Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So, you‘re telling me that my $3500 MacBook Pro from late 2019 is not capable to render a 3D globe?

WTF.
I hope this is the case. I’ve been wanting an M1 Air for a while now and every time I chat in asking about getting one from Apple online they tell me I can’t trade a Mac in at my store. I might just show up at a store with it and see what they do.
You may need to make an appointment for your local store. I do with mine for anything. Check your local store requirements online before leaving the house.
 
If I take my MBP 2019 16" (with AppleCare) to an apple store when the M1 comes out and say give me an M1, will they do it? (in a polite way)

BTW why do people keep bypassing the fact that this model is on sale now and the top model, yet it is not compatible with the new features? That is a significant thing. "oh Apple only owe you that the machine you buy now is compatible with the current features at the time of purchase" well...... if I go and buy this model now, in a few months it won't be able to run everything so that argument is flawed. Even in beta.
 
Everything on this list screams "failure to abstract properly".

The fact of the matter is that Apple shouldn't be programming to the neural engine. They should be programming to a standard API like OpenCL, OpenGL, or TensorFlow, and their implementation of that standard API should implement the functionality in the most efficient way possible on any given device, including using the neural engine, if available.
Several good points, like ☝🏻. Unfortunately the GPGPU computing market is a blatant mess. Nvidia and Apple both kinda sabotaged OpenCL (favouring CUDA/Metal). Then there was AMDs half-hearted ROCm, then I lost oversight.

Not sure what happened exactly, but OpenCL has been abandonened by pretty much all relevant players, so there is no GPGPU computing standard to speak of left. One has to decide between several evils (CUDA being the most sensible for most people)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: smoooosher
Oh it definitely was, but they didn’t specify that so of course I was going to correct them. ;)

The underlying concern of theirs was that they needed the 3 displays, but then why would you choose an entry-level chip? These are the first iteration of the M-series chips. If the M1X still only supports 2 monitors, then we can have a discussion.
The previous MacBook Air supports two 4K external displays.

I agree it’s probably not a huge issue for most buyers but it’s still a regression in hardware support.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeadingHeat
Why should they? You saying so doesn’t make it so. All Apple owes you is that the machine does what they promise it will do at the time you buy it. There’s never an implied promise that it will support every new feature for the indefinite or even near future. And anyone spending $15k on an intel Mac Pro who gives a **** about these silly little features has a screw loose. They obviously bought the machine to do very specific work, not to blur FaceTime backgrounds.
Yea, ok, you're right lmao. Never mind forget it, you're right dude.
 
None of this stuff is anything I want in macOS. Sorry. Besides I have the features on the intel mac I do want. Windows. More ram. More software. Compatible with what already works. If I “upgrade”, some stuff I can’t use.

To be honest I doubt I update macOS anytime soon.
 
If someone is dropping $15k on an Intel Mac Pro, those features should be available on that machine, regardless of whether it's the intel or M_ vatriant.
Then you would have to qualify it for any other Intel system, too. Otherwise, it's the same problem. "Why can this other system run it, but mine can't?"

Should Apple not have added TouchID support to macOS, because not every Intel Mac running Sierra would support it?

There are a hell of a lot more people buying the $1200 products than the $5k+ products. Solve for the 80, 90, 95. It's not negligence.
 
Wow $100 what could I buy with that?😂

I feel like doing a cardinal sin and purging Mac OS from the Mac and putting windows on it only. Problem solved.... /s
 
I don't understand the bitching.

You've survived all this time without said features, so your computer is less useful now?

I own an M1 Mac and I probably won't ever use nor will I care about these features.

You're still getting access to the latest version of MacOS with continued support; Apple is a business and owes us nothing. Heck, I know friends and family who are still using 7-10 year old iMacs, Mac Minis, and MacBook Pros as their daily computer still.
 
Sarcasm?

If there's a finite amount of resources to develop 8 features, Apple could either release 4 of 8 of them for both M1 and x86, or release all those 8 for M1.

Apple is in the business to sell new hardware. Of course you're going to put your best features on your newest silicon architectures, only.
But I've constantly been told that apple has great software updates. Obvious fan boy dream.
 
Yes, but what I am saying is that the latest MacBook Pro 16" on sale now, is not compatible with the latest features just announced. Older iPhones may be on sale, but the latest one will support the new features. I am happy for the line to be drawn, just not after one year.
Right. Your Intel Mac is current release. Monterey is beta. Your Intel Mac, bought new today, supports everything in Big Sur - the current release. And by the time Monterey is actually released, that Intel Mac may have been superseded by an M-variant. Then the combo would be a current-get M-based Mac, and Monterey.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.