Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Another possible reason for converting everything to Cocoa: Resolution Independence. While the underlying frameworks have been present in 10.4 and 10.5, there were always more issues getting Carbon-based programs to work with it. Perhaps that's why they haven't made it a main feature yet.
 
That's because you've never used OS X 10.3.9. Quite possibly the best OS that Apple has ever released.

True dat... But don't you think that this is a return to that era?

Also, I've found that the new Tiger and Leopard were very stable in my use. What made the difference for me is when I had so many 3rd party apps installed. They caused so many issues it wasn't funny. The more I deleted the ones that were obscure or that I had no use for, the system got more and more stable.

Just my (humble) 2 cents.
 
Heh, that is complete rubbish. VMs have nothing to do with breaking an encryption scheme or not.

No, but they give a vector of attack on a DRM scheme that tries to keep everything from disc to eyes encrypted and locked down tighter than a drum. A VM would let you circumvent some of the anti-debugger technology baked into an OS that makes these players 'immune' to normal means of reverse engineering the encryption parts of the player, or letting someone grab the encryption keys straight from RAM.
 
Simply if Macbooks have permanently lost the Firewire by then, I will be switching back to PC's.

Wow.... That's... uh... pretty extreme, don't you think? Why not just upgrade to the MB Pro? I mean, switching back to crappy, no-innovation, spyware/adware/virus-prone Windoze because of no firewire on a consumer portable seems extreme to me.

(Not trying to be rude, I'm genuinely curious.)
 
Another possible reason for converting everything to Cocoa: Resolution Independence. While the underlying frameworks have been present in 10.4 and 10.5, there were always more issues getting Carbon-based programs to work with it. Perhaps that's why they haven't made it a main feature yet.

I had kind of forgotten about resolution independence, but 10.6 does seem like a good release to introduce resolution independence... especially since it seems like they're working on all this under the hood cleaning, refactoring, and rewrites.

Maybe we'll start seeing higher resolution Macs after Snow Leopard comes out? Will we see 1440x900 on 13” MBs? 1680x1050 on 15” MBPs? I’m pretty sure PC notebooks have had the option for those resolutions for quite a while now… correct me if I’m wrong though…
 
How about if they incorporated Apple Remote Desktop into the new Cocoa Finder and make it FREE!!!. :eek:

I know it's nowhere near the same, but you can kinda sorta do that now with Screen Sharing in the finder. Also, you can use iChat theater to do some of what Remote Desktop does.

Just an idea.
 
What's the benefit of Cocoa?

I guess I could Google this, but I prefer to ask you all because the explanations here are always better...

What is Cocoa and how does the Finder (or any other app for that matter [I see iTunes was mentioned]) benefit from being written in it?

Pardon the ignorance.
 
Simply if Macbooks have permanently lost the Firewire by then, I will be switching back to PC's.
Dude! I don't get what the big deal is!

1) I have never used FireWire in my lefe and see no use for it.
2) You can buy a Firewire to USB adapter
3) Buy a white MacBook if you need Firewire so bad, and do not want to pay a whoppin extra 700 dollars. Not only that, buying a white MacBook is $300 cheaper than getting the alumnium one. You save money.
 
2) You can buy a Firewire to USB adapter

He's looking for USB to Firewire. I don't think there is one out there for Mac OS X. I found one for Windows.

There is only one solution. Get off Firewire as soon as possible as recommended by Steve Jobs.

Jobs says and I follow and obey :D!!!
 
I just don't understand why anyone would want to buy a PC ever since Mac moved to Intel.

Damn its the best thing that happened to me. I have all the operating systems loaded on my notebook. I do application and web development all on one machine for each platform. So yes it's worth paying extra for a Mac but its worth it now. :)

I'm a happy puppy. :D
 
How well does it handle USB? my problem is my livescribe pen does not work under parallels and the OSX version is still 2+ months away. also, Parallel, VMS, and Crossover collide with each other, can I have vitual box with one of those?

Seond thought, I won't be trying it. the only reason I would would be for my Livescribe Pulse pen. However in reading livescribe forums, it seems the pen is recognized, but the livescribe desktop has a problem seeing the Pen. this is true on Parallels, and Virtual Box (even Virtual Box for Linux). Some people had gotten it to work with VMware 2.0, but it was iffy. seems only Windows PC's and BootCamp is supported at the moment.

:eek: - guess i have to wait till December....
 
I hope Snow Leopard will provide optimization for all Core Dual processors ( including early 2008 machines ), and not just the latest machines released this week.

I imagine it will also provide on the fly switching of graphic cards for the PowerBooks ( EDIT: Macbook Pros )...
 
firewire gone, how about making USB work?

If they're going to drop FireWire, that means losing actual OS features, like target disk mode and external disk boot.

It seems like a minimum is to expect the OSX team will provide those features for USB.

I am personally pretty pissed off about the FireWire thing. USB2 is simply not as robust for drives and I have a lot of FW hardware around.

I guess I'm expecting this means they will drop FireWire from the mac mini next. And then iMacs?

Arguments I've read about the 'expense' of including it are completely baseless, the chip cost and heat dissipation costs are non-existent. If port space is the limitation, then go with the mini FW.
 
Seond thought, I won't be trying it. the only reason I would would be for my Livescribe Pulse pen. However in reading livescribe forums, it seems the pen is recognized, but the livescribe desktop has a problem seeing the Pen. this is true on Parallels, and Virtual Box (even Virtual Box for Linux). Some people had gotten it to work with VMware 2.0, but it was iffy. seems only Windows PC's and BootCamp is supported at the moment.

:eek: - guess i have to wait till December....

Did you try the latest update virtualbox 2.0.2?
 
Really excited about 10.6!

Someone wanted to call it more a 10.5.x update than a real new 10.6... :confused: ARE YOU NUTS???
Snow Leopard seems a HUGE new OS. Open CL, Grand Central, Cocoa Finder, "Real" Exchange support, QuickTime X....

OpenCL and Grand Central have merit, "Real" Exchange support is debatable but I guess in the end it's useful, but so far nothing of substance has actually come up for Quicktime X... my best guess is Apple is finally depreciating all of the old Carbon Quicktime APIs and finally making a complete shift to QTKit and possibly eliminating a few older unneeded codecs from the default install. Can't get excited over something when all I have is Apple's marketing rubbish on their website to go by.

Maybe, just maybe, Snow Leopard will come with some sort of rewriting of the Ethernet drivers so that FW over Ethernet becomes possible.

Yes the wiki on 1394c implies that hardware changes are needed too, but maybe with Apple's control they might find a way of doing it in software. (especially if the aim is to recreate 4-pin FW i.e. with no bus power)

Software isn't going to cut it. It's theoretically possible that Apple already has the chipset implemented to support IEEE 1394c AND Ethernet in the same port like what they did with 802.11n on some old notebooks requiring an updater (or Leopard) to get n, but it's not likely any older than a generation or two, and so far rumors of Apple supporting 1394c are just that, rumors.

Bring back the best MAC OS Finder :mad: and add more features!!!
MAC OS X finder SUCKS!!! I don't want anything else.

I'm curious, what are those tab looking things at the bottom? I hated using OS 9 on school computers, but I never got the chance to fully explore the OS either.

Sorry to dampen the high spirits but a Cocoa implementation of the Finder would work exactly the same as the Carbon one. I expect the only reason they are doing this is so they can make a 64-bit implementation as they scrapped their 64 Carbon support.

It would in no way be inherently faster or more stable just because they have changed the framework.

However a rewrite is a good excuse for apple to add a number of new features and sort out a number of problems. Let's hope they get it right this time.

No, it wouldn't work exactly the same, Cut and Paste might actually work!

I hope Snow Leopard is completely, fully 64-bit Cocoa :D Also hope the re-written apps will get some new features... Like Finder tabs. And a new(ish) UI. No aqua! I like aqua, it looks nice, but it's too distracting.

It's not distracting if you change the theme to Graphite instead of leaving the stoplight in place.

Sebastian
 
Is anyone else concerned that Snow Leopard will make a lot of third party apps inoperable?

I'm still new to Apple. How did third party apps work when you made a major OS update in the past (i.e., Leopard)?
 
Is anyone else concerned that Snow Leopard will make a lot of third party apps inoperable?

I'm still new to Apple. How did third party apps work when you made a major OS update in the past (i.e., Leopard)?

That was my concern with the post below:

As long as Snow Leopard keeps backward compatibility to all the apps I just bought or downloaded this year (and not like how Vista is not backward compatible), I will be happy.. I bought a macbook in april, a mini in August, and all new apps to get rid of what I was doing in MS (well, except where MS had better, or the app did not have an OSX version - which is why I still have 5 software packages running on XP in parallels).

So, I am out about $3,500 or so for my entire platform conversion.

I can't afford to replace everything if I want to speed up my systems using Snow Leopard.
 
I'm curious, what are those tab looking things at the bottom? I hated using OS 9 on school computers, but I never got the chance to fully explore the OS either.
Sebastian

It's your tab folders. You form them by dragging a Finder folder to the bottom of the screen where it turned into a multi-level hierarchical menu.

Its the same way you drop a Finder folder onto the Dock.

In OS 9 they had separate Tab Folders (at the bottom) and Application Menu (along the bottom on top of the Tab Folders) where else today they have it all on the Dock.

Yes, I hated using school computers as well but that's because someone kept changing your configurations. No concept of roles at that time. Everyone can change anything. But that's true for any operating systems at that time. :)
 
I thought Snow Leopard is supposed to focus on stability and not new features. Am I the only one who considers a complete rewrite of Finder something that could affect stability?
 
Winter is upon us. Snow Leopard. Cocoa...

Winter. Snow. Cocoa.

Christmas release date!
nahhh.... at WWDC Jobs said it'll be released in about a year. That means probably WWDC 2009... but a Christmas release date would be awesome!!
 
sorry for the noob q, if I get a new mb, will I have to pay for snow lepod? Is it like xp to vista?

If you get a new mb today and Apple releases Snow Leopard like 29 days later you likely will get a free upgrade, but no promises.

There's no compelling reason to run the very latest OS. I'm still using 10.4.11 and until I have a absolute need to upgrade, I likely won't.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.