Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Doesn't Sony hold a patent for on the fly switching between integrated and dedicated graphics cards? I know that their Z series uses it.

I'm not 100% sure on whether or not they own the patent (it'd be smart though), but they were the first and still currently the only (to my knowledge) that has on the fly switching without a need to reboot the machine. So, there could be some truth to that.

But, Apple and Sony share quite a lot of tech between each other so it wouldn't surprise if Apple eventually licenses it out.
 
99% of Quicktime users don't need anything more than those output options in QTX so I don't see the problem. If you really need the pro features then you probably already have QT7 Pro and that will be no need to re-buy Pro for Snow Leopard if you already have the key.
Well I guess i'm part of that 1%. QT 7 had more than just a couple of export functions. The video editing in QT 7 looks to be a lot more advanced than the simple scrubbing seen in QT X, you could add masks to videos to crop black bars, deinterlace on the fly and a lot of other things. Like someone above said, it's gonna be the same thing that happened with iMovie 08. Only this time, Apple has decided to give people the old version right at the start because they know that the new one is crippled in features. Hopefully they pull an iMovie 09 and actually give people back features that should have never gone away. I was really looking to a new QuickTime interface since 7 is ugly as all hell, but it looks like i'll still be waiting for that seeing as how Quicktime X is useless as far as i'm concerned.
 
Main reason I'm getting SL right away - I need as much space and speed as Apple can give me on a MacBook for university. The Finder better be blow-my-mind awesome. Goodness knows I'll be spending half of my time navigating the dozens of little assignments that'll build up.

Can't wait for the new desktops and easier stacks, too!
 
My G5 was a little perturbed when I told it 'no, "Text Editing Features and Integration" is not for you, sorry, that needs spiffy intel CPUs!'

My MacBook pointed and laughed. But I told it to stop being so snooty, and pointed out that the G5 still had about three time as much RAM and about four times as much internal storage.

Also, the box art really is horrific, the worst since the one with the orange and black cat print on it IMHO. Snow White and the Seven Dwarves would have been better, but I guess that would imply Windows 7 usage a little too much, plus the humble apple is kind of abused and doesn't come off too well in that story either. We all know the Magic Mirror was a glossy screen hooked up to Google though.
 

I'm a little disappointed that the current version of aMSN isn't working with it, as that's what I use to video chat with my partner when they're away (which is a lot, and for some reason I've never been into the Skype thing :( :p), but I might give the next beta version a shot then.

I also hope that there's an update to Vuze relatively soon, but it's not like not using it is going to kill me :p

For me, the ones I'm most 'upset' with is Growl's memory leaks, as I use that a lot with Adium and Last.FM, as well as the total incompatibility with OnyX altogether - albeit not unexpected as it IS a new OS, and no doubt there'll be an update soon.

Anyway, as of several hours ago I've had SL on preorder, can't wait to give it a try even if I can't use some of my favourite apps :D

Oh, and yeah, on topic :eek: it's looking more like a new OS and not just a simple 'upgrade' of Leopard to me since I read that Apple page, they really have packed a lot of stuff into it even if it's not immediately noticeable. I remember seeing a graph a couple weeks ago outlining how much they've cut down the sizes of some apps, and I'm absolutely amazed with how they've been able to achieve that. Progress is not necessarily adding 'awesome new features' - progress is optimisation and fine tuning, and hopefully that's the key to Snow Leopard's success.
 
Six pages and NO ONE has mentioned the fact that icon previews are a complete no-show?

This feature received a lot of attention from Apple during that big SL presentation they gave a little while ago. It was probably in my top 5 things to look forward to in SL. I'm already running the GM, and it's nowhere to be found. :-(

What I'm talking about: http://mac101.net/content/reviews/snow-leopard-preview-finder-icon-previews/
 
Yes, you are correct and this is NOT a new Snow Leopard feature. My late 2008 MacBook already does GPU assisted decode of H264 video. You can confirm this quite easily by playing a 1080p video on any unibody MacBook and note that it doesn't even require 25% of one CPU core to do the decoding. Meanwhile, my 2.66GHz Intel Mac Pro requires almost 100% of a CPU core to decode the same video. Thus, Apple's claim that this is a new Snow Leopard feature is quite dubious. Basically, all they are doing is officially acknowledging something that they had already implemented last year (under Leopard).
Tiger starting with 10.4.8 already had a multi-threaded OpenGL pipeline for Intel Macs yet it was claimed as a new feature in Leopard albeit expanded to PowerPC Macs. I guess we'll have to hope that Apple expands H.264 acceleration support to more GPUs to justify the "new" claim. Really, all Intel Macs with discrete GPUs support some form of H.264 acceleration with the ATI X1000 series and nVidia 7000 series having partial accceleration and full acceleration coming in the ATI HD2000 and nVidia 8000 series. It doesn't make sense that the 9400M gets H.264 acceleration while high-end GPUs like the HD4870 don't or older Intel Macs that really need it with say the X1600 don't, whereas it is supported in Windows.

In terms of OpenCL support, does QuickTime X and iTunes use it? Seeing their popularity and cross-platform nature, using OpenCL in QuickTime and iTunes seems like the best way to popularize it ahead of CUDA or DX11 Compute Shaders.
 
Six pages and NO ONE has mentioned the fact that icon previews are a complete no-show?

This feature received a lot of attention from Apple during that big SL presentation they gave a little while ago. It was probably in my top 5 things to look forward to in SL. I'm already running the GM, and it's nowhere to be found. :-(

What I'm talking about: http://mac101.net/content/reviews/snow-leopard-preview-finder-icon-previews/
I wasn't impressed by that feature in the slightest. I don't see it being very useful at all with QuickLook being far superior as you can actually see the file in full size without it being a tiny icon in the finder.
 
I wasn't impressed by that feature in the slightest. I don't see it being very useful at all with QuickLook being far superior as you can actually see the file in full size without it being a tiny icon in the finder.

Ah, but it's useful for things like previewing a bunch of songs before adding them to iTunes, for instance. :)

Sky Blue: Seriously? I'm on 432, and I see nothing.
 
I wasn't impressed by that feature in the slightest. I don't see it being very useful at all with QuickLook being far superior as you can actually see the file in full size without it being a tiny icon in the finder.

Quicklook is sheer genius. An instant-on preview. No other OS has this. It's a killer feature. I've become quite dependent on it. And any enhancements to Quicklook (not sure whether there are any in SL) just sweeten the deal.
 
Ah, but it's useful for things like previewing a bunch of songs before adding them to iTunes, for instance. :)

Sky Blue: Seriously? I'm on 432, and I see nothing.

Errr... select item, hit space bar, use the cursor keys to flip through every item. That's how you preview songs. Quicklook also displays the main meta tags and album art.
 
I was really looking to a new QuickTime interface since 7 is ugly as all hell, but it looks like i'll still be waiting for that seeing as how Quicktime X is useless as far as i'm concerned.

Yeah. I wouldn't call QuickTime Pro dead, yet. Apple needs to come out and explain the roadmap for QuickTime. There are a lot of unanswered questions (Are they porting X to Windows and Leopard? Will iTunes require QuickTime X in future versions or will it unbundle itself from QuickTime? Etc). As of now you can't even export to WMV since X doesn't support Flip4Mac's WMV export plug-in or third-party export plug-ins in general (since there's no export option).

QuickTime Pro is fairly popular in media production as an export tool. There's always Final Cut Express or Studio (for Compressor), but that's a huge leap in pricing ($30 to $199 to $499). And Final Cut Express is another bastard child of the Pro Apps division anyway.

QuickTime 7 in Snow Leopard is a stop gap, just like iMovie '06 was when iMovie '08 was released. There's no way they'll want to maintain two separate QuickTime versions going forward.

I find it hard to believe they'll abandon QuickTime Pro completely. They've spent too much time convincing content producers to support its more advanced features (multiple tracks, masking, interactive links, etc). Maybe it's just a matter of resources at the moment and Pro will reappear in the future.
 
This is a "Feature-rich" release ... for some

That is my point exactly. From the perspective of the typical user this release is a non event. Most users aren't going to notice that it takes 3 seconds to fetch email instead of 5.

Apple should have developed these enhancements, released them with little or no fanfare, and done a real release with real new features at a later date.

For those who like to point out it is just a minor "under the hood" type release, I'm sure there are some out there (in addition to me) that are really looking to get the benefit of Exchange integration. Anyone who works in a corporate environment with an Exchange backend will really see this release as a MASSIVE feature update. I accept I'm probably in a minority of users that will benefit from this but if that was the only update 10.6 delivered, I'd still be prepared to pay $200 for it.
 
I agree completely! It's like Apple is trying to push people away.

Check out this Snow Leopard 'feature' listed on the new features page:



You have to be kidding. This took some engineer all of 5 minutes to add, and is something that should have been there since the beginning.

And that is one I really don't get. The date has been beside the time on my menu bar for over a year. It isn't a new feature; they just enabled it by default.
 
Ah, but it's useful for things like previewing a bunch of songs before adding them to iTunes, for instance. :)

Sky Blue: Seriously? I'm on 432, and I see nothing.

I remember people complaining it was difficult to click on a file without getting it to "Preview". Maybe that's why Apple decided not to include it - how annoying would it be that when you go to open a file that you can't click the middle of it?

As stated, Quick Look is the best feature in a while. I love how I don't need to open CS3, MS Office, or any other resource hogging app and still view a file. The Icon Preview is a good idea in thought, but Quick Look is the best way to go.
 
More efficient file sharing??

There is a feature mentioned on the apple site of snow leopard described as
More efficient file sharing - the text explains
"With Snow Leopard and a compatible AirPort Extreme or Time Capsule base station, a computer that acts as a file or media server can go to sleep yet continue to share its files with other computers and devices, saving energy."

Does anyone have any info on how exactly this works? Does the Airport Extreme / Time Capsule unit cache lists , take over the IP and wake the server as required to retrieve full files? Sounds interesting..
 
Video decoding performance

Always thought that OSX's decoding performance was terrible... and for no reason really. Even if H.264 acceleration is only for the 9400M, why can't we have MPEG2 accelleration? Every ATI and Nvidia card around these days has hardware acceleration for MPEG1&2. I know it's not that big a deal anymore, so Apple development doesn't probably care... but it would be nice to see my Apple DVD player only take 10% CPU like it should when playing movies.

Hey and how come OpenCL isn't making more waves here?
 
Always thought that OSX's decoding performance was terrible... and for no reason really. Even if H.264 acceleration is only for the 9400M, why can't we have MPEG2 accelleration? Every ATI and Nvidia card around these days has hardware acceleration for MPEG1&2. I know it's not that big a deal anymore, so Apple development doesn't probably care... but it would be nice to see my Apple DVD player only take 10% CPU like it should when playing movies.

Hey and how come OpenCL isn't making more waves here?
The 9400M G models already have h.264 acceleration for Quicktime under Leopard too.
 
Always thought that OSX's decoding performance was terrible... and for no reason really. Even if H.264 acceleration is only for the 9400M, why can't we have MPEG2 accelleration? Every ATI and Nvidia card around these days has hardware acceleration for MPEG1&2. I know it's not that big a deal anymore, so Apple development doesn't probably care... but it would be nice to see my Apple DVD player only take 10% CPU like it should when playing movies.
I think OS 9 actually had hardware MPEG2 but it was discontinued with OS X. It would be great to get WMV/Divx acceleration too. I can understand Apple not wanting to write the plug-ins and drivers themselves, but while they are putting in the hooks to make the GPU accessible to H.264 acceleration, they could make it a public framework so that third-parties can also access the video acceleration hardware of GPUs for plug-ins like Flip4Mac.
 
I think OS 9 actually had hardware MPEG2 but it was discontinued with OS X. It would be great to get WMV/Divx acceleration too. I can understand Apple not wanting to write the plug-ins and drivers themselves, but while they are putting in the hooks to make the GPU accessible to H.264 acceleration, they could make it a public framework so that third-parties can also access the video acceleration hardware of GPUs for plug-ins like Flip4Mac.
I really hope it's open to the developers to add hardware video decoding acceleration. It's stupid that Apple has been pushing h.264 and HD over the years only to murder your CPU to decode.
 
WHat the Apple chat told me:

Using the Apple sales chat as a reference is not convincing.

You specifically need a Multi-Touch trackpad. While yes, two finger scrolling is a form of touching with multiple fingers, it's not what Apple advertises as "Multi-Tocuch". This requires a physical controller, and not just software.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.