model names are almost identical."
 
5S? S5? 5S? S5? Old people are going to be very confused...

Yup...us old people sure are dumb...yup...yup...:p

Lucky for us there are some really smarty young people to tell us that, and help us to cross the street...yup...yup...




***leaves to wipe up drool and change diaper***


:rolleyes: ;)

BTW: Does Samsung "copying" a device feature diminish your device?:confused:
 
Last edited:
This is not necessarily a bad thing. Apple set the precedent of what should be in a phone then the hordes copy it. The only catch is Apple can perfect the hardware and software required to make it work.

For samsung they need to get the hardware right and hope google can get the software side right with android. having to work with a partner is much harder to integrate things then if you do both parts yourself.
 
I have a fingerprint scanner like this on my Lenovo laptop, its beyond awful.

Before I gave up on using it completely I used to average 3 or more swipes to unlock my laptop, swiping just doesn't seem to work very well because speed of swipe seems to be critical and getting it just right not easy, it's actually quicker to type in my password.
 
Who called it "thievery"? Sounds like a strawman to me.



TouchID already allows you to do this.

There were a few posts earlier which refered to Samsung as "thieves". And to your second point, I was referring to having it work that was without multiple touches to re-authenticate.
 
It's about the execution, but too little people get that.

It doesn't matter, coz:

1. Samsung users don't really care about quality of execution (otherwise I wonder how they'd tolerate the blue-ish screen)

2. Samsung users haven't tried iPhone 5s so they probably won't know how good things can get.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.