Wheels extraFor the convenient price of $387,000.
Wheels extraFor the convenient price of $387,000.
Yes, but the lightning cable is extra.Will it come with a charger?
I have a strong feeling that its going to be a special Apple BMW, considering it always has been BMW that was always first to try out new Apple features.Apple will not be producing a car. If that is even on their roadmap, it is a decade or more out. What they WILL do will be similar to what Google just did with the Polestar 2 but on a grander scale - that is, the vehicle's integrated electronics (it's "brain") will be an Apple-designed system. Basically, CarPlay but for every function of the car. Many of these features already exist in SOME cars or through third-party products/services, but Apple would be integrating them into a central system and it could be offered on lots of cars.
- While driving: "Hey Siri, turn up the rear A/C"
- Siri prompts that your intended (or predicted) destination might be further than your current tank will allow, maybe even suggesting where to stop for gas.
- From inside your house: "Hey Siri, warm up my car"
- Shortcut that warms up car automatically 5 minutes before departure time for an event
- Garage door automatically opens when car is in garage and starts, and closes when it leaves (car-dependent, rather than person-dependent)
- Using Apple's HIGHLY advanced software and processing core competency to utilize the sensors already in many/most modern cars and license out their integration to OEMs. i.e. Subaru and others currently use forward-facing cameras to operate many of their safety features, and Apple Maps and CarPlay could integrate this into the navigation (as some already do) alongside advanced prompts and visual cues.
Again, basically, car manufacturers have never been great at technology interfaces. They are getting better as it becomes more important to consumers, but they're still not on the level of actual tech companies. This is why they are willing to pay license money to have Android Auto and CarPlay available, because people want them more than what the OEM came up with. This is a solid precedent for them willing to pay royalties to have Apple's integrated system.
For an early version of this type of integration, I totally believe that the end of next year is feasible.
Apple at one point was rumored to build a car on the BMW i3 platform, which I was an early adopter of and personally loved. That car was like a piece of art to me, it’s under-appreciated and pictures/videos online don’t do a well-specced version justice. Although it has its drawbacks and would require a major revamp for a company like Apple to build a modern EV off of it, there are a lot of genuine innovations such as the carbon fiber reinforced chassis that make it unique to every other vehicle on the road. I would be curious to see this concept live on under Apple’s technology and design.I have a strong feeling that its going to be a special Apple BMW, considering it always has been BMW that was always first to try out new Apple features.
iPod Integration, Apple CarPlay, Wallet CarKey, etc.
That worked so well with the Motorola ROKR.Perhaps they're just going to rebadge a car from another automaker and add their own accoutrements? Automakers do this pretty often.
The doors will cost $10000 extra, but will be carved from a single ingot of alumin-eee-um.And after 1000 charge/refill cycles, you'll have to trade it.
The wheels are like the Mac Pro wheels and the Apple Display stand.
About 80% of the time Apple gets things right, the other 20%, not so much.
I can only imagine the price! 🤯If Apple made a car I can only imagine form over function, no steering wheel buttons or any buttons in general ect.
Stange how? Like the Auto-pilot keeps trying to drive your Tesla to Texas? 🤣Would be nice if this rumor is true. My 2013 Tesla S is beginning to act a little strange.
Considering that BMW is now charging an annual fee for CarPlay, which is something that must make Apple unhappy, I doubt it.I have a strong feeling that its going to be a special Apple BMW, considering it always has been BMW that was always first to try out new Apple features.
iPod Integration, Apple CarPlay, Wallet CarKey, etc.
I call utter B.S. on this rumor.
The California Department of Motor Vehicles requires autonomous vehicle developers to provide regular reports on test fleet operations.
Apple's autonomous vehicle team simply doesn't have much in the way of mileage.
The champion is Alphabet's Waymo operation. Some of their test vehicles have prominently displayed commercial licenses just like shuttle buses, schoolbuses, and limousines have.
If Apple were really in a late-stage development cycle of autonomous driving, CA DMV would have reports showing millions of miles of actual test driving from Apple's autonomous driving division. There would also be a bunch of vehicles with TCP bumper ID numbers even if Apple was trying to be clandestine about their identity.
There are probably 30-40 autonomous driving vehicle operations running locally. Some are easily identified (Waymo, the acquired driveAI), others are running in stealth mode while on the streets. But not to the DMV.
No one can just throw their autonomous driving prototype on public roads. They need provisional approval from the DMV and must provide regular reports.
Apple cannot fly under the radar with their testing. Maybe they can masquerade as a stealth startup in the early stages but in the late stages, it would likely be obvious that Big Money was behind an operation with millions of miles and a formidably successful/safe track record.
They‘ve since changed their policy to include CarPlay for the life of the car, free on vehicles that support it.Considering that BMW is now charging an annual fee for CarPlay, which is something that must make Apple unhappy, I doubt it.
You mean Apple, one of the most secretive companies in the world, which developed and manufactured the most successful consumer product of all time without any pre-launch leaks. That Apple?!If Apple were producing a car, we'd know far more about it than we do.
Again, if Apple had a car production facility, we'd know.
Did they? I stand corrected.They‘ve since changed their policy to include CarPlay for the life of the car, free on vehicles that support it.
Apple doesn't have to own a car factory or phone factory or a factory.If Apple were producing a car, we'd know far more about it than we do. The requirements to even start building prototype motor vehicles in the United States are both high, and applications and progress is public.
If Apple (or indeed any shell company) had registered as such, we'd know.
Not to mention there's a finite number of manufacturing lines and facilities able to produce or assemble a car, Tesla would be the only equivalent successful example, and they're as outside the box for car components etc. as Apple might be. There's a reason Tesla bought the Fremont factory.
Again, if Apple had a car production facility, we'd know.