That. The iMac had its run. An iPad Pro and an external 6k display will deliver a better performance.
And run all of my macOS apps?
That. The iMac had its run. An iPad Pro and an external 6k display will deliver a better performance.
I'm allowed a new computer every 4 years at work. I've stretched this one out for 6. I can't wait anymore and honestly, they are going to support Intel chips in new OS versions for another 4 years. By that time, my computer update at work will be rolling around again AND I will know that the software developers have worked out the bugs for ARM chips.Who would still want a intel iMac?
Possibly, but the stand could be an optional add-on......Will a power cord be included in the box?
Not what said.You make it sound like their machine will just stop working.
The problem is no different than with phones or tablets or computers for the past couple of decades. There may be some buyer remorse, but I doubt anyone outside the tech-reader world will be livid.
And I don’t know what additional features you expect beyond the possibility of it being faster, which I’ve not bought into yet because I’ve heard this stuff before.
too bad he's wrong a lot.
People who need x86_64 virtualization or Boot Camp.Who would still want a intel iMac?
And there are certain apps people rely on that won't get updated right away, and it remains to be seen what the Rosetta 2 hit will be in comparison to a recent Intel based unit. Some great potential, but a lot of unknowns here.Or, who, you know, don’t want to be in the first wave of gamma testing the new Apple Silicon Macs.
There’s likely to be some sort of stumble, there usually is in v1.0 products.
iPad Pro delivers infinitely worse performance for running macOS and applications that require macOS.That. The iMac had its run. An iPad Pro and an external 6k display will deliver a better performance.
From this point of view it looks like that’s where the product line is heading. We are not yet, but on the way. All I’m saying is that we already got pretty much the same computing power in an iPhone Pro looking at single core performance. That’s pocket size. ARMs have been announced for the whole productline. Apple would not make such a move if the that baby was not superior to Intel chips. Already today you can hook up your iPhone using Airplay2 to whatever screen/monitor/tv set you got at your workstation. In case you need more realestate screenwise. It is likely immobile workstations such as an iMac will become obsolete in the near future. As much as I love the iMac for what it is.And run all of my macOS apps?
Prosser's record is pretty good. Like Kuo, just over 75% of his predictions have been accurate (though, to be fair, several of Prosser's and Kuo's predictions/leaks are about things in the future, so we won't know whether their accuracy rate holds for quite a while).
Source: https://appletrack.org/leaderboard/ (I am not affiliated with this site)
You know the forum software, just like every other forum, puts your name and particulars off the the left of your posts, right? No need to sign every post. Just looks redundant.Heh...heh...heh...
Or the kb...or the mouse...
Azrael.
[automerge]1595849965[/automerge]
But do you think Apple will delay the iPhone launch for any of those reasons?
Azrael.
[automerge]1595850061[/automerge]
That design certainly has had its day.
Azrael.
And there are certain apps people rely on that won't get updated right away, and it remains to be seen what the Rosetta 2 hit will be in comparison to a recent Intel based unit. Some great potential, but a lot of unknowns here.
No! The new iMac must be triangular, or the easily bored will lose interest!Very well said. Good design doesn’t need refreshes all the time. Shrink the bezels and maybe the chin a bit, the rest is good enough for me.
The rumor was end of year and something to do with micro led... but we don't really know.Anyones guess on if the iMac Pro may also get a spec bump?
I do. I want the last Intel iMac to use during following few years while apps are updated and compatibility bugs are ironed out. Also I use BootCamp for a few Windows games.Who would still want a intel iMac?
Just checked the Canadian online Store. For the 4K 21" iMac, earliest delivery date is July 30th and none are available for pickup from the Apple Store. For the 27" 5K iMac, earliest delivery date is Aug.12 to 19 for the two lower-end models, and Sep.24 to Oct.1 for the top-end model. None are available for pickup from the Apple Store.In Europe all the store availability dates for iMac moved from "not available for PickUp" to "Available for Pickup 18th of August" for ALL models except the highest Tier 27 Inch model wich moved from "not available for PickUp" to "Available for Pickup September 30th". - This happened yesterday.
I checked this in Germany, UK and Italy. Works out for all of them. It's a straight to the day Date for every store in several countries. Go do it yourself, all you need to look up is a postal code for the country so you can check on Apple Store availability instead of just the online store delivery timeframe.
I also checked the USA and Australia. Both still say "not available for PickUp".
Feels like something is happening Tuesday August 18th (possibly Monday 17th since the time new products get announced usually is late in the day for Europe). Highest Tier 27 inch might be late to the party for whatever reason you want to come up with.
No! The new iMac must be triangular, or the easily bored will lose interest!
That. The iMac had its run. An iPad Pro and an external 6k display will deliver a better performance.
Actually I think this is a good question. I think a vast majority of iMac buyers buy iMac because of value, not the all-in-one form factor.Who would still want a intel iMac?