Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I hope that was sarcasm since there is no new UI, I really hate the Finder and Apple still haven't fixed/updated it with 15 year old features in other OS such as cut/paste.

Cover flow view in Finder is pathetic. They need to overhaul it big time.

Uhm, Finder HAS had complete overhaul in SL some 'under the hood' that affect it's performance and several that affect how you use it.

http://www.apple.com/macosx/refinements/enhancements-refinements.html#finder

Six pages and NO ONE has mentioned the fact that icon previews are a complete no-show?

This feature received a lot of attention from Apple during that big SL presentation they gave a little while ago. It was probably in my top 5 things to look forward to in SL. I'm already running the GM, and it's nowhere to be found. :-(

What I'm talking about: http://mac101.net/content/reviews/snow-leopard-preview-finder-icon-previews/

yet it's listed in the Enhancements and Refinements that Apple just posted on their site today http://www.apple.com/macosx/refinements/enhancements-refinements.html#finder
 
i think it's hilarious that people are actually throwing a fit because of a graphics card requirement and saying they're not upgrading. so you're going to give up the decreased memory usage, the decreased hard drive usage, the increased speed in the finder, safari, mail, ical, etc... all because your current computer doesn't meet specs for one particular feature. funny.

as far as i'm concerned this is the most important os x release since 10.2 and is going to pave the way for some truly amazing products/os updates for the next five to ten years.

i only wish other companies (adobe) would take time off from adding mostly useless new features to address performance, stability and general fit and finish of their apps. i'd gladly pay a fully price upgrade to cs5 if the apps were identical in features to cs4, but utilized all the benefits of os x and as apps felt more like pixelmator
 
Uhm, Finder HAS had complete overhaul in SL some 'under the hood' that affect it's performance and several that affect how you use it.

http://www.apple.com/macosx/refinements/enhancements-refinements.html#finder
No mention of getting Finder to work when browsing networks and traversing shares. Even with the full path and IP address it still tosses up error messages under Leopard like it did in Tiger.

It's even more annoying when you have identical machines. It will work on one Mac only to not work on the sibling.
 
No mention of getting Finder to work when browsing networks and traversing shares. Even with the full path and IP address it still tosses up error messages under Leopard like it did in Tiger.

I'm not sure if it's 10.6 or Windows 7, but both my Mac and PC can see and share from each other now. Before it was iffy at best (generally the Mac could always see and connect to my Vista machine, but the Windows machine couldn't see the Mac and/or couldn't authenticate the user name or password.)
 
I'm not sure if it's 10.6 or Windows 7, but both my Mac and PC can see and share from each other now. Before it was iffy at best (generally the Mac could always see and connect to my Vista machine, but the Windows machine couldn't see the Mac and/or couldn't authenticate the user name or password.)
For me it's the Macs that can't see the SMB shares. Some Macs can too and others won't. :confused:

Vista and Windows 7 don't have any problems.
 
i only wish other companies (adobe) would take time off from adding mostly useless new features to address performance, stability and general fit and finish of their apps. i'd gladly pay a fully price upgrade to cs5 if the apps were identical in features to cs4, but utilized all the benefits of os x and as apps felt more like pixelmator

Will never happen with Adobe since they have to build Creative Suite for both Mac and Windows.

It's a shame really. I can't even imagine Photoshop using all the developer features of OS X including the Core frameworks (Image, Audio, Video, Animation, etc) and services (built-in spell check, dictionary, thesaurus, etc). Of all the software developers they would benefit the most.
 
Sadly I do not just an ATI 4870 which should be capable but is apparently not as supported as I had hoped.

OpenCL

requires one of the following graphics cards or graphics processors:

* NVIDIA GeForce 9400M, GeForce 9600M GT, GeForce 8600M GT, GeForce GT 120, GeForce GT 130, GeForce GTX 285, GeForce 8800 GT, GeForce 8800 GS, Quadro FX 4800, Quadro FX5600
* ATI Radeon 4850, Radeon 4870

Finder:

Eject has improved dialogs tell you which applications are using the drive

GCD:

Only apps that are coded to support GCD threading will gain a performance boost. (shame...Vistax64 is able to load balance apps without multi-threading code built in)
 
I hate people stating things they don't really now. Some say older MacBooks don't support 3 and 4 finger gestures because they don't have the "iPhone's multitouch chip" or because they have older hardware. There is proof that old MacBook can recognize gestures with more than 2 fingers, linux.

Not only that but read carefully to what Apple wrote on the upcoming features of Snow Leopard:

Multi-Touch gestures in older Mac models.

All Mac notebooks with Multi-Touch trackpads now support three- and four-finger gestures.

Source: http://www.apple.com/macosx/refinements/enhancements-refinements.html#systempref

It is not saying "older MacBook Air and MacBook Pro models" or "All MacBook Air and MacBook Pro models". It is refering to ALL Mac notebooks. Apple is very careful in what they state.

And don't give me that crap that only because they said "Multi-Touch trackpads" they don't mean older MacBooks. The idiot who said that a mouse is multi-touch is retarded. You don't touch buttons, you PRESS them for them to click. With 2-finger gestures (scrolling) you have to TOUCH using MULTIPLE fingers, meaning more than one.
 
although i love to use SL, i don't think im gonna upgrade.. leopard works fine in my late 2007 mb with intel GMA950........ could i even benefit from SL? (GMA950, 2GB ram)
 
Relax

Try not to invent too many imaginary problems before you have Snow Leopard on your Mac. Then just do stuff and see what happens. Be amazed.
 
My thoughts exactly. 9400M is found in most Macs today, yes, but I'm sure they are a minority when you look at the base of all Intel Macs, since they've been available for a relatively short time.

This isn't even a new feature. Leopard-equipped Unibody notebooks already utilize GPU for H.264 decoding.

9400M isn't the only one. There's a list of support models that you forgot to read.

From here:


Kinda strange....
Or is it that a Mac Pro has enough horsepower over anyway, and that Apple felt the need to use the 9400M's power to help the MacBooks and Mac mini's playback 1080p content.... i.e. iTunes Store going 1080p shortly? ;)

9400M is an example. There are many more supported models. Notebooks have less computing power, so it's easier to make a point when advertising performance boosts.

Am I the only one looking forward to a new GUI!? :D

Nope. Marble was a just a rumor. Not even some sort of leak or whatever.

Hmm... I thought two finger scrolling was a multi-touch gesture? My original MacBook (purchased May '06) supports two finger scrolling, what's so different about the touchpad than in later models?

Multi touch means more than 2 in this case. The later trackpads are glass and have a different controller chip that detects more fingers.

Will the 9600m's in the MBP's get the same improvements as the 9400m or do they already have it? I rarely run the 9400m so the improvements, while nice, won't be much help.

It says computers with that GPU, doesn't say you need to be using it.

Yes you will then get the other gestures

No you won't. No white MacBook is capable of multi touch gestures, Windows, Mac, Linux or otherwise.

Unfortunately apple decided not to enable multi-touch on older macbooks, even though they can.

No they can't. The hardware doesn't support more than 2 fingers. It's hardware limited not software. Linux doesn't give you more than 2 fingers either. Linux gives the old MacBook Pros more than 2 fingers, not plastic MacBook.

Does anyone know exactly which Macbooks will now support multi-touch gestures?

The unibody ones.

Will the white MacBooks be getting multi-touch?

No.

Multi-touch works fine on older macbooks under linux, apple just need to release the driver for it to work on osx.

Wrong. That is only true for older MacBook Pros, not MacBooks. 2 finger gestures works for any MacBook or MacBook Pro. But not multi touch.

Cyberduck isn't supported in SL. Unacceptable! I'm switching to Windows 7.

SL is using a newer version of Java, so blame Sun not Apple.

NOOB question, sorry: Will the 9600m GT do this GPU accelerated video decoding as well, or is it only the 9400m?

IDK.

This is true. The linux driver allows full multitouch gestures like pinch. The guy who worked on this is now working on the full OSX version. Don't let people tell you its all down to a chip....cause its really not.

The Linux driver you are talking about is for MacBook Pros! NOT MacBook (white, black, plastic). MacBook (plastic) NEVER supported more than 2 fingers hardware-wise, Linux, Window, Mac or otherwise.

Having just read this about QuickTime X needing the 9400M for the new features, I won't be upgrading. I was all set on Snow Leopard but damn, that is one lame ass decision made by Apple. My 8600M GT is perfectly capable of doing the same thing.

Remember when Apple was content on supporting it's hardware for years? Pssshhh...my ONE year old MBP isn't even enough now.

Apple never said "8600M doesn't work". They said the 9400M as an example, because it's newer and the 8600M had lots of bad press (failure rates) and is old hardware. Advertising new hardware is a better business strategy.

Yes, you are correct and this is NOT a new Snow Leopard feature. My late 2008 MacBook already does GPU assisted decode of H264 video. You can confirm this quite easily by playing a 1080p video on any unibody MacBook and note that it doesn't even require 25% of one CPU core to do the decoding. Meanwhile, my 2.66GHz Intel Mac Pro requires almost 100% of a CPU core to decode the same video. Thus, Apple's claim that this is a new Snow Leopard feature is quite dubious. Basically, all they are doing is officially acknowledging something that they had already implemented last year (under Leopard).

Wrong.

I remember people complaining it was difficult to click on a file without getting it to "Preview". Maybe that's why Apple decided not to include it - how annoying would it be that when you go to open a file that you can't click the middle of it?

As stated, Quick Look is the best feature in a while. I love how I don't need to open CS3, MS Office, or any other resource hogging app and still view a file. The Icon Preview is a good idea in thought, but Quick Look is the best way to go.

I ran SL beta for a few days. You can enlarge the icons a bit and it becomes easier.

Always thought that OSX's decoding performance was terrible... and for no reason really. Even if H.264 acceleration is only for the 9400M, why can't we have MPEG2 accelleration? Every ATI and Nvidia card around these days has hardware acceleration for MPEG1&2. I know it's not that big a deal anymore, so Apple development doesn't probably care... but it would be nice to see my Apple DVD player only take 10% CPU like it should when playing movies.

Hey and how come OpenCL isn't making more waves here?

My DVD player only uses like 5%. iBook, MacBook and MacBook Pro.

I hate people stating things they don't really now. Some say older MacBooks don't support 3 and 4 finger gestures because they don't have the "iPhone's multitouch chip" or because they have older hardware. There is proof that old MacBook can recognize gestures with more than 2 fingers, linux.

Not only that but read carefully to what Apple wrote on the upcoming features of Snow Leopard:



Source: http://www.apple.com/macosx/refinements/enhancements-refinements.html#systempref

It is not saying "older MacBook Air and MacBook Pro models" or "All MacBook Air and MacBook Pro models". It is refering to ALL Mac notebooks. Apple is very careful in what they state.

And don't give me that crap that only because they said "Multi-Touch trackpads" they don't mean older MacBooks. The idiot who said that a mouse is multi-touch is retarded. You don't touch buttons, you PRESS them for them to click. With 2-finger gestures (scrolling) you have to TOUCH using MULTIPLE fingers, meaning more than one.

Wrong. Linux supports multi touch for MacBook Pros! Not the plastic MacBooks. I never saw a single video with a MacBook on Linux using multi touch gestures (more than 2 fingers). You don't "now" (it's know which proves you have shoddy spelling) either. White MacBooks NEVER has, have or will support multi touch gestures, more than 2 fingers. Not in Linux, Mac, Windows or otherwise.
 
Pre-uMBP supports multi touch gestures! NOT PLASTIC MACBOOK!

All of you people claiming that plastic MacBooks can support multi touch gestures are wrong. On Linux, that driver only supports MacBook Pros, not the plastic MacBooks. Any plastic MacBook (white or black) NEVER has, have, or will support multi touch gestures due to the controller chip in the trackpad. That is fact. However, the pre-uMBPs will support multi touch gestures due to the controller supporting that. Apple probably didn't enable it because the trackpad was way too small in size and not as accurate. Four fingers is really cramped on the older trackpads.
 
Regarding multi-touch...

Merriam Webster:

Multi-
  • Main Entry: multi-
  • Function: combining form
  • Etymology: Latin, from multus much, many — more at meliorate
1 a : many : multiple : much <multivalent> b : more than two <multilateral>
 
Six pages and NO ONE has mentioned the fact that icon previews are a complete no-show?

This feature received a lot of attention from Apple during that big SL presentation they gave a little while ago. It was probably in my top 5 things to look forward to in SL. I'm already running the GM, and it's nowhere to be found. :-(

What I'm talking about: http://mac101.net/content/reviews/snow-leopard-preview-finder-icon-previews/

Its in there. Used them a few times today.

The entire QuickTime X saga is truly odd. It's in Snow Leopard and it's new, yet it comes off as unfinished. Your only output options are save as and sharing (to iTunes, MobileMe and YouTube only).

QuickTime X is the new iMovie '08.

And although they ship QuickTime 7 on the install DVD, it's not the Pro version. You still have to buy the Pro version of 7 in Snow Leopard.


QT X is the beginnings of the newly redesigned QT. Its going to take some time for QTX to overtake QT so QT7 is included. QTX is at the moment ONLY for playback. It takes up dramatically less resources than QT to do the same playback. It also should be faster. So you should see QT die over the next 2-3 years as QTX gains momentum.

Having just read this about QuickTime X needing the 9400M for the new features, I won't be upgrading. I was all set on Snow Leopard but damn, that is one lame ass decision made by Apple. My 8600M GT is perfectly capable of doing the same thing.

Remember when Apple was content on supporting it's hardware for years? Pssshhh...my ONE year old MBP isn't even enough now.

And your 8600M GT will work fine with QTX. Its just it won't do hardware decoding - just like now. Nothing different. There is *so* much in SL that's nice that not upgrading because of that is like not dating a woman because she has a freckle on her scalp.
 
And your 8600M GT will work fine with QTX. Its just it won't do hardware decoding - just like now. Nothing different. There is *so* much in SL that's nice that not upgrading because of that is like not dating a woman because she has a freckle on her scalp.
Hardware video decoding is a very big thing nowadays. The fact that the Apple barely supports it is mind boggling.

Someone of us would rather not use our CPU to decode video.
 
Off Topic / Best Wishes

Safe travels, Cromulent. Let's hope we've all got shiny new MacBook Tablets by the time you get back! :apple:

I hope my copy arrives on Friday or Saturday as I am going away for 6 - 12 months on Monday and want to have a play around before I am deprived of my computer for an extended period of time :).
 
9400M isn't the only one. There's a list of support models that you forgot to read.
9400M is an example. There are many more supported models. Notebooks have less computing power, so it's easier to make a point when advertising performance boosts.
Apple never said "8600M doesn't work". They said the 9400M as an example, because it's newer and the 8600M had lots of bad press (failure rates) and is old hardware. Advertising new hardware is a better business strategy.
It says computers with that GPU, doesn't say you need to be using it.
Incorrect, only OpenCL works with older graphics cards. H.264 decoding only works with 9400/9600M equipped laptops(includes macbooks).
In addition: Laptops equipped with both 9400M + 9600M GPUs can utilize both cards at the same time for increased performance, especially with OpenCL.


Only unibody multi-touch is supported.
Incorrect, any macbook pro with multi-toch (includes early,mid-2008 models which are NOT unibody) is supported.




Anyone else know of hardware that is not yet supported in SL?
http://snowleopard.wikidot.com/start
 
Default gamma changed!

The default has now changed from 1.8 to 2.2 "to better serve the color needs of digital content producers and consumers". Personally, I think that this is a good thing, but I'm sure it's going to cause some heartache for people wondering why things "look different" (as opposed to just 'think different'!)

:cool:
 
There is no "Put Back" option in my SL 10A432... Can somebody confirm that it is implemented?

The default has now changed from 1.8 to 2.2 "to better serve the color needs of digital content producers and consumers". Personally, I think that this is a good thing, but I'm sure it's going to cause some heartache for people wondering why things "look different" (as opposed to just 'think different'!)

:cool:

I have to say that for me a default gamma of 2.2 is is the biggest and most important change so far!
 
QuickTime X performance on older machines...

For those of you with complaining that Snow Leopard sucks because it's not going to use your non-9400M graphics card, you might be interested to know that you will still see less CPU usage playing video on Snow Leopard.

In my tests, playing the 720p "Artbeats RED Demo Reel.mov" from Apple's HD H.264 website on a Santa Rosa MacBook Pro (which has a GeForce 8600M), I saw 74.1 seconds of CPU time used to decode the movie on Leopard with Quicktime 7, and 55.5 seconds of CPU time with Snow Leopard, in other words 25% less CPU time. I suspect that the benefit is from QuickTime X being 64-bit, rather than it using the video card.

As others have said, there is some chance that Apple may add support for other cards in future releases, but even if they don't, Snow Leopard makes your machine run better than it did when you bought it.
 
For those of you with complaining that Snow Leopard sucks because it's not going to use your non-9400M graphics card, you might be interested to know that you will still see less CPU usage playing video on Snow Leopard.

In my tests, playing the 720p "Artbeats RED Demo Reel.mov" from Apple's HD H.264 website on a Santa Rosa MacBook Pro (which has a GeForce 8600M), I saw 74.1 seconds of CPU time used to decode the movie on Leopard with Quicktime 7, and 55.5 seconds of CPU time with Snow Leopard, in other words 25% less CPU time. I suspect that the benefit is from QuickTime X being 64-bit, rather than it using the video card.

As others have said, there is some chance that Apple may add support for other cards in future releases, but even if they don't, Snow Leopard makes your machine run better than it did when you bought it.

Am I right in saying that my month old 3.06 GHz iMac with the ATI Radeon HD 4850 won't run this?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.