Siri: I'm sorry, I didn't get that.
Viv: movie
Siri: sorry, I am unable to move
Viv: never mind
Siri: the nearest mine is 5038 kilometers from your current location.
Brilliant!
Siri: I'm sorry, I didn't get that.
Viv: movie
Siri: sorry, I am unable to move
Viv: never mind
Siri: the nearest mine is 5038 kilometers from your current location.
Thanks for the kind link to the site which talks about dictation. I'm not to sure why you posted it here as my post already stated I do this a lot.
If they want a company to work with they should stay away from Apple. Too many internal politics and it will get shoved in the conner somewhere and never see the light of day.
Hey guys... We got Apple to buy us once. Now that Apple isn't spending any money on Siri, let's split off and invent another AI, make it a bit smarter, and then sell it back to Apple again and make a crapton more money!
Marvel's Iron Man 3 - JARVIS: A Second Screen Experience by Marvel EntertainmentI want a JARVIS.
The issue is not around the intelligent assistant having access to the data, it's about the company having access to the data. If the AI can access data that's only stored on the device, that's not a problem. Or, if all of your personal data is stored in an encrypted format in the cloud and then unencrypted locally, that's not a problem either. If the rumors of Apple encrypting all iCloud data is true, perhaps we will see Siri being able to collate more of your data.
But let's be real – Siri and Proactive already have access to a ton of your daily information that's stored locally, and yet they both totally fail at taking advantage of it.
You spelled Microsoft wrong.
If Apple can't innovate on their own with truckloads of R&D money and armies of people then they should pay or stay away and let it flourish like Dropbox. Hey Viv, do you think Eddy must go?
So sad, yet so true.
[doublepost=1462404293][/doublepost]
These guys will stay away from Apple like the plague. They left Apple soon after the acquisition of Siri. You wonder why Siri has stayed so underwhelming? Because these guys left to work on furthering their ideas in an innovative setting. Sure as hell is not Cupertino.![]()
10 years ago, when I worked in Bellevue, WA, a Microsoft engineer friend demonstrated voice recognition software he was working on, on his phone (he helped develop it for cars), and it understood him clearly in a noisy room full of people. The iPhone may be able to do that today, but I get frustrated by it recognizing what I said, and still asking me to clarify; or, not getting contact results that are definitely on the phone; or, its crappy robotic voice... Google's voice (I mostly hear it in Google Maps) has always been more pleasant and natural, and sounds like it got a recent upgrade in quality.Just remember people, Apple bought Siri because they couldn't do it themselves. Microsoft built Cortana from the ground up in house. Hence she's a way better AI.
Siri is slow and can't comprehend half of what she's told.
AI: six decades of parlour tricks. The human mind and conciousness cannot be replicated with digital systems, it's a fool's errand. All we can hope for are fast and reliable stores of canned algorithms (e.g. Siri, Cortana, etc.) that can mimic simple tasks to save a bit of time here and there.AI started off as alofty, self aware, Turin test passing entity. It was quickly changed into a marketing term for apps and games for 2 reasons:
1 it was catchy and boosted sales
2 they could not come up with a better name for a set of complex algorithms, so they called it AI.
I'm unsure what your post means, lol... Was there a right answer I was supposed to aim for? lolENH! Wrong answer. I just asked her that same question and Siri replied "What, again?". That's pretty funny.
Seems it is becoming fashionable to hate apple nowadays, well really just in the past few weeks. It is also becoming fashionable to use the word meme as much as possible, a word I have not even really seen at all until about a month ago and now appears every 3rd or 4th article across the web.
Hey guys... We got Apple to buy us once. Now that Apple isn't spending any money on Siri, let's split off and invent another AI, make it a bit smarter, and then sell it back to Apple again and make a crapton more money!
AI: six decades of parlour tricks. The human mind and conciousness cannot be replicated with digital systems, it's a fool's errand. All we can hope for are fast and reliable stores of canned algorithms (e.g. Siri, Cortana, etc.) that can mimic simple tasks to save a bit of time here and there.
10 years ago, when I worked in Bellevue, WA, a Microsoft engineer friend demonstrated voice recognition software he was working on, on his phone (he helped develop it for cars), and it understood him clearly in a noisy room full of people. The iPhone may be able to do that today, but I get frustrated by it recognizing what I said, and still asking me to clarify; or, not getting contact results that are definitely on the phone; or, its crappy robotic voice... Google's voice (I mostly hear it in Google Maps) has always been more pleasant and natural, and sounds like it got a recent upgrade in quality.
The thing is, for many of us Siri works just fine. I have a friend who whines and complains about Siri on his phone, we’ve gone through the voice training for his but still, he will say something to his phone and it will balk, I can yell it from across the table and his Siri does what I tell it to do.The creators of Viv... who else?
They shouldn't have bought Siri if they knew they could not use it. That was a waste of money.