Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Bet you don't use nice wired headphones - when wireless headphone technology overtakes wired headphone technology then perhaps the "legacy" technology's time is up. For the near future I won't be buying any phone without a headphone jack, nor a computer without a variety of USB and SD ports. You can bet that the designer of this phone did some math before deciding not to ditch the headphone jack. Iphone users who continue to buy iPhones regardless of missing sound jacks wouldn't be swayed to Android by its inclusion of a jack (or lack thereof). Former iPhone users, who miss the headphone jack, will gravitate to companies who still provide it. If it wasn't a big deal, there wouldn't be so many folks who still bemoan the loss of the jack on iPhones. I hope Samsung (and other phone manufacturers) continue to understand that.

First of all, an iPhone not having a ¼" headphone jack does not mean you can't use your existing wired headphones. You'd just need to use the provided adapter. Of course there will be situations where you'll want to charge and listen to wired headphones at the same time, but that's also been taken care of with inductive charging, so that argument doesn't work as well anymore.

Second, wireless headphones have progressed significantly in the past couple of years. They're not what they used to be and can be better than some wired headphones. Is there more work to be done - of course, but that brings me to my third point.

Third, like so many things, it often takes a purposeful change away from the status quo in order to improve and move forward. And at these times of change, there will always be unhappy consumers not wanting to change and move forward, often for very good reasons, but not moving forward to satisfy some, ends up holding everyone else behind. I can name countless examples, from 45 records to 8 track tape, to cassette taps to CD's to DVD's to MP3's. Or tube televisions to LCD to OLED. Multi-pin computer connections to USB-A to USB-C. 8" floppy disk to 5.25" floppy disk to CD to DVD to USB drives. At some point each technology had millions of everyday users that ended up having to change in order to move ahead with something that was clearly better - even if it wasn't clear to everyone at the time it was happening.

In the case of very expensive wired studio-quality headphones, they're also unfortunately such a small segment of the overall market, that they effectively become meaningless for most manufacturers to chase after. It's much like the market for tube amplifiers / receivers and high end loudspeakers. There is definitely a market for both, but it's small and for a mass market company like Apple, or Samsung for that matter, they're just not going to jump in and try to serve that segment - offering a headphone jack on their smartphone is at this point more of a marketing ploy than anything else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Abazigal
Samsung can mock the notch all they like, fact is their phone looks positively ancient with those massive bezels.

I don't mind the top/bottom (no side ones at all compared to anyone else) bezels that much on my Samsung phones, though my LG V30 has slightly slimmer ones. What I don't like is the full screen notch on the iPhone. I wish it did bezel mode and at least blacked out the two pockets to make a straight edge. I do like how Samsung does the black barring of 16:9 though a lot more. You can pick up the phone and touch the screen in those spots without disturbing anything while my X doesn't behave the same way. Not a huge deal just a minor nitpick.
 
I haven’t seen many changes in years.
[doublepost=1519755425][/doublepost]

I don’t think there’s a ton of difference when it comes to photos from any high end smartphone.
Certainly the average person wouldn’t notice any difference
 
Bet you don't use nice wired headphones - when wireless headphone technology overtakes wired headphone technology then perhaps the "legacy" technology's time is up. For the near future I won't be buying any phone without a headphone jack, nor a computer without a variety of USB and SD ports. You can bet that the designer of this phone did some math before deciding not to ditch the headphone jack. Iphone users who continue to buy iPhones regardless of missing sound jacks wouldn't be swayed to Android by its inclusion of a jack (or lack thereof). Former iPhone users, who miss the headphone jack, will gravitate to companies who still provide it. If it wasn't a big deal, there wouldn't be so many folks who still bemoan the loss of the jack on iPhones. I hope Samsung (and other phone manufacturers) continue to understand that.

This was my headphone collection prior to me getting the Airpods.

cbcc20b2c197e8fb8220700ac6dddcd6.jpg


Haven’t touched any of them at all since the day my Airpods arrived.

Tried my Sony headphones the other day and the feel of wires around my neck made me take them off less than a minute later.

That’s how much the Airpods have spoiled me.
 
I don’t think there’s a ton of difference when it comes to photos from any high end smartphone.

Maybe not a "ton". But there are differences. Apple has been the leader since the original iPhone. But in the last 2 years they lost the lead. That is a pretty important loss for Apple since it was one of its features that set it apart from the rest.
 
Massive bezels? Lol, really? All of Samsung's phones have had better screen to body ratio than any iPhone before the X. All of a sudden you're so concerned with bezels? Lol. Have you called out Apple for the ridiculously huge bezels on all other iPhones? Have you called them ancient? You know what's ancient looking? The massive side bezels on the X. Just to give you a reality check, the S8/+ and S9/+ all have a better screen to body ratio than the iPhone X. And it's done without the hideous notch.

Yep, absolutely ancient, including the old iPhones. The side bezels on the X don't bother me at all, and the screen spilling over and distorting on the S7/8/9 does, so I see it as a negative. The notch is functional, and unnoticeable in use.
 
Yep, absolutely ancient, including the old iPhones. The side bezels on the X don't bother me at all, and the screen spilling over and distorting on the S7/8/9 does, so I see it as a negative. The notch is functional, and unnoticeable in use.
Lol I bet not once in the past you called out previous iPhones massive bezels. I can also bet you probably defended it that you like it like that.

The curve sides are functional and unnoticeable in use. See how that works?

You called out Samsung phones for huge bezels when the total amount of bezels on the X is more than the S9 or S8. Please help me understand how that statement makes any logical sense.

P.S. I don't like curve edged phones like Samsung mainly because I need a screen protector on my phone due to the way I handle my devices. Curve edges and screen protectors don't work well together. However, you're being contradictory in your statements so please clarify.
 
Lol I bet not once in the past you called out previous iPhones massive bezels. I can also bet you probably defended it that you like it like that.

The curve sides are functional and unnoticeable in use. See how that works?

You called out Samsung phones for huge bezels when the total amount of bezels on the X is more than the S9 or S8. Please help me understand how that statement makes any logical sense.

P.S. I don't like curve edged phones like Samsung mainly because I need a screen protector on my phone due to the way I handle my devices. Curve edges and screen protectors don't work well together. However, you're being contradictory in your statements so please clarify.

Total is irrelevant (to me), as it is uniformly distributed all around. Chin and forehead look ancient and the notch is a great way around this.
 
Total is irrelevant (to me), as it is uniformly distributed all around. Chin and forehead look ancient and the notch is a great way around this.
How is it uniformly distributed all around when there is a notch? Lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mi7chy
I will wait for the tests of the Galaxy S9 before judging it.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
galaxy s7 galaxy s9
 
Last edited:
Maybe not a "ton". But there are differences. Apple has been the leader since the original iPhone. But in the last 2 years they lost the lead. That is a pretty important loss for Apple since it was one of its features that set it apart from the rest.

Haha okay. DxO rated the Pixel 2 at 98 and iPhone X at 97. I guess that extra 1 point makes up for the build quality and screen of the pixel. They all have great cameras, simple as that. I’m not missing out on that 1 point.
 
Who really cares about emojis? Sadly I already know the answer to this question. I can't believe one of the major selling points of a modern smartphone is emojis.
[doublepost=1519596321][/doublepost]

They are not selling Emojis. They are selling a unique, fun and creative way to express yourself and communicate with others. Big difference there.

And i'm not sure why people complain about what they perceive as "useless" features.... the engineering that goes into that leads to new features and capabilities that would not be possible without the research and development. The Animoji and AR Emoji features are merely implementations of cool new technology under the hood. That technology can and will be used for so much more.
[doublepost=1519856283][/doublepost]
[doublepost=1519597712][/doublepost]

Oh look. They kept the ugly bezels.
[doublepost=1519597755][/doublepost]
No, it still has ugly bezels for 2012. Nothing edgelss about this.

Have you ever used a phone without bezels? Maybe there's a usability reason for keeping them? Or would you rather no bezels because it looks cool over an actual usable device?
 
The worst part of the Samsung phones is the screen wrapping over the edges. Adds nothing but distortion and random inputs. They should focus on removing the top and bottom bezels.
[doublepost=1519857118][/doublepost]
Haha okay. DxO rated the Pixel 2 at 98 and iPhone X at 97. I guess that extra 1 point makes up for the build quality and screen of the pixel. They all have great cameras, simple as that. I’m not missing out on that 1 point.
They also rated the iPhone X higher than Pixel 2 in still images.
 
so you wanna tell me that this:
iphone-x-no-notch-800x377.jpg


has more screen at the top than this:

1*y4efsBVytWsNzNOsphR-Bg.png


cause if that's the case i'm gonna call an ambulance and they should take you to the hospital to get your brain checked

Check out the videos. You don't get it huh? If you want to expand the videos/website/etc to the point where it the notch is not in the way. It shrinks it both sides hence it makes the screen smaller. It wants to center everything. If you expand it all the way, some of your content will be cut off because of the notch which is annoying. The notch design is awful, but you're a huge apple fanboy. You eat up everything apple does. Sorry I'm not like you. If something apple does well, I'll give them credit for it but if something they do bad I have no problem calling them out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mi7chy
According to DisplayMate, S9 has the best display ever on a mobile device. Was it ever in doubt? Seriously, the name Samsung, and the words "best display ever" are synonymous in the mobile world.

The Galaxy S9 matches or sets new Smartphone Display Performance Records for:

· Highest Absolute Color Accuracy (0.7 JNCD) – Visually Indistinguishable From Perfect.
· Smallest Luminance Shifts with Varying Picture Content for OLEDs (6 percent).
· Highest Peak Display Brightness (1,130 nits).
· Largest Native Color Gamut (113% DCI-P3 and 141% sRGB / Rec.709).
· Highest Contrast Ratio (Infinite).
· Lowest Screen Reflectance (4.4 percent).
· Highest Contrast Rating in Ambient Light (257).
· Smallest Brightness Variation with Viewing Angle (29 percent at 30 degrees).
· Smallest Color Variation of White with Viewing Angle (1.1 JNCD at 30 degrees).
· Highest Screen Resolution 3K (2960x1440) – 4K does not appear visually sharper on a Smartphone.

Source
 
According to DisplayMate, S9 has the best display ever on a mobile device. Was it ever in doubt? Seriously, the name Samsung, and the words "best display ever" are synonymous in the mobile world.

The Galaxy S9 matches or sets new Smartphone Display Performance Records for:

· Highest Absolute Color Accuracy (0.7 JNCD) – Visually Indistinguishable From Perfect.
· Smallest Luminance Shifts with Varying Picture Content for OLEDs (6 percent).
· Highest Peak Display Brightness (1,130 nits).
· Largest Native Color Gamut (113% DCI-P3 and 141% sRGB / Rec.709).
· Highest Contrast Ratio (Infinite).
· Lowest Screen Reflectance (4.4 percent).
· Highest Contrast Rating in Ambient Light (257).
· Smallest Brightness Variation with Viewing Angle (29 percent at 30 degrees).
· Smallest Color Variation of White with Viewing Angle (1.1 JNCD at 30 degrees).
· Highest Screen Resolution 3K (2960x1440) – 4K does not appear visually sharper on a Smartphone.

Source

Not surprising at all. They took the display that Apple developed last year and made it better. It's a newer phone, it should be better. And the X later this year will be better than the S9. And so on and so on...
 
Not surprising at all. They took the display that Apple developed last year and made it better. It's a newer phone, it should be better. And the X later this year will be better than the S9. And so on and so on...

LOL, yeah Apple is responsible for the Samsung's cutting edge display tech and innovation.
 
LOL, yeah Apple is responsible for the Samsung's cutting edge display tech and innovation.

I didn't say that at all, but yes Apple developed the OLED that Samsung manufactured for them last year. At the time, it was the best display in a mobile device, so yes it's reasonable to say Samsung took that and built on it. Their scale still remains very impressive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FFR
I didn't say that at all, but yes Apple developed the OLED that Samsung manufactured for them last year. At the time, it was the best display in a mobile device, so yes it's reasonable to say Samsung took that and built on it. Their scale still remains very impressive.

SMH, Apple didnt do squat to develop any OLED tech. It's all Samsung. All day, every day. You're drowning in the K-Aid. But hey, whatever floats you're boat.
 
SMH, Apple didnt do squat to develop any OLED tech. It's all Samsung. All day, every day. You're drowning in the K-Aid. But hey, whatever floats you're boat.

You could be right. Ultimately neither of us don't know for sure how much either party contributed to the final results, but in the end, I am good with it. I am happy with my X and it's screen and look forward to continued screen improvements.
 
Last edited:
Haha okay. DxO rated the Pixel 2 at 98 and iPhone X at 97. I guess that extra 1 point makes up for the build quality and screen of the pixel. They all have great cameras, simple as that. I’m not missing out on that 1 point.
I never said they were better phones. But Apple has lost the lead in photography that they had for many years.
 
SMH, Apple didnt do squat to develop any OLED tech. It's all Samsung. All day, every day. You're drowning in the K-Aid. But hey, whatever floats you're boat.
Actually it's not all samsung. Apple has lots of oled patents that are also being used in the X. But some people just can't accept that i suppose.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.