How are there people who thumbs down’d this? Competition is always a great thing for the consumer. And Samsung builds a great phone. Hardware is amazing. Software, that’s more subjective.
Personally, I feel that the whole "competition is good" saying is a meaningless motherhood statement that doesn't really represent the realities on the ground. People have parroted this adage so many times as some sort of default template in response to any company releasing a new product that it has basically lost all significance, because they don't stop to analyse and make the distinction between "competition" and "meaningful competition".
I didn't downvote that comment (in fact, I don't think I have ever downvoted anything here), but I didn't really pay it any attention either. It's just...there for the sake of being there.
For me, it all begins with Apple's own unique definition of innovation, which isn't simply to be first or different. With a company like Samsung, I often get the impression that they release certain product categories like phablets or folding phones not so much because of the user experience, but simply so they can claim the credit for being the first to come up with a new ideas, however half-baked. It feels like this strategy is driven more by Samsung's component business, where they try to lure competitors into following them to adopt new categories (and in turn boost demand for components like folding displays), rather than because anyone at Samsung genuinely cares about the end user experience.
Samsung just feels rudderless (for lack of a better term) from a product vision perspective in my book. Frankly, I am not seeing any clear direction from them.
It's the opposite with Apple, where design is the magic ingredient. Designers call the shots, and search for and have technology made to serve the product experience, and not engineers excited about some hot new tech and trying to turn it into a product. This is why I am not particularly bothered about Apple products seemingly losing the "spec war". Apple devices have never been about having the most ram or the most megapixels, but about hardware and software integrating together to enable a unique experience.
Hearing aid on AirPods is an example of a feature that can legitimately enhance lives. I continue to use airplay mirroring with my iPad every day, and the experience has been rock solid. You see something like double tap on the apple watch being expanded to the Vision Pro. And let's be honest - are any of these actually posing legitimate competition to Apple? From what I can see, Apple continues to hold its own in the smartphone market, and its active user base continues to grow. Many industries were expected to put Apple in its place, but where exactly are the viable alternatives to the iPad, Apple Watch, AirPods, or even apple silicon?
Sure, there's competition (again, for lack of a better term), but how much of this is actually "meaningful competition"?