Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Works of art, in my opinion. Also, Samsung made a stylus first. Apple naturally copied—they can try to pass it off as a drawing apparatus and call it the Apple “Pencil" but that’s laughable. LOL. No, Apple. Just...no. You made a stylus. Own up to it. Samsung also was the FIRST to make a foldable smartphone. They just SHAMED and DESTROYED Apple’s ID group. And it’s very affordabe, under $2,000.

So, yes, Samsung are designer leaders. The Koreans are known to be world-class designers. Daewoo, Hyundai, Samsung.

BONUS: The Samsung watch is a circle. iWatch is a rectangle. LOOOOOOOL. Circle is superior to a rectangle for watches. End of story.
Your comment is nothing more than pure opinion.
 
Because Apple are garbage right now and there's no chance of fixing that if people can't even admit the problem.

This comparison is a joke. The Samsung blows the XR not just out of the water but out of orbit. Admit that basic fact and maybe we can start moving forward.

Kind of like LeBron fanboys still screaming that he's the G.O.A.T. even with 6 finals losses vs. 6 finals wins. There's no getting through to these people. The only way they'd admit a phone was superior was if one slapped them in the face with an Apple logo on it. Otherwise, the brand worship will continue.

That said, the S10e looks like an awesome phone... and I don't even like Samsung. But I have NO loyalty to any brand. I buy whatever offering from anyone that best suits my needs... and in this case; headphone jack, microSD card slot, physical size (relatively compact though should be smaller still), and runs Android which lets me customize it to MY needs (not Apple's) is an easy choice.

If my Sony XZ1 Compact craps out on me any time soon, I know what I'm getting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iSilas
No, the iPhone 5 was and still is one of the nicest design for a phone... EVER. At the time, nothing came close.

Objectively wrong. iPhone 5 was hideous compared to the Samsung Galaxy at the time. One, the Home button was a circle so you had bigger bezels. Second, Apple used cheap aluminum that chipped and flaked. Third, Apple used glass panels for the top and bottom which is FUGLY, just like the antenna lines on the 6.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: iSilas and mi7chy
You have either a very short or very selective memory. When Android devices were faster benchmarks were all that mattered. When the iPhone started getting faster (and especially after the worlds first mobile 64bit iPhone 5S) suddenly they didn’t matter. It’s also when Anandtech was declared an Apple shill for telling the basic truth about A Series processors or that Geekbench was no longer a reliable test. I mean, it’s gotten so bad that people accuse benchmark companies of modifying their tests just to make the iPhone look better or accusing Apple of modifying iPhones to excel at specific benchmarks.

Then we started seeing all these new fabricated “benchmarks” (like App races). Android users desperately trying to move the goalposts to invent something they can get a win at vs the iPhone in regards to performance.
The reason why it mattered back then and why it doesn't today is because soc performance even on a low/mid range are more than adequate.
 
But it doesn’t. The screen is it and only in contrast and sharpness. I could care less about the SD cars, could care less about a 3.5 mm jack, could care less about 6 GB of RAM (Android has always had a lot more RAM).
Okay, okay. We get it. You're pretty emphatic that you could care less. But I think what the whole forum wants to know is... how much less could you care.:p:D A little bit? A whole lot?
 
Are you joking? In real world use every second you use the phone is a better experience because of the much better screen. And every app you use is faster because Apple's A12 is crippled by the RAM bottleneck anyway. And every photo you take is better because of the better camera. And you can take more of them because you weren't price gouged on internal storage.

TBF Apple wins if the FBI or a terrorist organisation are after you and your main priority is ensuring their agents have a hard time bypassing your FaceID. Unless you wear sunglasses and so turned off the attention requirement meaning those agents are free to unlock your phone with your unconscious/dead body. Is that real world use?

Please list all these Apps that run better. I can run them on my Note 9 right now and then on my S10+ next week to compare.

I predict the iPhone XS Max will slaughter them both as soon as you demand anything more intensive than sending text messages or browsing Facebook.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GuruZac
The reason why it mattered back then and why it doesn't today is because soc performance even on a low/mid range are more than adequate.

So when is Photoshop coming to Android? Oops, it’s not. But it’s coming to the iPad. Just like all the truly powerful Apps exist on iOS and not on Android.

I guess if you’ve never had the ability to run software that utilizes your processor then you wouldn’t care either way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GuruZac
I did exactly that when Apple released their current iPhones. If the Xr is the best Apple can do at 860€ I decided it was time to try some new things. My expectation was that I would have affirmed that Apple, the iPhone and iOS are the right things for me. In fact the opposite occurred and I'm now just waiting for a price drop on the S10/S10e.

While there were some moments I was about to give up on the experiment but now that I have dealt with what goes where and how, I can happily choose whatever phone I like based on what is the best phone… not the best phone that's near enough from Apple. A big difference. And I'm the big winner because of it. If the pendulum swings back to Apple for what I want from a phone its an easy switch back and now that I've busted out, preventing being trapped by the ecosystem, is easy to avoid.

Both iOS and Android have their strengths and to get the best of each you can't use one OS like you would the other. It just doesn't work and ends in failure.

I’m glad it worked out for you. Everyone is different and values different things in a platform. Once I weighed all the pros and cons, sticking with iOS and Apple made the most sense for me.
 
Really? Got a pretty solid memory of the Galaxy S2 vs the iPhone 4 arguments. It even had higher benchmarks than the 4S, which they loved.

A lot of Apple doomed with that news of course. Shouldn’t have tried to make their own chips. If they cared about performance they’d buy Qualcomm.
That was 8 years ago, you do understand that todays hardware is an overkill even in mid range phones. Samsung even limits it with 1080p recording only so that it doesn't cannibaliz its high-end S series sales. The only way I see it becoming relevant again is if these guys find new ways for us to use our phones like Samsung Dex or VR....
[doublepost=1552687984][/doublepost]
So when is Photoshop coming to Android? Oops, it’s not. But it’s coming to the iPad. Just like all the truly powerful Apps exist on iOS and not on Android.

I guess if you’ve never had the ability to run software that utilizes your processor then you wouldn’t care either way.
This is phone vs phone, PS would be useless on a screen this size, as for productivity on an iPad without mouse, file system, true multitasking, support for 3rd party accessories etc it's more like a proof of concept than an actual productivity pc replacement and it will stay that way as long as Macs exist. Apple wants you to buy both at the end.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: iSilas and Mendota
I think the XS and S10e is a more apt comparison due to all the skimping Apple pulled with the XR. Both the XS and S10e have a 5.8" OLED screen w/ a more compact form factor, similar premium feel, dual cameras, offer 4 or more GBs of ram, and are IP 68 water resistant.

The iPhone XR is an awkwardly positioned phone since it's a larger device than the XS, has the best battery life of the 3 2018 iPhones, and somehow has better signal for some than others w/ XS or XS Max devices. It's a good phone, don't get me wrong, but I think it's weird how the entry level flagship product has the best battery life.

The S10e wins hands down, no contest. Better screen, more RAM, more versatility, dual cameras, more customization, fast charging in the box, a headphone jack, much better LTE signal, and a more compact modern design.

I have the S10e and absolutely love it, minus the FP sensor on the power button. It is awkwardly placed. Sadly, I will have to go back to my iPhone for now because the S10 and S10+ are too expensive. These "flagship" prices are getting out of hand. Samsung prices tank early, so getting a S10 series device this time next year could be much more obtainable.

I really want to get the S10 or S10+ for the in display FP sensor since it isn't susceptible to sweat as much as a physical sensor. I also find FaceID so much better than the S10e's biometrics too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iSilas and Awesom-0
Are you joking? In real world use every second you use the phone is a better experience because of the much better screen. And every app you use is faster because Apple's A12 is crippled by the RAM bottleneck anyway. And every photo you take is better because of the better camera. And you can take more of them because you weren't price gouged on internal storage.
So to summarize, “on paper.” Got it, thanks.
 
I am just curious and don't mean to start a problem, but I wonder...how many of the commenters on this site (or just this post) are paid by Apple's competitors to post here?
 
You missed some things.

- Qualcomm vs Intel baseband radio
- 1080p vs near 720p
- OLED vs LCD
- virtually same display area while being physically smaller
- better battery life without near 720p compromise
- 128GB base storage vs 64GB
- micro SD storage expansion vs none
- better future proofing with 6GB vs 3GB DRAM
- 3.5mm audio jack vs none
- additional wide angle camera vs none
- reverse wireless charging for earbuds/watch vs none
- included fast charger vs slow charger
- included accessories vs none
- IP68 vs IP67
- more versatile OS with much fewer restrictions
- nicer design and build quality that doesn't look Fisher Price
- more convenient fingerprint biometric that doesn't require taking eyes off the road while driving

If you're unlocking your phone, you're about to take your eyes off the road while driving...you have at least a few good points here but they're lost to an obvious bias and outright misinformation.
 
You missed some things....

Responses in parenthesis:

- Qualcomm vs Intel baseband radio (on paper - unless one has proof)
- 1080p vs near 720p (true)
- OLED vs LCD (true, but from MR responses, some prefer LCD)
- virtually same display area while being physically smaller (okay, virtually)
- better battery life without near 720p compromise (again, subjective preference)
- 128GB base storage vs 64GB (true for base storage)
- micro SD storage expansion vs none (true)
- better future proofing with 6GB vs 3GB DRAM (false, this phone will easily last longer due to updates)
- 3.5mm audio jack vs none (the fact is true, the preference is subjective)
- additional wide angle camera vs none (true)
- reverse wireless charging for earbuds/watch vs none (true)
- included fast charger vs slow charger (true, not really fast vs slow, fast vs faster, depending on use case)
- included accessories vs none (subjective)
- IP68 vs IP67 (on paper better)
- more versatile OS with much fewer restrictions (false)
- nicer design and build quality that doesn't look Fisher Price (subjective)
- more convenient fingerprint biometric that doesn't require taking eyes off the road while driving (false, you still have to know where the fingerprint sensor is.

So out of the 17 points:

- 6 true
- 11 subjective

The one with the most weight is ios vs android and android to me loses. That is my objective list and subjective opinion.
 
This again..

Does Samsung run iOS? No? Then I don't give a crap. What does this have to do with the Mac or Apple?

You're comparing Apples to Lemons.

Although I agree with you, Samsung is Apple’s largest competitor, and if you compare these two phones, they are the direct competition to each other. But like you said, (and as I also mentioned earlier in this thread), you’re not choosing the hardware, the consumer is choosing the software platform, either iOS or android. That’s predominately what the user is remaining loyal to, hardware is merely a superficial layer.
 
I like the S10e. Dare I say that I prefer it over the iPhone XS? Now, if it only ran iOS...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.