Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It's a tradeoff between size and function. With the Samsung, you get LTE, longer battery life. But compare the sizes:
Apple Watch 38mm: 38.6x33x10.5mm, 25g (Sport), 40g (Watch)
Apple Watch 42mm: 42x35.9x10.5mm, 30g (Sport), 50g (Watch)
Samsung S3 Classic: 49x46x12.9mm, 57g
Samsung S3 Frontier: 49x46x12.9mm, 62g
The Frontier is more than twice as heavy as the 42mm Apple Watch Sport.

These measurements are not accurate. Here's the 42mm Watch measurements from the Official Apple Band Design Guidelines:

42.5 x 38.03 x 12.46mm

Also, the Watch does not include the lug measurements which is why the Samsung measures larger than 46mm top to bottom. It's also the reason the watch industry measures their watches horizontally, rather than vertically as Apple does. The Watch lugs adds 3.46mm to each side. So the true measurements for a 42mm Watch are:

49.42 x 38.03 x 12.46mm

When you consider any round watch is wider than any square watch, that's not really a compromise, but an expectation.

So here's the actual comparison:

Apple Watch 49.42 x 38.03 x 12.46mm
Samsung S 49.00 x 46.00 x 12.9mm

They seem a lot closer now, don't they?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bice
Even though I have an Apple Watch in rotation with my Submariner, I prefer the round design for a few reasons, the most important being you can incorporate a screw down crown and bezel, with gaskets and tight tolerances instead of glue (AW).
 
The Apple Watch sucks. You have a semi thin device which has a crap battery life span. You don't have Samsung pay MST. You can't use Apple Pay everywhere you want. You can with Samsung pay even at gas stations but having to use a trick method.

The watch is ROUND which is already a winner. The rotating bezel UI is fantastic and if you think this watch is heavy have you ever tried on a Fenix HR? LOL, that's a $600 watch that has the worse junk "color" spinach screen display and the entire UI is slow. Sure it's fantastic as a sports watch mother of all metrics but that thing is a beast compared to any gear S watch. Apple got pwned is accurate way to say it.
The fact that it sucks is totally your opinion. Crap battery life? I end a day with at least 55%, and this is with me using it all day, 18 hours. I could go two days with it if I needed to. Apple Pay works at nearly every place around me, but yes, I can't use it at standard magnetic stripe readers, I'll give you that.

I prefer round traditional watches, but square smartwatches. The square shape is far more functional. Circular smartwatches have text and images cut off on the edges, which is not very functional because you need to scroll more to see the same amount of text that you would on a square display. I'm not sure how Apple got pwned here honestly. But hey, if you like the S3, that's awesome! It's a good thing that we have options to choose from, because not everyone wants the same thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Night Spring
I realize a lot of people are all fuzzy and nostalgic about the round springs, cogs, gears, pistons and levers look. I'm not one of those. I think it's insanely ugly. I find the stupidity of a wrist computer trying to imitate pre steam-era tech offensive.
Reminds me of this abomination
6cd2368bf7018141496ce7f94a4b557e419a4689.jpeg
 
Last edited:
While I am decidedly not a fan of any phone or tablet offered by Samsung since the entire market began, that really looks like a beautiful watch. At first I thought I was looking at a Tag-inspired device that must have some rudimentary smart functions, but then as the functions were shown I realized it was a full featured digital. The display seemed just right, with properly sized text and a nice layout.Of course seeing the actual watch made me realize that video was just an excellent rendering, and the real watch is not exactly delicate. Thats too bad. With Apple it was exactly the reverse - I thought the 42mm would be oversized, too chunky, and yet in person its actually quite slim. The Samsung looks as if it was dimensioned for lumberjack executives and pro wrestlers who fly in their spare time, and perhaps hipsters who will wear them on their pencil thin bodies as yet one more example of irony.


Since my early disdain for the Apple Watch I've grown to like it - even though I don't use 99 percent of what it can do. I think that Apple should produce a round bezel watch to augment their rectilinear offerings, if for no other reason than to appease customers who simply want a round watch. As to why I've come to appreciate it, if you guys don't mind the analogy, consider the pocket calculator...

I remember the first portable, battery operated calculators. They were chunky beasts, plastic with woodgrain accents, took a 9volt battery. Expensive too, and even though all they did was the basic four functions, they did them well and served us for a few years. Then people wanted more functions, so the basic four were supplemented with percents, parentheses and squares, and given operational memory. Meanwhile, they started getting smaller and lighter, with better battery performance. A few years later, HP came out with brilliant scientific calculators, followed shortly thereafter by Texas Instruments.

Then, one day while I was browsing through what passed for a consumer electronics store (I think it was Masters, the predecessor to Service Merchandise), I found a beautiful, small calculator. It seemed to be made of brushed aluminum. It was the size of a business card, maybe larger. The buttons had wonderful feel to them, and overall it just felt like a brilliant piece of design. It had only basic functions, and was also about 30 percent more expensive than the rest of the expanded feature, plastic calculators there. But I couldn't get it out of my head. If Jony Ive designed a calculator, that one was it.

And thats where we are right now, with the Apple Watch. Its a very fine piece of work that doesn't do everything under the sun. What it does, it does very well. The fit and finish is beyond comparison to everything else. It costs at least a third more than most of its competition, but most everyone that handles one ends up buying or at least wanting one.

Anyone who has been paying attention to calculators see where those things went: They became feature filled and very well designed indeed, before being subsumed into other categories, most notably phones. We have a few years ahead of us where we're going to see some pretty cool stuff out of these things. Probably pretty scary too.

I predict that the Watch ultimately will have some incredible features to it. We're so early in the watch game that a truly killer app is waiting a few months or even years down the road (I've written about this in earlier threads). There is one particular use for the Watch that I'm very surprised none of the other manufacturers have thought of it, and I am well convinced Apple envisioned the Watch for this sole use and everything else is just icing on that particular cake.
 
Last edited:
I currently have the Apple Watch, but it doesn't work with my new Note 7. I pre-ordered the Garmin Chronos and might take a look at the frontier version of the Gear S3. I wish it was slightly smaller than 46mm, but man I think the design is sexy.

My two biggest gripes with the Apple Watch are terrible battery (esp after a workout) and the square design. I much prefer circular watches.
Isn't the Chronos bigger than this? I do agree about the look for the S3. Really nice.
[doublepost=1472666329][/doublepost]
Oh my gosh...unless that thing has a propeller that pops out of the face, that is just impractical.
Some of us actually prefer larger watches. There's nothing impractical about them.
 
WOW, that is a very nice. It looks like a nice watch not the Inspector Gadget Apple Watch. Also, standard watch bands - not this stupidity of custom bands. Great on the always on feature - that black void on a wrist is just ugly!.
 
4 day battery life??? thats lit wonder how they did it, its good to have competition keeps everybody on their toes better for us!
 
Impressive? I'm not impressed at all. Where's the fitness apps? Texts? Looks flimsy. My Apple Watch has withstood my 6-6 day jobs in a factory. The circular bezel looks chinsy
By no means am I a Samsung fan but their previous watches aren't known for being flimsy and easy to break. If your concern is longevity, I am sure this thing will be able to take a beating at least as well as the Apple Watch can.

The most limiting factor of all these watches for those who use iOS is actually iOS itself. It's just not a good enough experience off of android IMO.
 
So here's the actual comparison:

Apple Watch 49.42 x 38.03 x 12.46mm
Samsung S 49.00 x 46.00 x 12.9mm

They seem a lot closer now, don't they?
Very interesting.

If the Samsung does have a lug to lug size of 49.0mm then it shouldn't wear big. The lugs look like they protrude more than 1.5mm each side of the case so the 46mm dimension must be including the pushers and I would imagine it's case size is closer to a normal 42mm watch.

20160831SYTL2OWFTBFSIDPUWXXLLMAY.jpg
 
Looks promising, unless you have small wrists. Then straight outta luck.
I'm tiny. I can wear the existing Gear S2 which does have 4G connectivity. I can wear the Classic. But I want the Frontier and it is indeed too big.

My husband is going to love this, though. He hasn't worn his Apple Watch since we got our free Gear S2s from AT&T when we bought our Note 7s. Even if my husband wants connectivity to his iPhone again, the Gear software for iOS will be released eventually. Some people are beta testing it now.

Watch faces for the Gear S2s are amazing. There is a huge variety of them. Fitness is measured by steps and the app also lets you record how much water you drink and does other cool things in conjunction with the sensors on the phones. Samsung has done very well. Someone mentioned texts, I know I can do texts on mine via either dictation or an interface that is sort of like texting using buttons like on flip phones. It works well in a pinch.

Basically what I miss so far is my Apple activity rings and my moon phase complication. I also like my collection of Apple Watch bands and I think the Apple Watch looks better on me. On a man or a woman with larger wrists, either Apple or Samsung watches are going to look good.

I do still love my Apple Watch. They're both good but I admit I like the freedom of being able to still be connected to cellular data and voice even if I don't have a phone on or near me. Battery life has been amazing so far. I easily get two full days. But I haven't tried Always On display yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 69Mustang
I wear the S2 Classic. I don't like the big side button on the S3 Classic. The S3 Frontier is more my style. I won't be upgrading though. Sticking with my S2 classic, and I'll wait for the S4.
 
Even though I have an Apple Watch in rotation with my Submariner, I prefer the round design for a few reasons, the most important being you can incorporate a screw down crown and bezel, with gaskets and tight tolerances instead of glue (AW).

Yes, that's why I'm dubious about the claim that the Watch 2 will have a real IPX8 certification with a specific depth rating. I don't know how they will do that with a watch that is glued together.

I prefer round traditional watches, but square smartwatches. The square shape is far more functional. Circular smartwatches have text and images cut off on the edges, which is not very functional because you need to scroll more to see the same amount of text that you would on a square display. I'm not sure how Apple got pwned here honestly. But hey, if you like the S3, that's awesome! It's a good thing that we have options to choose from, because not everyone wants the same thing.

This has totally been debunked extensively on this site. In fact, the Watch itself has text that is cut off and requires more scrolling on the 38mm than the 42mm. Add to that the purpose if the Watch is not to be a text reader, or a photo viewer, but to provide notifications at a glance. Even Jony Ive stated quite clearly that anything more than that and a person should probably pull out their phone. For that purpose round has been proven to serve every bit as useful as square. In fact with Apple's current thick bezels limiting display area, a comparable 42mm round watch will actually display more information than the 42mm Watch.

And that's the beauty of choice.
 
Well, everyone's been demanding LTE and smartphone independence. I guess now we'll see just how well that works out in real life.
 
The fact that it sucks is totally your opinion. Crap battery life? I end a day with at least 55%, and this is with me using it all day, 18 hours. I could go two days with it if I needed to. Apple Pay works at nearly every place around me, but yes, I can't use it at standard magnetic stripe readers, I'll give you that.

I prefer round traditional watches, but square smartwatches. The square shape is far more functional. Circular smartwatches have text and images cut off on the edges, which is not very functional because you need to scroll more to see the same amount of text that you would on a square display. I'm not sure how Apple got pwned here honestly. But hey, if you like the S3, that's awesome! It's a good thing that we have options to choose from, because not everyone wants the same thing.
The physical look aside (that's subjective) if this thing has god, lte, and a four day battery life, I'd think it's safe to say this will certainly best the Apple Watch in terms of features.

I'm very interested in seeing what sort of real world battery life this thing gets. As always, manufacturer estimates seem to be very liberal, at least compared to my usage patterns.
 
Well, everyone's been demanding LTE and smartphone independence. I guess now we'll see just how well that works out in real life.
And yet people in this very thread are already claiming the battery life will be horrible despite this being nothing more than a quick product announcement video lol. Sometimes the bias in these pages shocks me, though I know it shouldn't anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AppleScruff1
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.