I’m looking at the Samsung page right now and it states the S9 is 5120 x 1440. I wish it was 2880The S9 is a document and app monitor with twice the vertical resolution for better rendering of text and graphics 5120 x 2880px.
I’m looking at the Samsung page right now and it states the S9 is 5120 x 1440. I wish it was 2880The S9 is a document and app monitor with twice the vertical resolution for better rendering of text and graphics 5120 x 2880px.
I’m looking at the Samsung page right now and it states the S9 is 5120 x 1440. I wish it was 2880![]()
This may be the case for some people, but definitely not all.Way better value than whatever Apple has to offer. Easy recommendation over Apple's monitor.
¥11499 is $82.35 something is not right with this price. Maybe a “0” is missing and then the the price would be $825.50If that's really the price, that's about $1600. Lol. Why bother Samsung?
I have the 27 inch U2723QE Dell, identical feature wise to the 32 inch. It has the best and most extensive dock of those options, KVM, and delivers 100W power to the laptop thru its USB-C/display port. Only 4K though, but blacks are very good, factory colour calibrated.I've been researching displays to replace my old Apple Thunderbolt displays that I have at work. Due to cost, my work will likely deny any attempt to get an Apple Studio Display, so options are a bit limited. Regardless, here are some options that seem workable, all at 32-inches 4k:
I don't know what would be best, and some of them probably even use the same display. I lean towards the Dell or HP. While I wish any of these were retina, it just isn't where the industry has gone (except for Apple). I imagine most manufacturers won't go to 5k/6k screens, and the next jump will be when 8k becomes the next big thing—which we are still years away from.
- Dell UltraSharp U3223QE
- HP Z32k G3 4K USB-C Display
- LG 32UQ85R
- Samsung 32" M80C (the model reference in this article)
I will say that I am tempted to get a 42 inch C2 LG OLED for home to use as my main display. Obviously the PPI is low (104.9) but it is pretty close to a 27" 1440p panel (109). The fact that I'll be viewing it farther back on a desk would help, and the OLED contrast and blacks would be amazing. I do have some concerns, but there are a number of people that currently do this and so I'm tempted to try as well.
If Apple could release a more-budget Studio display at $999 this conversation wouldn't even need to happen. Or in my dreams sell a 32-inch 6k display around $2000...
$82.35 would be the price if yen, $1600 if yuan. The symbol for both is the same. The image says samsing.com/cn so it is yuan.¥11499 is $82.35 something is not right with this price. Maybe a “0” is missing and then the the price would be $825.50
Not skewed at all. Just wraps around your field of view a bit better than a very wide regular monitor that’s viewed up close.Genuine question to the group: I'm not a gamer but for editing work, photo work, etc, is there an advantage to a curved monitor or does it represent everything as bit - what's the right word - skewed?
Thanks.$82.35 would be the price if yen, $1600 if yuan. The symbol for both is the same. The image says samsing.com/cn so it is yuan.
I agree. I hope it is a lot cheaper as I want a 5K monitor at a reasonable price.Thanks.
How can they even hope to sell the device at that price point. It’s almost as expensive as the Studio Display. Nobody will buy it when they can buy the Studio Display at a similar price.
I actually have a curved monitor that I don't use for gaming. I exclusively use it for my office job. I don't do a lot of photo work, so I can't really speak to your needs. But for me, it helps me be much more productive with less neck strain. To get there though, it took me weeks of experimenting with the location and angle of the monitor. Regarding the "skewness", I personally didn't find the image to be skewed. Not sure how that would apply to photo editingGenuine question to the group: I'm not a gamer but for editing work, photo work, etc, is there an advantage to a curved monitor or does it represent everything as bit - what's the right word - skewed?
🤔 because windows/linux scale at any any resolution and still look sharp. macOS awful render works well at native or double, everything in between is a blurry mess and performance issues 🤔.... apple made the 5K display in order to make a "retina" 1440p monitor...🤔.... (2560×1440 x2 = 5120(5K)×2880) 🤔....If they can't get the DPI up to Studio Display levels, no thanks.
5K Hi-DPI displays are now decade-old tech. Why are brand new monitors still lacking it?
I use this for that reason:I just want one display that has the inputs to support my work PC and my home Mac. Apple needs to include multiple inputs if they want to sell more displays.
They're OK. Keep in mind that the curvature number, like 1500R, indicates the radius of the curve in millimeters. So in this case your eyes are ideally 1.5m or about 5' from the screen.Genuine question to the group: I'm not a gamer but for editing work, photo work, etc, is there an advantage to a curved monitor or does it represent everything as bit - what's the right word - skewed?
Actually I've found out that (theoretically) apple studio display has the scaling issue while being used with latests macbooks pro as those two have different PPIs and at theirs natives resolutions those two show UI elements in visibly different sizes. So one has to use non-native resolution on one of those 2 displays in order to make UI looking consistent, and this can potentially lead to scaling issues like on 4k displays (couldn't find anything about it in the web unfortunately).That's a whole 'nuther issue with macOS -- needing either 5K to look good or oddball resolutions that no monitor manufacturer makes.
I had to dig into the page a little but they do say it is full 5K and 2880.I’m looking at the Samsung page right now and it states the S9 is 5120 x 1440. I wish it was 2880![]()
If you use a 4K display and render 2560x1440 hires on it, it is not a blurry mess. If you compare side to side with a true 5K it won't look quite as sharp on the smallest text but that is to be expected as there are fewer pixels. Performance does not take a hit in spite of Apple legal department giving you a warning "might impact performance". You would have to run some performance specing tools to be able to tell any difference. At least for Apple Silicon Macs. An older Intel Mac might struggle but they get hot no matter what.🤔 because windows/linux scale at any any resolution and still look sharp. macOS awful render works well at native or double, everything in between is a blurry mess and performance issues 🤔.... apple made the 5K display in order to make a "retina" 1440p monitor...🤔.... (2560×1440 x2 = 5120(5K)×2880) 🤔....
Because it is 27" 5k DCI P3 and factory calibrated, supposed to be cheaper alternative to Studio Display (which was designed specifically for use with Mac OS)Isn't G9 supposed to be superior to S9? why are people dying for S9 when G9 is supposed to be better?
Some signs of its live are starting to come through : a Swiss retailer had published S9 page on its website with price and also the S9 specs page had recently appeared on the Samsung Australia website.Still no S9?