Silly other company.
You may overtake Apple in a new market, but only after Apple has solidified it first![]()
Excepted, given that it is just a $300 accessory.
50,000 is better than none.
Why does anybody need a smartwatch, if it is supposed to do the same things that a smartphone does?
Except Apple will sell at least that many, launch day of their iWhatever.
Did samsung fail or does the market not give a care about smart watches?
50,000 is better than none.
Wait, what? Has somebody completely forgotten about Sony here? I'm pretty sure they qualify as a "major electronics company", and the original LiveView smartwatch--which was an Android sidecar, not unlike this one--was previewed back at the end of 2010, three years ago. Even the LiveView2 shipped before the Samsung.While Samsung is the first major electronics company to come out with a smart watch...
Maybe it's because I'm swiss or just a matter of taste, but I don't see me wear some computer watch which I'll have to upgrade every two years or so. It just doesn't compare to a beautiful automatic watch which one can wear for years
Image
Sure... a little more than $299 if you want a bit of quality, but still cheaper than an iPhone 5C. ...and lasting much longer as well, I guess![]()
I'll never change my Omega Speedmaster for a digital watch.
guess how much this one is
![]()
50,000 is better than none.