It’s just a ski mask, like Apple’s and all the other vr headsets.Samsung is so gross. Zero ability to come up with original designs or ideas.
It’s just a ski mask, like Apple’s and all the other vr headsets.Samsung is so gross. Zero ability to come up with original designs or ideas.
Is there any law that Apple would be able to sue them cause this ain’t just copy cat inspiring but this is straight up identical and copying lol this is ridiculous
At its Unpacked event, Samsung showed off its upcoming "Project Moohan" AR/VR headset, which is designed to compete with the Vision Pro. Some users might even mistake the headset for a Vision Pro, given the design similarities.
![]()
Samsung is developing the headset in collaboration with Google, and it will run Google's Android XR operating system. Google introduced Android XR late last year. Android XR and Samsung's headset will support being immersed in a virtual environment or staying present in the real world, similar to how Apple allows Apple Vision Pro users to adjust the Vision Pro immersion level by activating or shutting out the real world passthrough view provided by cameras.
![]()
The headset from Samsung will support Google features like Gemini, Google's AI assistant, providing access to device controls and insight into what the wearer is seeing. Samsung has described Project Moohan as "lightweight" and "ergonomically optimized" for "maximum comfort," but no details on weight are available yet.
Project Moohan will be the first headset designed for Android XR, and it is set to launch later in 2025.
Article Link: Samsung's VR Headset Looks a Lot Like Apple Vision Pro
They’ll leapfrog Apple together with other brands with help of the open Android VR. Many developers will program for it instead of an uber expensive low volume closed AVP.It’s been 1.5 years since the introduction and a year since the launch of the Vision Pro, yet Samsung still only has a non-working demo at their event. That’s not a good sign, they need to step up!
Could it be, that Apple is not THAT wrong regarding the way, they constructed the AVP?Samsung is so gross. Zero ability to come up with original designs or ideas.
Yes, it’s iOS 18 with all the bells and whistles actually working and available in all languages now 😉Of course it does - it's what they're good at lately 😂
Even the upcoming OneUI 7 looks eerily similar to, you guessed it, iOS.
Depends… as it’s priced at $3.499 for certain.And it will flop like the AVP as well.
Are you a developer? Or have you ever developed for these platforms recently? Cause your comment most definitely tells me you never have as a developer I am. There’s nothing desirable as a developer to work with Android vs working with iOS. I will develop for any Apple platform any day before developing for any Android platform.. not to mention the revenue part..They may have copied the AVP aesthetic, but they are smartly going to have it running a far more open and desirable to develop for OS
The first iPhone was all Samsung hardware, only thing apple was the software.Is anything unique with Samsung anymore
Tim is the one who forgot to patent their work.Samsung is so gross. Zero ability to come up with original designs or ideas.
Seriously? Android auto? Nobody cares about it. As a software engineer I prefer Apple tools for development a million times over. Have you ever developed for both platforms to have an opinion over it? Framework quality as well the software that comes out of the pipeline it’s exponentially better on Apple platforms than anything on Android.. that’s something I’m shocked has taken so long for Google to get right..They’ll leapfrog Apple together with other brands with help of the open Android VR. Many developers will program for it instead of an uber expensive low volume closed AVP.
Like Android automotive vs CarPlay. Apple doesn’t stand a chance.
Copyright and patent law but Tim forgot to patent it.Is there any law that Apple would be able to sue them cause this ain’t just copy cat inspiring but this is straight up identical and copying lol this is ridiculous
I think he couldn’t patent it because it has done before.Copyright and patent law but Tim forgot to patent it.
Huh? Android Auto and CarPlay have about the same adoption rate 91% vs 93%. Link But I've never met anyone say they wouldn't buy a car if it didn't have Android Auto, and so many say they wouldn't buy car if it didn't have CarPlay. The garden is strong.They’ll leapfrog Apple together with other brands with help of the open Android VR. Many developers will program for it instead of an uber expensive low volume closed AVP.
Like Android automotive vs CarPlay. Apple doesn’t stand a chance.