Please explain given the original post.Holy mother of false equivalencies
Please explain given the original post.Holy mother of false equivalencies
As an owner of a 24,000 US$ mac pro 2019 bought a bit more than one year ago I am totally and utterly pissed by these cost centric decisions.
We'll be happy to pay your postage also.If you'd like to upgrade to an Apple Silicon model, we'd be happy to recycle your old machine for you!
-Tim
isn't that like the entire list of monterey's new features that aren't going to be available?
LOLYOU’VE FOILED THEIR PLANS YOU BOUNDER, YOU RUFFIAN!!
What's confirmed?I feel some people are being a bit deliberately obtuse in this matter.
The fact that these features are missing, is not a big deal on the face of it, but what it represents (should these features currently not be in development for Intel Macs) is Apple taking away team resources used for development for Intel machines and moving them onto M1 machines, while still selling Intel machines, and leaving lots of Intel owners out in the cold without much thought. The decent thing to do, would have been to operate equal resources on both M1 and Intel machines for the remainder of the Intel model lives. Even three years main feature support would have been suitable.
If you are ok with Apple doing this to you, good for you. But I think it is wrong and shows Apple will happily step on you should it suit them. As many of us always suspected but it is now confirmed. But there is really bugger all we can do about it apart from buy non Apple when we want a new machine.
Remember, these chips started in the iPhone. They’ve been evolving the ARM SoCs since 2010 when they introduced the A4 SoC.Really, you think Apples ARM SoC's have evolved that much?
The new M1 computers include a lot of AI CPU cores in the SOC, which is what allows most of these features. Intel doesn't include any, in current CPU's.This is an outrage. No technical reason this can’t be on Intel.
Forced depreciation in action.
How? The literature on Apples website states the M1 only supports 1 External display.I run two monitors from my M1 MBP13 (total of three screens) and two from my Mac Mini
Two totalHow? The literature on Apples website states the M1 only supports 1 External display.
How? The literature on Apples website states they can only support 1 display.My M1 Mini with dual displays - 27" Thunderbolt + 32" 4K:
View attachment 1790349
Right; but the laptops cannot support 2 external displays. Am I correct in this?Two total
The Mini of course has no internal display, thus it supports two externals
CorrectRight; but the laptops cannot support 2 external displays. Am I correct in this?
Apple could have said that the M1 Macs support “a random sharp punch to the solar plexus” and folks would be screaming about why THEY can’t also get a punch? Why can’t the Intel Macs support that!? without even thinking about it. Get outraged first, THEN consider what you’re outraged about is the keyPowered by siri. That bitch cant dictate a four word sentence accurately. Apple has the worst and most in accurate voice dictation in the market. That is not a feature you’re losing out on. It’s a crew lots of torture for those that have m1s and try it
The spinning globe thing is really ridiculous. Sounds like a bad joke.So my 28 core Mac Pro can’t run a spinning globe?
Correction, can’t run an APPLE built spinning globe. However, I doubt that matters right? I mean, have you spun a globe on that 28 core Mac Pro before today?So my 28 core Mac Pro can’t run a spinning globe?
What hardware would you consider?
16 GB is needed if you’re using an Intel system (in addition to 4 GB of VRAM). It’ll run on all Apple Silicon systems.The issue is people on here were statin the 8GB RAM was plenty and would last people for years to come. Yet not even 2 years after release you need double that for the OS to perform all of it's features.
That was against "M1 is the new baseline and will be for several years going forward."Remember, these chips started in the iPhone. They’ve been evolving the ARM SoCs since 2010 when they introduced the A4 SoC.
That’s an amazing idea since Windows 10 works as intended with all the features in any toaster with any intel, ram or ssd installed, no restrictions at all. I mean even a chromebook with an intel core duo can use google earth showing the globe 🌍.I guess you could replace your ageing iMac with a Windows system and have 0% of the Monterey features. That might work out better, actually.
Budgetary constraints on resources is certainly an acceptable and understandable reason. However for corporations as large and rich as Apple, that argument falls on its face. Of course they can do whatever they want, and we are free to complain about it and not purchase their products either.Sarcasm?
If there's a finite amount of resources to develop 8 features, Apple could either release 4 of 8 of them for both M1 and x86, or release all those 8 for M1.
Apple is in the business to sell new hardware. Of course you're going to put your best features on your newest silicon architectures, only.
Then don’t upgrade…personally, I have zero problems with the updates to Safari in Monterrey, what’s your deal? Because you don’t want them? With all the alternate browsers available for macOS, you can’t find something else to use? Seems like you’re projecting your problems on the rest of us and at least one of us is not agreeing with you.Not totally
All platforms will get the completely unwanted changes to Safari forced down their throats