Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Who would still want a intel iMac?
I'm allowed a new computer every 4 years at work. I've stretched this one out for 6. I can't wait anymore and honestly, they are going to support Intel chips in new OS versions for another 4 years. By that time, my computer update at work will be rolling around again AND I will know that the software developers have worked out the bugs for ARM chips.
 
You make it sound like their machine will just stop working.

The problem is no different than with phones or tablets or computers for the past couple of decades. There may be some buyer remorse, but I doubt anyone outside the tech-reader world will be livid.

And I don’t know what additional features you expect beyond the possibility of it being faster, which I’ve not bought into yet because I’ve heard this stuff before.
Not what said.
 
Last edited:
too bad he's wrong a lot.

Prosser's record is pretty good. Like Kuo, just over 75% of his predictions have been accurate (though, to be fair, several of Prosser's and Kuo's predictions/leaks are about things in the future, so we won't know whether their accuracy rate holds for quite a while).

Source: https://appletrack.org/leaderboard/ (I am not affiliated with this site)
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: Kjs100 and na1577
Or, who, you know, don’t want to be in the first wave of gamma testing the new Apple Silicon Macs.

There’s likely to be some sort of stumble, there usually is in v1.0 products.
And there are certain apps people rely on that won't get updated right away, and it remains to be seen what the Rosetta 2 hit will be in comparison to a recent Intel based unit. Some great potential, but a lot of unknowns here.
 
And run all of my macOS apps?
From this point of view it looks like that’s where the product line is heading. We are not yet, but on the way. All I’m saying is that we already got pretty much the same computing power in an iPhone Pro looking at single core performance. That’s pocket size. ARMs have been announced for the whole productline. Apple would not make such a move if the that baby was not superior to Intel chips. Already today you can hook up your iPhone using Airplay2 to whatever screen/monitor/tv set you got at your workstation. In case you need more realestate screenwise. It is likely immobile workstations such as an iMac will become obsolete in the near future. As much as I love the iMac for what it is.
 
Prosser's record is pretty good. Like Kuo, just over 75% of his predictions have been accurate (though, to be fair, several of Prosser's and Kuo's predictions/leaks are about things in the future, so we won't know whether their accuracy rate holds for quite a while).

Source: https://appletrack.org/leaderboard/ (I am not affiliated with this site)

Jon Prossnor was wrong about WWDC 2020. He got a lot of things wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: opiapr and na1577
Heh...heh...heh...

Or the kb...or the mouse...

Azrael.
[automerge]1595849965[/automerge]


But do you think Apple will delay the iPhone launch for any of those reasons?

Azrael.
[automerge]1595850061[/automerge]


That design certainly has had its day.

Azrael.
You know the forum software, just like every other forum, puts your name and particulars off the the left of your posts, right? No need to sign every post. Just looks redundant.
 
And there are certain apps people rely on that won't get updated right away, and it remains to be seen what the Rosetta 2 hit will be in comparison to a recent Intel based unit. Some great potential, but a lot of unknowns here.

Yes, I always say buy for today, and dream for tomorrow. Will Apple get the ARM working great? Yes they will! But it will take time to get all the Mac products to pass what Intel is delivering today. Like I have been saying, It is a fantastic time to get a new Mac now. Get AppleCare for 3 years and at the end of the 3 years evaluate the state of ARM processing. If you feel it is time to move. Sell the old computer or trade it in for credit at an Apple store.

The after market for these last Intel based Mac's should have tremendous resell value for people who want a little upgrade and have legacy software that will not allow them to upgrade to a ARM machine.
 
If one were to order a new CTO iMac 27", it shows delivery date of Sept 30 - Oct 7 while a base model is available Sept. 23 to Sept. 30, so that tends to imply something will happen on the 23 of September, about a month from now. The rumored 10th generation processor would need a iMac Pro level internal change to keep up with the higher power requirement unless they ship a lower powered design to fit the old iMac fairly modest cooling. The 5300 does seem likely as the GPU.
 
In Europe all the store availability dates for iMac moved from "not available for PickUp" to "Available for Pickup 18th of August" for ALL models except the highest Tier 27 Inch model wich moved from "not available for PickUp" to "Available for Pickup September 30th". - This happened yesterday.

I checked this in Germany, UK and Italy. Works out for all of them. It's a straight to the day Date for every store in several countries. Go do it yourself, all you need to look up is a postal code for the country so you can check on Apple Store availability instead of just the online store delivery timeframe.

I also checked the USA and Australia. Both still say "not available for PickUp".



Feels like something is happening Tuesday August 18th (possibly Monday 17th since the time new products get announced usually is late in the day for Europe). Highest Tier 27 inch might be late to the party for whatever reason you want to come up with.
Just checked the Canadian online Store. For the 4K 21" iMac, earliest delivery date is July 30th and none are available for pickup from the Apple Store. For the 27" 5K iMac, earliest delivery date is Aug.12 to 19 for the two lower-end models, and Sep.24 to Oct.1 for the top-end model. None are available for pickup from the Apple Store.
 
Remember blacktape242 that the iMac bezel has to be larger than a simple display to mount/glue it to the rest of the computer, particularly if rumors are true that a FaceID sensor pack and microphones will be at top. The sides probably could be smaller and the chin at the bottom could be smaller.
 
Rounding out the legacy products so that anyone who still wants to hold onto Intel aren't left out in the cold come winter.
 
Who would still want a intel iMac?
Actually I think this is a good question. I think a vast majority of iMac buyers buy iMac because of value, not the all-in-one form factor.

Let's suppose Mac mini is available with the same configuration and performance as iMac, including Apple-designed display, keyboard, and mouse/trackpad. I am betting a vast majority would pick Mac mini instead, as you can upgrade display or computer independently. The problem is, Mac mini is much more expensive than similarly configured iMac, while sporting wimpier GPU.

Once Macs switch to Apple Silicon, it will get superior integrated GPU with it. The performance gap between iMac and Mac mini will likely disappear (iMac Pro excluded), leaving only the price and lack of Apple-designed display (outside stratospherically priced Pro Display XDR) as the main barriers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tarantularock
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.