It's fun. No other reason needed.Why? Are you going to drive with your headset on? If you are, let me know so I can get off the road.
It was DOA because of its price point not its design or function. Most consumers can’t shell out $4000 for this type item, but most would if they were $1000…Of all the things to release it's a DOA product Apple couldn't convince people to buy. These companies need to focus on something else besides goofy ass wearables. Some slick sunglasses with tech, sure, but these are pointless.
Why on earth hasn't Apple created a Vision OS-native version of Maps? Crazy that Samsung/Google are getting there first. Such an obvious use case.
And does nobody use maps when they aren't driving, to plan out a route?
Same. I expect Virtual Desktop will be available as for Play For Dream.If it can be used for PCVR and is competitive with whatever Oculus is offering, I’m interested.
Google Earth, yes. I can see the case for that. Maps... not so much. I use maps when not driving to look up locations and routes but it is usually a quick thing. Now if Apple were to add photo and VR features to Maps, that would make it a priority for me.It's fun. No other reason needed.
I've spent quite a lot of time exploring in Google Earth VR.
They could even combine it with photos, so you could see where photos were taken.
And does nobody use maps when they aren't driving, to plan out a route?
Of all the things to release it's a DOA product Apple couldn't convince people to buy. These companies need to focus on something else besides goofy ass wearables. Some slick sunglasses with tech, sure, but these are pointless.
The irony of being 18 months late but still being more useful than the VP.
The AVP is the first headset that didn't make me want to immediately puke. When I switched to a 3rd party headband that properly supported the front and back the weight issue and comfort all were fixed. That said I returned it before the 30 day period because I just wanted the display slightly sharper especially for passthrough.Personally, I have zero interest in VR or AR. The headsets are huge, heavy, and uncomfortable, plus they can cause motion sickness. The novelty wears off after 20–30 minutes. It’s just not practical, and the tech still feels pretty half-baked to me.
The part that will hurt is for Apple is...
Apple - $3,499
Samsung - $1,899? And likely to have better specs.
It should be noted they only made around 400k units in the first place. Apple had no intention of this being a mass market product. I look at the AVP as I do the high end mac studio or mac pro. For those that want the best experience or need a serious productivity device you use the AVP. If you want games get a cheaper QuestReally?
Apple sold around 400,000 AVPs. Which yielded around $1.4 Billion in additional revenue for Apple.
As a former android developer, I wouldnt even say its laziness, Google’s developer tools are really garbage. And the play store console is horrible and Google can sometimes take MONTHS to approve an app update. Android lost like 1-2 million apps this last year because of how bad the play console has been lately and developers are giving up.More useful? With whatever pathetic processor they decide to use? With Android developers too lazy to target anything other than phones (they can’t even bother to develop for tablets and people think they’ll target a device with a fraction of the market)?
Perhaps that would overlap with the use case for their smart glasses?Why on earth hasn't Apple created a Vision OS-native version of Maps? Crazy that Samsung/Google are getting there first. Such an obvious use case.
Anything above $2,000 will be a hard sell, imoCompetition is a good thing, will be interesting to see their pricing...
Sounds about right, might be $1,999The part that will hurt is for Apple is...
Apple - $3,499
Samsung - $1,899? And likely to have better specs.
Nah, Samsung is not going to leave that much money on the table. $2999 is more likelyThe part that will hurt is for Apple is...
Apple - $3,499
Samsung - $1,899? And likely to have better specs.
As an AVP owner, that processor isnt going to be $2,000 better, I mean $1,600. Lol. Let's see how the benchmarks are tomorrow.Better specs. Laughable. First neither Samsung or Qualcomm have a processor that can touch Apple. That’s before you add in a dedicated co-processor like Apple does with the R1.
It takes power to process multiple camera inputs and it takes a lot of power to drive high resulting displays at a high refresh rate.
Snapdragon Elite is too power hungry for a mobile device and gets slaughtered in GPU performance by Apple.