Well the 3.5mm jack wasnt going to last forever, it was going to be replaced eventually. So why not replace it with a port that not only do you offer on your own products, but also every other competitor will eventually use.
Also if I am not mistaken doesn't USB-C offer more features tech wise (like faster speeds, wider variety of things you can do with it, etc) over the lighting port? Imagine if you could charge your laptop and phone with the same cable? Or if your headphones you use on your MacBook you could immediately use on your iPhone without needing an adaptor?
My issue is more that If I buy 2 products from apple (MB & Ip7), I have to use an adaptor to use my headphones....
LOL. Sure, if you are no bigger than an ant then you have solid argument there...
But compatibility is the last thing on Apple's mind when it comes to cables.
Floppy disk drive =/= headphone jack"You know what else it comes with? A headphone jack. And a floppy disk drive."
I agree with most of this, but to be fair, your ear requires an analog input. At some point that digital signal has to be turned into an analog one. As a practical matter, it does make some sense for that place to be in your phone, instead of making it necessary to have a DAC in every pair of headphones you buy.
I was all for the elimination of the floppy disk and DVD drives, but this feels different to me. I can't say I'm excited to have to buy new headphones I either need to charge or can only use with my iPhone, or to carry an adapter around. We'll see.
Yup. I'm pretty darn sure that these guys who make the DAP's like this pretty much know the real deal on how to make good sound quality and what to use in their products.And I think you don't understand that even without 3.5mm jack iPhone will still need a DAC chip (unless you prefer to "digital" sound on the phone's internal speakers). You can also notice that all hifi equipment (preamplifiers/DACs/amplifiers etc. costing many thousands of dollars) come with an analog jack for the phones.
Of course they'll get over it, hopefully nobody will still be complaining in 3 years time (although if nobody else follows their move they may be). This is a bigger deal than anything else Apple has removed because it has been used for so long.People also bitched about the removal of a CD drive on MacBooks, not supporting flash on iPhone, not including flash in OS X, et cetera, et cetera. People will get over it.
It always does at Samsung events, maybe it's the audience or maybe it's them.While I think removing the audio jack is a terrible decision, that joke absolutely bombed.
No i dont think so. Because they will add another connection that will cost them more with the lighting cable. But were they will make money is rather with theyr own propietary connection. Infact either you will buy a lighting headphone or a lighting to audio jack adaptor, both ways will make apple money. Same they did with other things. Like the dvd burner.Keep in mind that Tim Cook does not lower the price of newly introduced products that replace existing products. The fewer components that are in a product the lower the manufacturing cost.
The profit margins will increase.
There is a saying of "Follow the money." When you apply the logic of money to the removal of the audio jack, the reason becomes obvious.
You can't hear anything until it is converted to analog. So every device will still have an analog converter, just moved to the headphones. Price down on music device, price up 2x on headphones, since headphone makers are not used to DAC technology. Oh and now you need batteries on both headphones an music device. Oh and now you also need a radio on the headphones and that has traditionally been very poor performance.
Just not seeing it, except as a way to reduce music device cost.
For the love of God, PLEASE send this to Tim if you know his email.Ain't that the God's honest truth -
As usual the Samsung party is commenting (from 2nd place)...
Samsung mocks Apple for trying to remove wires. Hmmm never heard of Samsung trolling anyone about wires. Oh yea their wireless charging B.S. because it's too hard for their fanboys to plug in a single charging cable. So they don't want wires when your phone is stationary and charging but they want wires when your ambulatory. Doesn't make any sense to me.
I do still bitch about it. Its a reason why i never bought an iphone since iphone 4. Infact no bluetooth shareing with other devices, no free flash games. Samsung served me well and if i must will buy every half year a new one selling the old.People also bitched about the removal of a CD drive on MacBooks, not supporting flash on iPhone, not including flash in OS X, et cetera, et cetera. People will get over it.
Both brands are crap sound quality.He asked. "An audio jack. I'm just saying," he added with a smirk as the audience laughed.
Yeah, hahaha....it's funny until you realize the trend in headphones is Bluetooth connectivity. Bose and Beats embraced it, and you will too.
This issue about Apple removing things has always gone on as Apple moves forward when others watch then copy, take the floppy disc drive, Apple supported SONY's floppy format from day one and when time was right stopped, optical drives also gone...
USB, replaced the old serial and parallel port, did anyone complain about that yes, now no USB way way better these people just can't help complain for what is good for them.
Word on the street was that the s7 or s7 edge was supposed to have their version of 3D Touch but got pulled last minute because it wasn't quite ready. I would not be surprised if the s8/s8 edge does have it.
Mocking a phone that doesn't exist? That's how you sell your product?
There isn't really anything earth shattering going on in the smartphone world these days.
Have to talk about something I guess ?
Yeah, do like me and buy these: http://www.beoplay.com/products/beoplayh7Both brands are crap sound quality.