They can easily add 0.3" just by shrinking the wasted space above and below the screen and making it a little wider like the 3G/3GS, but I'd hope they actually eliminate the wasted space because it doesn't look like it in the photo.
Actually, this is exactly what I personally bet that they do [next year]. It's what would make the most sense to appease customers who we must conclude love the phoblets pioneered by Android device manufacturers.2) They DECREASE the density of the screen to keep the same number of pixels over the larger area. This would result in a less than Retina quality screen. Not happening.
Remember this picture? The left display looks bigger than the right.
2) They DECREASE the density of the screen to keep the same number of pixels over the larger area. This would result in a less than Retina quality screen. Not happening.
Jobs imagined a world where people could afford both phones and tablets. A world where he could sell both a phone and a tablet to every person. And in this world, everyone had the optimum device for the task, and thus were the most happy.Buh buh buh but Jobs said no one wanted screens bigger than the original iPhone's screen! LOL
Hahahahaha gotta love this site, 'it is highly unlikely to be true'. Yeah because a finger print scanner is sooooo much more true, or anything else they say on this site, is so much more true or fact. Just like the vaporware Apple TV set which no doubt generates a fair few hits.
No way they are increasing the screen size but if they hit 4.5" to 5" I would likely switch back from Android. I had an iPhone 5 but got rid of it for a note 2. Somewhere in between would have been better.
Think about it.
If they increase the size of the screen (in width as the iPhone 5 already had a height increase) then there's two options:
1) They will increase the number of pixels displayed to something like 1136 x 700. This would make almost ALL apps incompatible. Way to piss off the devs that are already having to update for iOS 7.
2) They DECREASE the density of the screen to keep the same number of pixels over the larger area. This would result in a less than Retina quality screen. Not happening.
Calling BS on this too.
Exactly, Apple is too lazy to create a new design in one year, it takes them two...
Agreed... Apple has kind of painted themselves into a corner with all of the Retina marketing. Now every other smartphone offers bigger displays, but Apple can't easily match the competition without running into one of these two problems. Damned if you do and damned if you don't.
I may be in the minority, but I am so tired of reading iPhone rumor articles every day. Don't misunderstand, I like my iPhone and iPad, but I miss the days when MacRumors posted on Mac's. Currently, iPhone's, iPad's, and iOS are the main "rumors" focus (a new camera cable? that's amazing!). It's trifling.
/end rant. Carry on![]()
Tell me you're not falling for what is easily manipulated in Photoshop or just changing the location and angle of the other phone.
Not true. The iPhone 5 wasn't just a "new look." It also has updated internals over the 4S. Whereas the 4 was, like you said, only a new look; it retained the same internals as the 3GS.The only exception to this rule is the original iPhone & the iPhone 3G.
Tim Cook is another John Sculley.