You postulate it’s easy to do, but Jobs picked Cook, not another person. Therefore, ergo, Jobs counters your postulation it’s not easy to do.Which is easy to do. If I gave you 1 billion dollars and asked you to innovate that’s relatively easy to do. Coming up with innovation from zero which is what Jobs did is difficult.
That Jobs picked Cook means That means everyone else is disqualified. I guarantee after cook there will be a difference, and not in the positive.Jobs picked the person he thought would be the best. That doesn’t mean everyone else would be disqualified. Once the Cook era is over, Apple will be handed over to anyone who the Board feels like it and I guarantee you will see absolutely no difference.
No, and neither does Apple.Do car manufacturers intentionally put in defective components in cars?
This is all hypotheticals.The LG display can’t even display colours and I mean this literally. It displays yellow as orange. Literally every one of their displays is infested with problems. Every one of Samsung’s displays is not infested with problems.
[doublepost=1535329999][/doublepost]
Cook was handed a functioning company with room to grow. He executed a brilliant plan to grow the customer base. The plan succeeded and now Cook will go down in the history books.Jobs was handed a bankrupt company which he single handedly turned into the most profitable company on the planet. Tim Cook took what Jobs gave him and iterated on it. Without Job’s vision the iPhone product category does not exist. Just look at the profit share. iPhone makes up a majority of the pie as it did when Jobs was around. No changes.
This was a big chink in the armor of Jobs perfection. He screwed the pooch with this one.The iPhone 4 antennagate was a flaw with Apple’s then flagship product. No company is stupid enough to sabotage its current flagship. Touch Disease and Throttlegate affect only older phones.
More hypotheticals.Apple would have reached 1T even if Jobs was still CEO. The iPhone was already shooting off the charts when Cook took over.
[doublepost=1535330076][/doublepost]
The customers that bought into Apple's ecosystem, disagree with you. Enough bought in to raise revenue and profits and the market has spoken about apple.The first thought that comes to mind is charging customers $10 for a 3.5mm to lightning adapter. Then $19 for a usb-c to lightning/usb-a. Let’s not forget you can’t connect an iPhone to a 2016+ Mac without buying an adapter.
Definitely customer first
[doublepost=1535330823][/doublepost]
That's a reflection on the minimalism of Cook's thinking, not the profit minded motive that is thought of. New directions for Apple and if you are referring to the Macs as the product catalog, I believe he has a plan.It’s a matter of priority and it reflects in the product catalog which is a mess currently.
SJ was product minded first. TC cares about appeasing wall street first and product 2nd.
Example: why can’t an iPhone X connect to a new MacBook Pro without a dongle?
So you have only to point the Mac as proof that Apple is a mess?So, you have no real arguments and can only point to money, gotcha. Cook has no vision, see: Mac lineup.
The price is the price. Want a nav system in a car? You have to buy other options and pay a few thousand dollars. The price is the price. Seems like a trend is in place that we all will see the vision for at some point in time, but people are mistakenly attributing it to a money grab.The first thought that comes to mind is charging customers $10 for a 3.5mm to lightning adapter. Then $19 for a usb-c to lightning/usb-a. Let’s not forget you can’t connect an iPhone to a 2016+ Mac without buying an adapter.
Definitely customer first