Hardly. It looks amazing! I find the Apple Watch boring looking and too much like jewelry. Not my thing. But I like bulky watched like this new Samsung and the Garmin Fenix 3HR below
![]()
They've butt ugly, but hey, whatever floats your boat.
Hardly. It looks amazing! I find the Apple Watch boring looking and too much like jewelry. Not my thing. But I like bulky watched like this new Samsung and the Garmin Fenix 3HR below
![]()
Out of all the updated "OS" i'm most interested in Watch OS 3First impressions just by looking at the video, it does indeed look awesome!
But I still am happy with the Apple Watch, and more importantly am waiting for OS3 than v2.
Although I'd gladly buy a brand new one if they introduce a round design!
Edit - Before this thread turns into a pissing contest, competition is good for us consumers people and I hope Apple and Samsung keep going at it to win our affection.. eerr money lol.![]()
Yeah, this is a grown up watch. I'm amazed it is samsung. Wonder if they used an outside design firm.
The 7th smartwatch from Samsung still hasn't sold as well as Apple's first Apple Watch.
many men like larger watches.
I hope Apple offers a larger AW next year. People with larger wrists, who like the aesthetics of big watches, want a larger screen, or require longer battery life would all benefit from a larger screen.
Apple f-ed up royally by waiting so long to make a larger phone, and as a result created a void which Samsung not only filled, but used to build their smartphone customer base. If Apple had set the market themselves and offered multiple sizes early on, Samsung would never have become a major player and Apple would enjoy much greater market share for both their hardware and iOS.
I really don't want them to repeat the same dumb, stubborn mistake by only making "small" watches and allowing the competition to gain a foothold in large watches, and then be forced to enter the large watch market much later, once people have already become Samsung users.
probably has terrible battery life. LTE is still too expensive for such a small device.
It's a really nice looking watch, why do you think it's ugly?
responding to texts? Answering calls? Siri (or some similar thing)?Most of the features work in iOS, though its still beta. All the notifications work and the watch apps can sync with the corresponding iOS apps, like mail and calendar. I think some of the Samsung only features, like Samsung/Android pay wont work, nor does Apple Pay.
Well, the question I was trying to answer was why, since that is what was asked. Merely throwing my opinion out there. It's not like I can disagree with actual tangible measurements.The reasoning doesn't change the actual dimensions of the watch though. In a classic marketing move, Apple's customer facing dimensions are the case dimensions only. That spec does not include the glass nor the sensor on the bottom. Is Apple alone in this practice? I have no idea. I'm making no judgments about the practice. Just pointing out that case dimensions do not equal watch dimensions and shouldn't be confused with each other.
I find the stupidity of a wrist computer trying to imitate pre steam-era tech offensive.
this is what I found comparing a square face to a round face:
To me, there is something very attractive about a larger Watch, from a males perspective at least. I have the stainless Apple Watch 42 MM, and as much as I love the size of the Watch, it's really not that big in terms of Invicta's and Omega's.
46 MM is large, but doable if you appreciate a larger Watch. I'm thinking Apple will offer a round Watch by Version 3, with larger variants.
So you're saying diver watches are ugly.
The size and OS does me no good[/B] but I like the design. Cool w/o the geek baggage. Of course it's a video so wonder if the display looks that good in daylight or if it has a decent screen refresh. I wish Apple would come out with something similar, but smaller. Maybe.