Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Listen, I am NOT insulting anyone.

I am saying that Anuba will use ANYTHING as an insult – even made up stuff. And that even being danish is used as an insult (as he did in the swedish quote), not to mention "being right" was an insult, one can only assume that his comment about having Aspergers was meant as even bigger insult. Sheesh. Please read what I write, instead of just guessing.



Yes, propably. Again, I wasn't the one slinging the insult. Please direct your harm to the proper person.

Alright, alright, sorry!

I am tired, its 11:40 at night here in the UK!
 
No, you're creepy because your social skills can only be measured on the negative scale.
LOL, I'm sorry, but I do believe you're the last person in this thread to judge anything like that.

Let's assume for the sake of argument that I've been wrong about everything I've said, that I've made unfounded claims and whatever it is you've accused me of -- why would anyone respond to that the way you do?
Poor lad. New strategy from you: Now you're playing the victim-card …
If you recall, I began posting in this thread by merely disagreeing with your blanket statement, and soon after you began with your ad hominems.

If I encounter someone on a forum who I consider to be ignorant of the subject at hand, why would I jump all over them in a vindictive rampage and spew bile and insults like Hitler on acid?
Oh, great, another thinly veiled ad hominem :rolleyes:

But behind the personal attacks, you're asking why I would counter the way I countered you. I did so, because you kept misrepresenting what I said, and when you were made aware of that, you were the one using ad hominems and "spewing bile", calling me all sorts of things, and so on. Do you really think you're in a position to play a victim?


I converse politely regardless of whether I talk to intelligent or dimwitted individuals.
Wow! What a load of bollocks. Luckily I quoted everything you said, because that surpasses what was previosly the remark that was most distant from reality.


I did however make one hell of an exception for you, but I would be hard pressed not to as you're by far the most unpleasant human being I've encountered during my 14+ years on the web, and that's saying something considering I once talked to someone who claimed to be a serial killer.

Ah, I see. Once again you make an unfounded claim, only based on pure opinion, and you back it up with yet another claim, that is a) anecdotal, and b) totally irrelevant.

Alright, alright, sorry!

I am tired, its 11:40 at night here in the UK!

That's okay, it's an hour later here. I'm tired myself. :)
 
So far, most of the newer touchscreen phones which have been compared to the iphone have lacked much of what the iphone offers. However, I came across this article on Gizmodo about the HTC Touch HD which at least on paper seems to be a more formidable match. It seems that it may even include flash, and a slightly larger screen. Of course it runs on windows mobile, which is a downfall--but its also entertainment oriented and seems to have some of what the iphone lacks. We'll see I guess--but despite being an iphone owner I kinda hope this one gets released on AT&T's network. . .

http://gizmodo.com/5049914/htc-touch-hd-gets-beautifully-confirmed-in-official-shots-specs

Yuk....Friend of mind tried the latest HTC and he returned it after 1 week. Couldn't use the thing. He got a really good deal from Orange, but just couldn't handle it. All the features were unusable. He was used to an Itouch though and so he knew what the iphone was like. Alas o2 had noreception in his home so ended up sticking to a standard phone.

Still. Windows mobile was the problem and until they change that there is no competition as far as i'm concerned.
 
Even with all the iphone bugs it is still the best phone ever. I love it and nothing from any company will touch it for a long while. It is a great music phone. With a few mods to the camera and software it will be the best phone ever for a long while. It may take a while to do it but when the 3rd gen iphone comes out i believe it will be the complete package.
 
Excuse me if this has been answered/posted before but I thought that when SJ said "...and boy have we patented it" meant that we wouldn't see other competition so similiar, ie- the 'multi-touch hand-held device' aspect of it.

?

Steve makes a lot of claims these days.
 
Yuk....Friend of mind tried the latest HTC and he returned it after 1 week. Couldn't use the thing. He got a really good deal from Orange, but just couldn't handle it. All the features were unusable. He was used to an Itouch though and so he knew what the iphone was like. Alas o2 had noreception in his home so ended up sticking to a standard phone.

Still. Windows mobile was the problem and until they change that there is no competition as far as i'm concerned.

Have you ever used Windows Mobile?
 
the hardware and design may be appealing, but the hearts and guts of it is winmo... sorry. It's like putting a ferrari body kit on a ford.

Most people still don't understand why the iphone works so well. It's the tight integration of OS X and the hardware, since apple makes both and has 100% control of both aspects, this is what makes the entire user experience. I doubt you will see that on any other device. From watching the new video of the Touch HD. I'm not impressed at all. If it wasn't for the iPhone, there would be no Touch HD.
 
the hardware and design may be appealing, but the hearts and guts of it is winmo... sorry. It's like putting a ferrari body kit on a ford.

Most people still don't understand why the iphone works so well. It's the tight integration of OS X and the hardware, since apple makes both and has 100% control of both aspects, this is what makes the entire user experience. I doubt you will see that on any other device. From watching the new video of the Touch HD. I'm not impressed at all. If it wasn't for the iPhone, there would be no Touch HD.

Did you even watch the video? Please do, and stop blurting out Apple marketing likes its fact. WinMo is designed to work on multiple hardware, but how does that make the "integration" any less functional, especially in the Touch HD's case?
 
A couple of points-

1st, I watched the video linked to up above- it looks like for custom zooming in the browser you still have to use a scroll bar down at the bottom (which his finger did nicely, but he must have been very used to doing that - a lot of people would get out the stylus for that). In it's defense, it did look like the double touch worked for smart zoom though. But still not as easy to zoom where you want as the pinch.

2nd, all of these other phones that have the card slots- yes, this makes the *storage* memory larger, but from what I understand, the memory on these cards cannot be used to launch apps from. You need internal memory to store the applications. So again, only the VERY very latest phones that have come out or will be released soon have the same internal memory as the iphone, and I can only think of a few that do.
 
Although I would love to use my iPhone the 6 months a year I travel It is locked. This although maybe not quite as slick over all as the iPhone this might be the stop gap measure I was looking for. I need tethering and not the SOCKS proxy work around for they have for the iPhone now.

Seems like the iPod on the iPhone beats this device but I can just use my iPhone for that.

I bought a Nokia before and the software it came with didn't work on a Mac, is HTC software compatible? Also does it charge from USB? I need it do that because where I am going has no electricity except for a generator a couple hours a night. It really sort of sucks when the laptop is full but the phone it is tethered to is out of juice.

Before people start hating on me for wanting one of these, keep in mind I actually want it because I need it. It would be rather hard to use my locked, unable to tether iPhone given my circumstances or I would do just that. Last time I tried my original unlocked iPhone in the area I stay in, it didn't get signal when other phones did anyway.

Even if an unlock becomes available for the 3G it isn't like I can spot test it before going. Not that I can test the HTC either but every make of phone was able to make and receive calls in that location except for my iPhone.

I am going to guess that there will be things I like about the HTC and things I prefer about the iPhone. I am giving up on having my cake and eating it too.
 
It's a great piece of hardware. I'd like my iPhone to have that screen and camera. Still, it's gonna be 200$ more expensive (unsubsidized prices) and of course there's the issue of win-mo. The problem will be for Apple once HTC sells this with Android inside...

Anyways, this is good. It might convince apple to up the ante, hardware wise. If we are lucky it might also make apple rethink about the incomplete bluetooth stack, lack of video recording, etc - crippled functionality is =(
 
2nd, all of these other phones that have the card slots- yes, this makes the *storage* memory larger, but from what I understand, the memory on these cards cannot be used to launch apps from. You need internal memory to store the applications. So again, only the VERY very latest phones that have come out or will be released soon have the same internal memory as the iphone, and I can only think of a few that do.

Actually, Windows Mobile can run apps loaded onto the SD card.


Some apps like SBP Mobile Shell, that deal with reskinning the OS, requires installing on the internal memory because of the way the OS Boots.
 
Did you even watch the video? Please do, and stop blurting out Apple marketing likes its fact. WinMo is designed to work on multiple hardware, but how does that make the "integration" any less functional, especially in the Touch HD's case?

Learn to read a bit more closer. I stated that I watched the video. :rolleyes:
I guess you fall in the category that don't understand seamless user intergration.

Show me one device from windows or microsoft that has the same user experience level as apple's products.
 
A couple of points-

1st, I watched the video linked to up above- it looks like for custom zooming in the browser you still have to use a scroll bar down at the bottom (which his finger did nicely, but he must have been very used to doing that - a lot of people would get out the stylus for that).

The phone is brand new. I doubt he had it for more than a few hours.

In it's defense, it did look like the double touch worked for smart zoom though. But still not as easy to zoom where you want as the pinch.

Pinch zoom is way overrated.

2nd, all of these other phones that have the card slots- yes, this makes the *storage* memory larger, but from what I understand, the memory on these cards cannot be used to launch apps from. You need internal memory to store the applications. So again, only the VERY very latest phones that have come out or will be released soon have the same internal memory as the iPhone, and I can only think of a few that do.

As already pointed out, you are wrong about how applications work on WM.

212rikanmofo said:
the hardware and design may be appealing, but the hearts and guts of it is winmo... sorry. It's like putting a ferrari body kit on a ford.

Most people still don't understand why the iphone works so well. It's the tight integration of OS X and the hardware, since apple makes both and has 100% control of both aspects, this is what makes the entire user experience. I doubt you will see that on any other device. From watching the new video of the Touch HD. I'm not impressed at all.

After the 2.0 fiasco, saying the iPhone works well is a bit of a joke. You know windows mobile doesn't have a screen of death of any kind.

If it wasn't for the iPhone, there would be no Touch HD.

So you cant see the progression from this

xda2.jpg


to this?

htc_touch_hd.jpg
 
Learn to read a bit more closer. I stated that I watched the video. :rolleyes:
I guess you fall in the category that don't understand seamless user intergration.
I do understand seamless user experience, but I also understand that it wasn't invented by Apple. (But that's not something you'd know from Apple's marketing) It's something that does not interfere with the user’s goals and remains in the background. Up until last friday, the iPhone was quite the interference in the user's goals. But wait, what happened to that magical "tight integration of OS X and the hardware" that would be seemingly impervious to such problems?

Show me one device from windows or microsoft that has the same user experience level as apple's products.
This is why I claimed you didn't watch the video. :D I'm going to assume (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong) that you fall into the crowd who hasn't actually used Windows Mobile but somehow feels qualified to judge its usefulness, abilitiy, or user experience. More importantly, Touch HD is 3D accelerated (has a GPU for rendering) and completely layers Windows Mobile in TouchFlo for most functions of the phone, therefore bypassing most of the problems you would experience. Now my question is, what could you possibly complain about that seems lackluster or problematic compared to the iPhone (Besides the Windows Logo)?

If it wasn't for the iPhone, there would be no Touch HD.
Here we go again...! ;)
 
I don't know. I guess I am not seeing how amazing this is like some of you. I can see where it has done a lot of things that competitors haven't been able to accomplish, but it still does nothing for me. UI is terrible, but the functioning seems pretty good.

I am not convinced though.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.