OK buy one do this and when it’s damaged I get warranty support. Don’t put too much faith in what Youtubers try using trial device is not paid out of pocket that they can prove to us all.
OK buy one do this and when it’s damaged I get warranty support. Don’t put too much faith in what Youtubers try using trial device is not paid out of pocket that they can prove to us all.
Got my pre-order in for the 512 Fold 3. iPhone users will obviously dismiss anything that Apple hasn't fed them yet but once they do, then it will be the greatest thing ever! Remember all the arguments about not needing or wanting AMOLED, Always On Display, 120hz, In screen Touch ID... Yea wait till you guys get 120hz and hopefully a fold this decade. 🤣
Just go into a Best Buy or Samsung store and touch and feel these new Galaxy devices of the last 2 years. They look like they are from the future compared to iPhone. Rather, the iPhone looks ancient compared to the tech that Samsung is putting out
Just go into a Best Buy or Samsung store and touch and feel these new Galaxy devices of the last 2 years. They look like they are from the future compared to iPhone. Rather, the iPhone looks ancient compared to the tech that Samsung is putting out
I did too. Plus an iPhone 13 in September. Plus an iPad Mini, if a new one comes out. And an Apple Watch 7.
This is going to be an expensive next few months.
Thats fine. OS is personal preference. As mentioned these phones are 3 years ahead of what Apple can do. The fold has TWO high resolution screens that are 120hz. The iPhone doesn’t even have one.And if you prefer iOS all the looks of the Samsung phones are irrelevant if the software isn’t to your tastes. People buy phones on more than just design and specs
Samsung phones don’t run iOS, that’s how there are still ‘apple fanboys’. The single most important feature of a phone is its OS. Wrong OS, no sale.Thats fine. OS is personal preference. As mentioned these phones are 3 years ahead of what Apple can do. The fold has TWO high resolution screens that are 120hz. The iPhone doesn’t even have one.
Under display camera compared to that abomination notch that the iPhone has had for years.
It’s real embarrassing for Apple. How are there still apple fanboys when the gulf in quality exists like this is beyond me. Samsung is just running up the score now.
Thats fine. OS is personal preference. As mentioned these phones are 3 years ahead of what Apple can do. The fold has TWO high resolution screens that are 120hz. The iPhone doesn’t even have one.
Under display camera compared to that abomination notch that the iPhone has had for years.
It’s real embarrassing for Apple. How are there still apple fanboys when the gulf in quality exists like this is beyond me. Samsung is just running up the score now.
Under display camera is good for content but produces awful photos. So I wouldn’t say this is a positive at this stage. We all know Apple wouldn’t release that until it was perfect and usable. Samsung are happy releasing it even if the quality is bad that’s the difference
I mean over 2.5 million second gen foldables shipped by Samsung is definitely not "hardly anyone".Can't have reports unless people are buying the product. Hardly anyone wants this nonsense.
I have to say this supposition is always fascinating to see.And for the "witty" comics who are saying that if Apple's name was on it people here would buy it....perhaps so because if Apple does it this technology will be done right.
That's quite condescending attitude.Samsung is enjoying the people testing this for them because the ones buying this right away just want to be first on the block to brag to their friends. That fold is so ugly only a diehard Samsung fan would try to pretend it's not noticeable.
I agree, it's not like Apple is the only company that can make good hardware. Samsung flagship hardware is cool. I know a number of people with Huawei flagship devices and they are solid and have really high spec hardware....8GB RAM, camera/optics licensed from Leica. good battery life. There is just too much politics and personal sensitivity (If you want to call it that) spreading into them. I stick with Apple's ecosystem because I have always used Mac computers since the 512K and only have to deal with "Win OS" crap at work on a few of the Video edit systems. Every time I have an issue with one of them, I just want to throw it on the floor and smash it.Can't hate on Samsung. Very impressed with Samsung. The 2021 Samsung line up looks great. Ahead of the game. Good job Samsung! Competition is great. Especially nowadays. Hopefully, Apple will be able to deliver some innovation.
Expecting for Apple's September event invites go out end of this monthCannot wait.
That is completely true in all aspects of tech. I think when I got my first Palm Treo 600 from Sprint...in 2003, it was almost $800.00 in contract.New tech is expensive.
People seem to forget that when the OG iPhone came out it was SUPER expensive for the time. New tech; expensive. After a few years it comes into lines with the market with scale.
We are already at the 3rd generation and you are still taking about the initial launch which was postponed, Samsung didn't pull any Foldable smartphone from the market.Yes, seeing busted screens and seeing Samsung pull the product told me to stay away of that release. Go roll your eyes at someone else.
By perfect I’m talking image quality. If the image quality is worse with under display camera then don’t bother. The quality needs to be the same all across. Notch or punch hole.What do you mean by "perfect"? Everything is a compromise. With the Fold 3, you would not use the under-screen camera for selfies. You'd use the main camera array and the front screen. The under-screen camera would only be used for video calls, where quality is not as important. So the compromise is poorer video call quality in exchange for better content consumption and aesthetics.
You say that Apple would not release something that was not perfect and usable. But Apples front facing camera system is in a big, black rectangle that significantly cuts into the screen space of the phone. If a "perfect" solution is a camera system that takes great images while not obscuring any screen, then Apple's solution is not "perfect". It is a compromise.
It is just an odd claim to make. If Apple only releases "perfect" solutions, why has their front facing camera array changed over the years? Is it "perfect" now? If so, why did Apple release all those other generations of imperfect cameras? Was it "perfect" with the iPhone 4 (the first iPhone to have a front facing camera)? If so, why has Apple been changing it?
I suggest thinking about things differently. Decide what is most important to you. Is it screen space? Is is video calling? Whatever it is, find a phone that best matches you needs and wants. Don't start from the premise that some corporation is perfect and the products they make are exactly what is right for you.
So which iteration of the iPhone front facing camera array was "perfect"? And why is "isn't a big deal for most people" considered "perfect"?By perfect I’m talking image quality. If the image quality is worse with under display camera then don’t bother. The quality needs to be the same all across. Notch or punch hole.
We all know the notch isn’t a big deal for most people but we know it’s there due to Face ID and no doubt it will go when under display camera is ready which at this stage it’s certainly not.
on foldables you can get away with it as there’s still another punch hole for the camera on the front display. On normal phones they wouldn’t release this
2.5M shipped isn't much especially when you're talking about worldwide shipping. Microsoft sold 2M+ Zunes in 2 years and where are the Zunes? lol. This foldable stuff is nonsense and it just shows that Samsung has no power of innovation. These devices are thick, gimmicky, have obvious design flaws and are designed for the first kid on the block with one to show off.I mean over 2.5 million second gen foldables shipped by Samsung is definitely not "hardly anyone".
I think I’m gonna get these, that way Apple can’t scan any of my photos. Samsung and Google would never
/S
Not $2.5M dollars, 2.5 million phones at over $1000 a crack. (billions!)$2.5M
Yeah I knew it was 2.5M phones shipped, especially since I did use the word SHIPPED in my last post, and I didn't use the $ when talking about the Zune. I"m sure you could see that $ was a typo.Not $2.5M dollars, 2.5 million phones at over $1000 a crack. (billions!)
We are talking about a new category of smartphones at the most premium prices so it's not really bad at all especially as Samsung met their sales targets each generation, Zune is irrelevant as a point of comparison with any Galaxy Fold.$2.5M shipped isn't much especially when you're talking about worldwide shipping. Microsoft sold 2M+ Zunes in 2 years and where are the Zunes? lol.
This foldable stuff is nonsense and it just shows that Samsung has no power of innovation.
These devices are thick, gimmicky, have obvious design flaws and are designed for the first kid on the block with one to show off.
Nope, I didn't.I"m sure you could see that $ was a typo.
Yeah, right, they didn't recoup the money the spent on development, that's why they didn't put out new versions...Oh yeah BILLIONS because there's no R&D to pay for, no employees to pay for, no materials or manufacturing costs involved, no distribution costs, just pure profit. 🙄
I hear you, but the Blackberry Pearl and Handspring Treo disagree with you.Maybe not by today's standards. At the time an average Smartphone would set you back less than $150-$200 with contract and maybe $300-$350 without. And most people had voice only phones so more in the $25-$50 range or "free" with contract. So Apple coming along and asking $500-$600 ($655-$786 adjusted for inflation) was crazy expensive. Especially for a "smart phone" with no keyboard, no apps or even basic copy & paste functionality. And without the subsidies of a plan it was that much more absurdly expensive compared to the rest of the market at the time since hardly anyone had spent $100 out of pocket for a phone, let alone six times as much.
So yeah, entering the market at four or more times the price of every other smart phone on the market was SUPER expensive. Even more so when you consider a large part of the cell phone owning public had never paid directly out of pocket for a phone before at all thanks to the phone contracts of the time regularly including them for "free".
You knew it was a typo especially when I said SHIPPED in the post. Doesn't matter anyway, this product will be history and forgotten about at some point soon.Also its not 2.5 million dollars, it's units sold at above 1000$ each so we are talking about billions of dollars in revenue. And this is revenue generated by a new category of product that didn't exist 3 years ago.