I think Steve Winter should get more credit for his work. It is amazing. I wonder what kind of camera he uses?
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Snow Leopard Build 10A421 Seeded to Developers
- Thread starter nozebleed
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I think Steve Winter should get more credit for his work. It is amazing. I wonder what kind of camera he uses?
isnt there a way to see what camera was used by seeing the properties or something? I know when you upload it to deviant art it shows what camera was used
I didn't say there was.
But everyone knows its used to download BitTorrent's, so not only is he flashing off his personal email to the www. but in this current climate, where illegal downloaders are being clamped down on, I'd say he didn't think before he took a screen shot of his desktop and posted it up on here - Hence being a bit of a Bozo...
Just made me laugh, that's all...
Apple (and 3rd party developers) usually ship "universal" applications that contain x86 (Intel) and PowerPC binary segments. This same feature is also used to include x86-64 and PowerPC 64 (aka 64b version). This allows you to run the same application on various hardware without having to worry about an installer, etc.
You can use the terminal (or Finder) to understand what segments an application contains. /me points at file
For example...
Code:
$ file /Applications/iTunes.app/Contents/MacOS/iTunes
/Applications/iTunes.app/Contents/MacOS/iTunes: Mach-O universal binary with 2 architectures
/Applications/iTunes.app/Contents/MacOS/iTunes (for architecture ppc): Mach-O executable ppc
/Applications/iTunes.app/Contents/MacOS/iTunes (for architecture i386): Mach-O executable i386There probably is. I'll see if I can find anything, but I doubt it'll be easy to find.
How do we find it? Maybe we can find it in the Leopard wallpapers. I'd like to see this.
Multi-core is a, if not the, primary focus of Snow Leopard both in terms of the OS itself, the services it provides and enabling developers to more easily leverage multiple cores (not just talking CPU cores either).
64bit of iTunes, iLife and iWork will come out whenever they want, they are not dependent on Snow Leopard. The only thing that's dependent of SL is GCD/OpenCL. Remember that 64bit apps can run on Leopard, so they could release 64bit version of those anytime they want. I don't see any reason to have 64bit for iWork but it's still nice to have it. iTunes requires a complete rewrite to have 64bit as it still have a lot of carbon code in the current version.
I don't expect to see any GCD/OpenCL for those software for at least another year. iWork and iLife '10 will come out in Jan (release history shows they always release yearly in Jan except back in a special media event in Aug '07).
Also, IIRC iTunes is not fully 64bit on Windows, it still has 32bit exe showing on the Task manager whenever somebody has it under 64bit OS.
I couldn't remember before 10.x, i just default to sticking with Mac OS X as default since it is the first major change from the past to modern for Apple.
I don't expect to see any GCD/OpenCL for those software for at least another year. iWork and iLife '10 will come out in Jan (release history shows they always release yearly in Jan except back in a special media event in Aug '07).
Also, IIRC iTunes is not fully 64bit on Windows, it still has 32bit exe showing on the Task manager whenever somebody has it under 64bit OS.
I couldn't remember before 10.x, i just default to sticking with Mac OS X as default since it is the first major change from the past to modern for Apple.
I know. I thought I could find it for the ones in Leopard, but I looked and it was gone.
Really? As far as remember, stacks weren't blurring content behind them... Anyone here with an older build can verify?
Not always, it showed up in 10a394 build or after WWDC build.
The blur effect started in 10a411a.