remember when os updates were all or nothing if your machine was supported?
none of this patchwork features supported
none of this patchwork features supported
An interactive 3D globe doesn't require a neural network to display. Google Earth has had a 3D interactive map for almost fifteen years.
They NEVER have to explain anything - it's their choice. However, just because that is the case doesn't mean that people can't be rightfully angry about it.
Apple is selling devices TODAY that aren't capable of the full set of features in their latest OS release. This isn't a "we finished our transition to Apple Silicon - these new features will only be available for Apple Silicon Macs." This is them continuing to sell Macs starting at $1800 USD that will immediately become obsolete as it relates to running the full software stack.
That's not to say that some of this stuff does seem to require Apple Silicon support - like live text, etc. But that doesn't mean consumers can't be angry about this.
Usually it is the other way around. The betas I have noticed are more inclusive and then the cuts happen.This OS release is beta and there is no reason not to believe by the time it actually ships that all the current Macs (save one) will be refreshed to Apple Silicon. As long as your Intel Mac did everything it was promised to do on the day you bought it, I don't see a real issue.
Very surprised Universal Control wasn’t on that list…
Sounds environment friendly, as Apple loves to advert.Rather sooner than later id argue. It’s like Apple hates Intel Mac so much they’d throw all of them, brand new, straight to landfill if possible.![]()
So much for the ongoing support for Intel based machines that Apple promised. All of those items in the exclusion list are possible on an Intel CPU..
Technically it's still fully supported today as Monterey is not out yet and won't be for 3-4 months. Come September/October when Monterey finally launches, who knows if the Intel 16" MBP will still be sold as new from Apple.So if you buy your new 16MBP now, it is basically already partly unsupported. Nice.
Intel Mac fans, this is just a nudge. 😄
You mean "deprecation" - but it is kind of sad they're doing this already.This is an outrage. No technical reason this can’t be on Intel.
Forced depreciation in action.
And then you will have to get a M3 MBP because certain features of macOS 17 don't work on your M2 MBP.It feels like Intel Macs are going to be killed off quickly.
What are the other thousands of developers doing at Apple? They are certainly not fixing all the bugs.Sarcasm?
If there's a finite amount of resources to develop 8 features, Apple could either release 4 of 8 of them for both M1 and x86, or release all those 8 for M1.
Apple is in the business to sell new hardware. Of course you're going to put your best features on your newest silicon architectures, only.
The M1's Neural Engine is one of the big features that sets it apart from Intel's processors. As more apps and features begin to rely on this, there will be less incentive to get an Intel Mac.I guess the 1st FaceTime blurring thing is done with the M1's neural engine, so that is that.
Tim has decided you don't need 2 monitors.Give me an M Processor that supports 2 monitors.
True, but I don't think they will release new computers that won't support these features. Everything in the catalog is due an Apple Silicon refresh in the next few months. I imagine everything except the Mac Pro will be replaced with Apple Silicon versions or no longer produced. By the time MacOS 12 ships all the currently sold computers will support all of its features. I also believe if an Intel Mac Pro is kept in the catalog it will be updated to support them as as well.Usually it is the other way around. The betas I have noticed are more inclusive and then the cuts happen.
egpu support comes to mind. Betas had it working on TB1/2 Macs only to be TB3 when released