Have you used a windoze machine lately? Have you tried to do anything remotely productive in an office setting with a windoze machine? It's like using a chalkboard to do word processing. The Mac ecosystem is so far ahead of everything else out there it isn't even close. I supply all my own equipment and support at work because I just couldn't take the productivity hit any longer. And it's been great. The only thing I do in windoze now is open up that creaky, heavy brick of a PC laptop every 3 months to change my central corporate password. And it's like stepping back into the nineties when I do it. Get some perspective - MS, Google, they both suck.
Apple always ignored comments about their products. Yes, even when Steve was in charge and overseeing every product update.
Many people on this site can only see what is in front of them because that is all that matters. Bigger battery, new form factor, more ports, lower price, faster updates. That is great and all but Apple did none of those things on a frequent basis when Steve was in charge. Did we forget that it was Steve who killed the disc drive? Was on stage introducing the MacBook Air with less ports and a big price point? The same MacBook Air that would become the foundation for future Mac notebooks.
None of the features I listed above would make big gains for Apple. Temporary spike in iPhone sales after a new form factor followed by a decline. Apple cannot sustain 20+ years of growth every singe quarter by churning out bigger batteries, more ports, and new form factors every year. These things matter much more to the people in this site than the average consumer. The people on this site make up a small fraction of the overall user base. There is only so many ports you can have and a battery can only get so big before product design looks like crap.
I keep on reading about Steve wouldn't do this and Steve would have done that. Steve Jobs would have been on board with less ports, thinner designs, and not lowering prices. People on this site were always complaining about the lack of product updates when Steve was in charge.
Every time an article about Apple and its plans to get into the electric/autonomous car business is posted it is met with "Focus on the iPhone." Apple no longer innovates." "What a waste of time." "Update the MacBook Pro." "More ports." That is because every one only focuses on what is in front of them.
Apple is looking to expand its core business which is the real boom that will drive growth. Not simply updating current products and call it a day. There is only one other company on this planet that is going all out in the electric car business on a massive scale and that is Tesla. Apple looks like they can be the 2nd. Use their massive resources to compete and thrive. Electric and autonomous cars will rely heavily on software. Apple knows software and can beat Tesla in that area. All other car manufactures are dipping their toes in that area but are not going all out. Only Apple and Tesla are looking to be pure electric and nothing else. It's innovative and progressive thinking that should be applauded but instead is shunned because it won't make my iPhone look different.
Which other giant tech company is innovating and making large profits from it? Alphabet gets the mass majority of its revenue from ads. Nothing innovative is driving their growth. They dip their toes into everything and have plenty of products and services end up in the garbage bin. Samsung was trying to pull their mobile unit out of a big slump along with just about every company that uses Android as a phone platform. No one has found a way to make a profit and succeed in that area like Apple. Sony is doing what they always do, MSFT still relies on its core business and dips their toes into whatever they want.
Steve would most likely have realized that the business Apple has now is maturing. It is going to see spikes and declines rather than quarter after quarter growth. Apple will still make massive amounts of profit and still have plenty of resources. However the core business needs to be expanded into something outside of another touch screen. It has to be more than just another Mac.
what is innovative about the iPhone 8 rumors?
I still don't understand how Tim Cook can decide to fit 5400 rpm physically spinning hard drives in $1000+ computers, and then turn around and say "We at Apple are committed to making THE BEST computers that we physically can"
This is what annoys me about him. He's not a tech guy, he has no idea, and just looks smug and lies thru his teeth to the public hoping most are too dumb to realise.
I'd actually love Apple to collapse in some ways so they got rid of these marketing idiots and got back to the core of their company and dumped all the old junk and REALLY made things the best that can like they pretend to now.
In your post you mentioned Tim leaving and Apple ending their social and political correctness. I'm asking you to explain what that has to do with the company's stock value?
Do you know who also wants to manipulate AAPL and make it cheap? Tim Cook. So he can continue Apple's stock buy back. Corrupt is right, conflict of interest right there.
And the Mac remains the most powerful computing platform in the world.
And the iPhone 8 rumours seem to point at nothing but innovation. It's as though Apple is going to skip a year!
People have lost faith in Apple's ability to innovate. Investors want to see a roadmap.
Tim just can't say "everyone will need one". That line does not work anymore.
Working within a large scale international Technology Corp. where we deploy both Windows and Macs, our experience is nothing like your hate filled tirade. As an engineer that loves his Macs and enjoys his stellar Windows experience, it's obvious that your bias is emotional and disturbing.Have you used a windoze machine lately? Have you tried to do anything remotely productive in an office setting with a windoze machine?
Ok, stupid question. He had 1.26m shares which he suddenly decided he wanted to sell. What happens if no-one wants to buy them? How come, at a time aapl shares are dropping so much, there are enough buyers out there to buy up all 1.26 million of them?
Or found a better mouse to chase....The difference between fat cats and starving ones is that they aren't sentimental and know when to move on if they want to eat.
The only thing I hope for, is that Apple focuses on its business and innovation and less about its stock price, or who buys it. If you start worrying about the price of the stock, you take your eyes off of what got you there in the first place.
Forstall is NOT the answer. He will never come back because he hates Jony. I wouldn't even want Scott running Apple. He doesn't have the IT factor. Seriously. Whenever I watched him on keynote years back, he looked like a creepy goof gabbing about.
Even if he was offered to run Apple, Jony and Tim would have to GO as per his demands. Otherwise, he's NOT the guy and nowhere as close to the level of Elon Musk. Not one bit. We'll never have another Steve Jobs but they could try to find someone who's similar to Elon and Steve as another " Tony Stark ".
But Cook? Hell to the no.
Williams? He's Cook's boy, so I don't trust him.
Cue? He's a drunken slob and needs to leave.
Schiller? Defensive loud mouth and needs a kick in the a--. Defensive = insecure. That's him.
Jony? Must leave immediately and go independent. He's burnt out and has too much power/control. Firing him would be the best move Apple would make in order to get fresh design language and reign in dandy crap that Cook's being approving of.
Craig? He's not bad and could have been a pretty good CEO. A far better choice than Cook.
Angela? I think she's working for the wrong company and needs to do something else. Tim recruited her for the wrong reasons.
You seemingly have a crystal ball to be so all-knowing and a very close friend of Steve to know so well what he would have done! I'm not going to comment on all the speculation/opinion of your post, but you seem confused about the ports/battery bit. People don't want 20+ years of bigger batteries or more ports. The batteries have become smaller and smaller with each thinner and thinner design, and less ports (down to one port on the Macbook). People just want some ports back and better battery life. The newer chipsets and CPU's have become very energy efficient, but we don't see longer use-times because Apple keeps making the batteries smaller and smaller.
Obviously what they are doing now (or not doing) isn't working much longer.
Becasue we’re all different.I have a Windows 10 PC which I hardly like to use. Why would anyone want to work with W10 when there is OX ? Windows was a mess +20 yrs ago and still is today. yes, AAPL has declined, but that is when one buys and I would not be surprised if post WWDC (in June) AAPL will see its performance curve head back upwards. As for hedge fund personnel, what good have they ever done legally for anyone?