Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Because it sounds more stupid and unnatural than Animoji.

Not a minute into the presentation and the guy dissed Apple for ditching TouchID and the Headphone Jack. Then went on to copy Animoji (creepily) and faceID (not as securely).

The sheer level of RDF in this thread is off the charts. Why can't Apple fans just be happy with their devices? Why do they have to diss the competition?
[doublepost=1519611546][/doublepost]
Didn't the Nokia N86 have variable aperture?

Who cares? Samsung will bring variable aperture to the masses, much like Apple with wireless charging. It's not about who's FIRST!
 
Hm, I guess these personalized emoji are at least a little more interesting than Apple's canned poop faces and unicorns if you're into this kind of thing.

Anyway, I applaud Samsung for keeping a headphone jack (which I have missed on more than a few occasions on my iPhone 8). Also much prefer their thin bezels to The Notch. Too bad it doesn't run iOS ...

No notch...
I love this design better than notch. Notch is just an abomination on the screen.
 
Their version of Animoji looks very rushed. The facial expressions are "quirky" to say the least with flickering cheeks and eyes. Also the actual design of the avatars looks quite cheap. Very poor shading and lack of tessellation. Sort of animation you see in cheap children's films from no-name studios in bargain bins.

But I do commend Samsung on that camera. Having an adjustable aperture on a mainstream phone and not just a very niche oddity device is a big deal, something we may see others do now that they've lead the way, that is innovation.

The phone in general looks nice, I personally think the top and bottom could be made a bit thinner so the screen looks more edge to edge but at-least they moved the fingerprint reader and innovated on the camera.
 
Not a bad phone. The camera looks pretty nice but overall....not ground-breaking for me. Going to stick with my s7 edge another year. Plus the other half would kill me if I got a new phone:D saving for a wedding is more important.
 
Bezel on top and bottom...
[doublepost=1519612392][/doublepost]So much criticism to Apple for using the same design, yet Samsung keeps the same design and nobody seems to care.

And the iPhone x has an 8mm notch and 4mm black bezel all the way around ;) ;

gsmarena_002 (1).jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shirasaki
The camera is amazing. Specially the low light feature.
Although AR Emoji might not be everybody's preferred style but for sure it is a innovation further expanded.
We will see how the software specifications and features prevail in daily use.
 
This thread is more balanced and civil than I expected.

It looks like a nice little phone. If it ran iOS, I'd probably buy it. But it doesn't so I won't.
 
This whole headphone jack debate is still killing me. I'm 31 years old, and I work in the medical field with other younger workers that use a lot of Apple products (watches and phones), and literally nobody ever says anything about the headphone jack. Everyone just owns bluetooth headphones.

There are probably a few people that were annoyed at first, but most of the younger millennial tech users (which is what Apple is marketing to) have gotten over it by now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FFR and doelcm82
I know people complain about how Apple "doesn't innovate" and I've seen complaints this morning (Australian Time) about how Samsung only realy did minimal improvements which I think are good especially for the camera but I think this is now the new norm. We've reached the mature stage for smartphones which means we won't see Wow factor features every year. They'd probably be released every two or maybe three years.
 
This actually looks... really cool! I honestly like the idea of this "AR Emoji" feature more than Animoji. It's cool to make emojis of yourself! And the licensed Disney emojis make Animoji look like a cheap knockoff, hahah. And 960fps in 720p is an incredible accomplishment for a phone camera! But Android manufacturers are still too dumb to implement/copy Apple's best iPhone feature: iMessage. That alone will probably keep me on iPhone. lol.
 
Omg can we just get better battery life ? Enough gimmicks

It's only a gimmick until apple gets the feature right??? Just like how everyone said that wireless charging was a gimmick, now that apple has it it's an awesome feature RIGHT!!!????

What’s with the super slow motion only lasting for 0.2 seconds? I thought it was a misprint and it was 2.0 seconds. What good is that?

I think what it is saying is that a 2 milli second video will be changed to 6 seconds. You can take a longer slow mo video in turn after it's processed it will just a longer video..


James
 
  • Like
Reactions: Delgibbons
What’s with the super slow motion only lasting for 0.2 seconds? I thought it was a misprint and it was 2.0 seconds. What good is that?
I didn’t watch the video, but the article has some bad math; it says 2 ms of video turns into 6 seconds. But 2 ms @ 960fps will only capture 2 frames.
 
It’s not for low light. Smaller apertures give greater DOF (depth of field). Large apertures give shallow DOF (great for portraits to soften the background).

However, with a range from f1.5-f2.4, there’s not much range at all (a typical SLR lens would have a much wider range, like f2.8-f22, for example).
What you said about DoF is all true for cameras with larger senors, like a SLR or mirror-less micro 4/3, but less so for a camera phone.

Camera phone have much smaller sensors, so have lenses with focal lengths of only a few millimeters. I think the iPhone's lenses are 4mm and 6.6mm. Even at f/1.5 or f/1.8 these lenses have a DoF that extends to infinity, unless focuses on a object very close to the camera (I'd guess, less a foot away). The fact that camera phones can't blur the background optically like an SLR, is the reason Apple, Samsung, Google etc, have portrait modes that blur the background computationally.

Most camera phones have a fix aperture lens and alter ISO and exposure time, depending on the light. It seems Samsung have a lens that can be set to f/1.5 or f/2.4. For low light situations f/1.5 will let in as much light was possible, I am just guessing, but f/2.4 might be slightly sharper and have larger DoF at very short focal distances.

As you said a SLR lens will topically range from about f/2.8 to f/22, depending on the focal length. Camera phone lenses don't go much passed about f/2.8, again due to the small sensor. F-stop is a measure of the aperture as a faction of the focal length of the lens, a 4mm lens at f/16 would mean the diameter of the aperture would be 0.25mm so small that the camera is Diffraction-limited and the image becomes less shape. SLR become diffraction-limited at around f/8 camera phones it is about f/2.8, so their lens don't have apertures smaller than this.
 
How many of iPhone users really use the iPhone to the full potential?

Hey... i put my email checking and text messages to the test! Mad power user! :D

jk. In all seriousness.... is anyone else not happy with the iPhone camera? All everyone says is how awesome it is... but both my wife and I (shes still on the 7, i'm on the X)... have noticeable lag time taking photos. I had it on my 7 Plus... hoped it would not be there on the X. When i hit the button to take a picture, it sometimes takes up to 3-4 seconds to take the picture. We have a 3 year old girl and twin one-year old baby girls... anyone want to care to take a guess at whether or not they are still in the frame after 3 seconds.
 
You guys get that TouchID needs to be able to 'see' your fingerprints and other phone activities do not, right?

Exactly. I wear Mechanix gloves while working. I cant activate Touch ID with them on, but I can use the screen once unlocked.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.