None of the Chinese phones are better to Samsung or iPhones, every single one of them is a copycat
The point is the survey is excluding a large number of products, and their quality or consumer satisfaction wasn't measured *at all*.
But this copying claim is not really true.
The first foldable phone? Royole Flexpai
First tri-fold phone? Huawei Mate XT
First optical (under display) fingerprint reader? Vivo XO (Apple had a different technology years earlier - capacitive touch home button)
The largest battery? Realme Power P4 (10,000mAH)
First silicon carbon battery? Honor Magic Pro 5, followed by tons of Chinese brands; Samsung still doesn't have it
Continuous zoom camera? First implemented by Sony, rapidly adopted by many Chinese brands, and I don't believe Samsung even has it yet
First mechanical zoom camera? Xiaomi 17 Ultra
The Vivo X300 Ultra is generally considered the top camera phone today. 200MP (really 50MP in that silly x4 mode but they all lie about this, even Apple)
Oppo, Oneplus, Honor, Xiaomi, Realme, Redmi all push the envelope.
You even see jarring things like a somewhat odd mix of cheap Chinese internals and high end Leica optics.
There are also areas where the Chinese phones are pushing the envelope that I think are utterly useless, if not counterproductive, like fastest charging times and fastest screen refresh rates, but again its the Chinese models pushing the envelope, not vice versa.
Indeed, it is not the Chinese brands copying the Samsung advances as much as the opposite: It is Samsung copying many of the advances of these brands. Which of course is the point of discussing their exclusion from this survey at all. If they were irrelevant products that didn't push the envelope, their exclusion would be irrelevant.
Anyway, the "copycat" claim is somewhat irrelevant. Isn't Android just a "copycat" of iOS? Isn't every new smartphone just a "copycat" of Steve Job's original ? And it's not even a matter of Samsung's technical ability. Samsung actually makes a lot of very high end components (including periscope zoom camera modules used in these Chinese phones), and presumably could have been first to market, but it doesn't even put them in its own phones (as does Sony).
The point is this study leaves out a large number of competitors, with an impressive array of products, in order to focus on the mass market firms of Samsung and Apple. Which is entirely the reason the misleading ACSI "survey" exists in the first place. It's like a car survey stating "GM edges out Ford" in a restricted subset of drivers.
The point is surveying only 40% of the market, regardless of how "copycat" they are, is not a true picture of consumer sentiment.
Counterpoint Research Insight
counterpointresearch.com