Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The iPhone 6 is even faster than my MacBook Pro 13" from 2010. (2929p vs 2400p in Geekbench 3).

Is Geekbench a good indicator of Desktop/mobile performance? Like scores from desktop almost translate to like mobile scores? Or does 2400 multi core score on desktop and 2900 on iPhone 6 mean anything diferent
 
Technology waits for no man - Please make a chip that will extend tower range for desolate areas. I know apples and oranges but I can dream..
 
Is Geekbench a good indicator of Desktop/mobile performance? Like scores from desktop almost translate to like mobile scores? Or does 2400 multi core score on desktop and 2900 on iPhone 6 mean anything diferent

Most benchmarks on mobile seemingly don't take into account throlling (which would happen a lot less on a laptop and almost never on a desktop). That's the biggest different.

The A8 because it doesn't throttle, has a more laptop like performance on intense tasks.
 
whats wrong with 5/5s thickness? jesus, do all you people have carny hands? i'm 6'5 with big mits and these little phones are driving me nuts

Put a battery pack on it and it will be protected and you'll have 2 days intense use of battery life (oh, and it will be thicker :).
 
If you look back to 2010 - the iPhone 4 - you can see there is quite a considerable reduction in bezel between the 4 and the 6.

Image

You are right, in 2010 they were more god awful, now in 2014 they are just monstrously horrible which is a slight improvement. I think they should slim down to something 2014ish right about 2020.
 
50% more power efficient which means...AN EVEN THINNER PHONE.

...made of aluminum foil and Saran Wrap. You'll be able to bend it into any shape you want. You'll be able to wrap it around your ear and never need any BT device.

Wow this love/hate relationship between the two is firmly bonded in business. They are the stereotypical couple who stay together for the "kids". Apple has their "girlfriends" on the side, but they keep coming back to Samsung. Say what you will about Sammie, this relationship has worked out well for the both of them.
 
They could integrate touch ID into the Apple logo on the back with an index finger focus.

Exactly what I just thought. Though i hope that Apple never caves from pressure about "the bezels are too big." They are perfect.
 
Last edited:
I may be wrong, but I've heard that they use the octal number system in Germany.
You are thinking about the Simpsons.

five+finges.png
 
You are thinking about the Simpsons.

Image

He he, I was not joking. :D That's a very confusing image btw.

But one thing is for sure, we now know that Microsoft use octal versioning numbers. :D Eh, actually I'm not paying attention, never mind lol. :p
 
Last edited:
I don't get the obsession of not wanting a home button for some people on here , do you not realise that if they get rid of the home button , that they would have to implement inscreen buttons which take up screen realestate ? Thus making your 4'7 inches phones etc not really 4'7 inches because you have a useless bar at the bottom of the screen.


Get rid of most of the bezel at the top and sides , and reduce the bezel at the bottom slightest and it would fix the problem
 
whats wrong with 5/5s thickness? jesus, do all you people have carny hands? i'm 6'5 with big mits and these little phones are driving me nuts

I'm 6'5" as well with big hands and have no problem holding and using the iPhone 6 Plus even though it is pretty thin. I did throw a case on it because it's slippery, but even without the case since I have a ZAGG protector on the back, I can hold it just fine.
 
If you look back to 2010 - the iPhone 4 - you can see there is quite a considerable reduction in bezel between the 4 and the 6.

Image

That's not a considerable amount in 4 years! There are bezel less phones being made already
 
6+ 64 GB ordered and on the way, brah! I'm building my own version of Google Cardboard out of balsa wood to use with that gorgeous display. Currently have a 4S and find myself carrying around a Nexus 7 most of the time, so hopefully the 6+ is just right. I expect to miss the portability of the 4S in some situations, but until I try a phablet that's all speculation.

However, if the 6+ bends with normal use, I will get it replaced by Apple, sell it on ebay, and go Android. There is no excuse for a mobile device designed to be carried with a person at all times to have anything less than rock-hard structural rigidity. It's a tool for 24/7 use, not a museum piece.

I see this as a design flaw in virtually all mobile phones. We have bulletproof watches and we never worry about sitting on our wallets, so why expect delicacy in a phone on the cusp of replacing our wallet? 10-15 years from now people will look back with amazement at how we put up with such fragile devices. I won't be surprised if the 6+ turns out to be the device that triggers a new design trend towards indestructable mobile units. Apple learn from their mistakes, so the new trend may even originate with the iPhone 7. :p

----------



Liar, imbecile, or Apple PR Droid? Pick any two.


She won't bend brah. Just dont hold it with two hands with both thumbd near the volume rocker and push.

I agree Apple will likely fix this for the s version. That's why I'm on the s cycle. 4s, 5s, now waiting for the 6s. The second revision is the phone with the full feature set for the form factor plus the fixes to any issues.

You're going to enjoy the 6+, I can already tell
The girls will be frothing from their lips when they see you holding it.

Ps, don't buy an android, you'll then have no reason to reply to my diatribes on macrumors.
 
I don't get the obsession of not wanting a home button for some people on here , do you not realise that if they get rid of the home button , that they would have to implement inscreen buttons which take up screen realestate ? Thus making your 4'7 inches phones etc not really 4'7 inches because you have a useless bar at the bottom of the screen.


Get rid of most of the bezel at the top and sides , and reduce the bezel at the bottom slightest and it would fix the problem

Is there really a problem?

Saving 10mm at the top and bottom maybe 2mm off the sides (because Apple's not going to remove all bezel, many people like to have it). Then, they need a place to put whatever was under this stuff, so probably it makes the phone around 7.5 mm thick and look exactly like all other phones with a front button ?
 
Same thing that happened from cm to um to nm. You can call the 14 nm process the 14,000 picometer process if you want. There are still micron processes being used out there. Once we get down to the atomic scale, we will have to go to the subatomic scale, which would be quantum computers. And those are a very very long way off.

Of course. I feel really thick now.
 
She won't bend brah. Just dont hold it with two hands with both thumbd near the volume rocker and push.

I agree Apple will likely fix this for the s version. That's why I'm on the s cycle. 4s, 5s, now waiting for the 6s. The second revision is the phone with the full feature set for the form factor plus the fixes to any issues.

You're going to enjoy the 6+, I can already tell
The girls will be frothing from their lips when they see you holding it.

Ps, don't buy an android, you'll then have no reason to reply to my diatribes on macrumors.

Android w/ Dalvik runtime is problematic, but maybe Android L w/ ART will finally be the one. Funny thing, I find Android to be more Mac-like than iOS, except for stability. If they fix the stability, then the only reason I have to go iOS is to more easily sync to my Mac.

Android is about power and versatility, just like a Mac. A user adapts Android to his needs, exactly like a Mac. iOS is the complete opposite, which works for me on a phone but definitely not a tablet. I also take issue with the glacial pace of iOS improvements. Back in it's day, OS X piled on features every 18 months, yet all iOS manages for YEARS is a new theme and notifications. It's still missing a right swipe screen, what's up with that? Prime real estate left empty. No GUI design sense at all on that iOS team...
 
Last edited:
I really hope they don't go any thinner. This nonsense of making something super thin is driving me crazy. How about working on those fat bezels?

Side bezel on the iPhone are really thin.
People here complaining about fat bezels really puzzles me. The bottom bezel is necessary to keep the TouchID button, something I'd choose over every design compromise.... The top bezel is mostly a design choice to keep a "symmetric" style: maybe they can work on that only.

----------

It will happen eventually when they figure a better way of implementing touch ID.
Regarding thin devices, it's inevitable and I think they will get thinner. Usually electronic devices are thick due to technology limitations.

They are approaching structural limits (see that ridiculous bendgate issue), so unless they aren't going to use another material, I can't see a thinner iPhone in the near future.

----------

A9 gonna be still dual core then, if they keep making those chips smaller.
but if the performance gains a lot without draining battery, i'm all for it.

I suspect the A9 to be a quad core.

----------


That's a good point, in my opinion. Considering the relationship between Apple and Samsung, I don't know why Apple will still rely on them to produce their CPU, since TSMC proved themself to be a valid partner.

----------

Why Samsung's chip side is a total seprrate company from Samsung mobile.

Totally separate? I wouldn't bet on it.

----------

If you look back to 2010 - the iPhone 4 - you can see there is quite a considerable reduction in bezel between the 4 and the 6.

Image

My point exactly. Side bezels were reduced. Bottom bezel is at the minimum possible size to allow the presence of a physical button. The only possible way to farther reduce them is to work on the top one. But that's a design choice....
 
Anything is better than the "Soft" buttons on the Nexus devices.

God they sucked so much, quit everything accidentally. :apple:

As a Nexus 7 owner I can say that software buttons have advantages, but they are just not compatible with the presence of TouchID, that I consider a primary feature of the iPhone. I also like the capacitive buttons of my Lumia: they are a good compromise between soft and physical.

----------

Sorry stupid question here: what happens after 14? 7? 3.5? Then what? Does the chip cease to exist? Lol

Nanometer isn't the smaller unit of measurement :D
Below that starts Picometer....

With the current technology I think we can't go pass 10 nm, after that quantum tunneling became a factor.
But they are working on other technologies....

----------

Same thing that happened from cm to um to nm. You can call the 14 nm process the 14,000 picometer process if you want. There are still micron processes being used out there. Once we get down to the atomic scale, we will have to go to the subatomic scale, which would be quantum computers. And those are a very very long way off.

It's not that easy, unfortunately :D

----------

And bendy.

Not unless you take a seat on it......

----------

I can't wait until Samsung goes out of business. I'll never buy a Samsung product. I wish Apple would stop using Samsung.

:rolleyes:

Disclaimer: Sarcasm

Well, out of sarcasm I think they should avoid doing business partnership with Samsung.
I see very little sense in suing a company for stealing while I'm providing them projects for my next SoC, don't you?

----------

So that's how it is? We either get this:

View attachment 499967

or this:

View attachment 499968

I think there may be a wee bit of middle ground between the two extremes, dude.

You could just avoid doing something so stupid like the thing pictured in your first photo..... A phone it's not intended to be hold with two hands and pulled while your two thumbs are pushing forward applying full force on a single point of the frame. Get over it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.