Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Actually, all of the quad-core Core i7 processors have a TDP of 45 watts. So it's probably not a power consumption concern. More likely, it's a concern about Turbo Boost. As seen in the attached Wikipedia screenshot, quad-core mobile Skylake processors with Iris Pro graphics can only boost one core's operating frequency at a time while models with HD Graphics can boost all four cores' operating frequency simultaneously.

I think it would be price as the main reason. Or shipping date. Or the fact the Iris Pro CPU is 100MHz slower.
 
So what you're suggesting is that Apple probably originally planned on including the 70 series HQ processors, but Intel failed to deliver? This honestly seems quite plausible.

Precisely. They're vapor, as far as I can tell. Although there is a $55-$56 difference in tray price, I'm sure Apple would have gone with the Iris Pro chips if Intel could have delivered. In addition to getting 3x the EUs (72 vs 24), they also would have gotten the 128 MB eDRAM L4 cache which boosts CPU performance as well. Although the Iris Pro 580 and HD Graphics 530 chips have the same TDP (45W), I'm sure there is a difference in the dynamic range of their power consumption. While wider GPUs can use less power to do similar amounts of work as smaller ones, if you crank them up, they're going to use more juice.

I almost wonder if the batteries being smaller than their compartments in the 15-inch models is the result of not being able to get sufficient volume in the required bins of the 4+4e parts late in the design cycle. That, or some tragic bug that made them generally unsellable, like the first stepping of Thunderbolt 3 controllers which was also broken.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Val-kyrie
Apparently you only need to have passed high school science with a B+ in order to work in Apples Engineering Dpt.

God I hope Ivey goes to hell. I want to slap his face every time I see it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrcobra92
I'd say it's level pegging with the Apple-Hating-Pile-On-Every-Insignificant-Issue Syndrome.

The dongle stupidity.

The blocky-screen 460 video adapters.

Slower TB3's on one side of the 13 inch model.

The fake speaker grills on the 13.

The skyrocketing price increases.

The 4-5 week delays in getting product (once again).

Speaker issues in bootcamp.

Incompatibility with many TB3/USB-C devices.

Last year's processor in this year's notebook.

- Just to name a few.

Maybe they can fix some of these with software, maybe they can't.


But how many more things need to pile on before people start admitting there is something rwong at Apple?
 
well the graphics are inside the CPU, so what CPU is it shipping with? The HD 530 mobile quad CPUs were out in Sept 2015, then the Iris Pro version came out in March 2016 (probably after Apple made the order as Intel likes to screw with them). Maybe this is Apple screwing them back?

Actually no, it should be HD 530. Apple is selling the 6700HQ, 6820HQ and 6920HQ.
 
The dongle stupidity.

The blocky-screen 460 video adapters.

Slower TB3's on one side of the 13 inch model.

The fake speaker grills on the 13.

The skyrocketing price increases.

The 4-5 week delays in getting product (once again).

Speaker issues in bootcamp.

Incompatibility with many TB3/USB-C devices.

Last year's processor in this year's notebook.

- Just to name a few.

Maybe they can fix some of these with software, maybe they can't.


But how many more things need to pile on before people start admitting there is something rwong at Apple?

MIC DROP.
 
Apple Apologetic Syndrome is peaking in this post.

Really? That is one of the very few posts on the entire forum where someone is actually attempting to have a discussion instead of posting trash like "Courage" or mindlessly bashing Apple over the tiniest things (like this article!)

I personally welcome thoughtful discussions, despite the wishes of many around here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TMRJIJ
Actually, all of the quad-core Core i7 processors have a TDP of 45 watts. So it's probably not a power consumption concern. More likely, it's a concern about Turbo Boost. As seen in the attached Wikipedia screenshot, quad-core mobile Skylake processors with Iris Pro graphics can only boost one core's operating frequency at a time while models with HD Graphics can boost all four cores' operating frequency simultaneously.
That's not an N/A, it's a question mark. Nobody knows the 2 or 4 core boost clocks because they're not listed in ARK, and there are no shipping products with those CPUs. Intel paper launched them in Q1 2016, but where are they?
 
Theirs so many back and forths about this machine. I mean. They have to be faster than last years MacBook Pro.

I guess that depends on how you plan to use it. Because as far as I can tell, the integrated graphics on last year's model are way faster.

Skylake Iris Pro GPUs boost performance by including 128MB of eDRAM and more execution units. But the new 15-inch models now use Intel HD 530 GPUs without any eDRAM, so all the heavy lifting has to be done by the dedicated GPUs.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Val-kyrie
I feel like these MacBook Pros are Apple's Windows Vista.
I just picked up a new 13" MacBook Pro with Touch Bar and I am absolutely in love with it. I bought the USB C adapters but so far haven't used them. I am sure I will when I get around to connecting my monitor but all-in-all, I am 100% satisfied with my new laptop. To be fair, I am not a power user (developer, creative professional, etc).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: melendezest
I really hate that people think of us this way. I, and many other people in my life, work hard for the things they want.

It's fun to blame people with no agency for all the problems in the world. How many millennials are governors, presidents, congresspeople, or state representatives? How many run major corporations?

Stupid millennials raising taxes and hiring illegal immigrants and sending all our jobs overseas! Oh, they make me so mad! How dare they not be exactly the same as me!!!
 
The dongle stupidity.

The blocky-screen 460 video adapters.

Slower TB3's on one side of the 13 inch model.

The fake speaker grills on the 13.

The skyrocketing price increases.

The 4-5 week delays in getting product (once again).

Speaker issues in bootcamp.

Incompatibility with many TB3/USB-C devices.

Last year's processor in this year's notebook.

- Just to name a few.

Maybe they can fix some of these with software, maybe they can't.


But how many more things need to pile on before people start admitting there is something rwong at Apple?
Almost all of your bullet points are based on ignorance. 1, 3-6, 7 and 8 are all based on logical fallacies or a basic misunderstanding of the technology.
 
It was, so people can say things like "They did this on purpose" and "This is Apple's Vista" hysterically. This forum loves things like this more than anything else.

Wait for the Tim Cook should be fired dude.

The problem is this is just another item in a steady stream of bugs that should have been caught, to go along with dropping features or configurations that a lot of people still wanted, as well as other questionable product and pricing decisions.
 
It was, so people can say things like "They did this on purpose" and "This is Apple's Vista" hysterically. This forum loves things like this more than anything else.

Wait for the Tim Cook should be fired dude.

Balanced out by the people who come up with fantastic reasons to explain every issue, big or small.
[doublepost=1479479633][/doublepost]

Totally.
 
Everyone is going to pile on Apple for this, since that's the cool thing to do on the Internet right now, but this is simply an errant string in this particular build of MacOS causing System Information to misreport the GPU. It in no way affects anything performance wise.

The more interesting takeaway is why Apple isn't shipping the SKL-H 4+4e SKUs when one certainly would have expected them to. Clearly this string being present means that at some point the OS team thought it might be used. So of course everyone will say "margins" or "greed", but the reality is that Intel have entirely failed to deliver 14nm mobile 4+4e. The last HQ Iris Pro part seen in the wild aside from an Intel NUC was in the Haswell era. Hence the last 15-inch MBP used Haswell Refresh.
Wait! What's this: https://www.amazon.com/Intel-NUC-Ki...8&qid=1479479551&sr=8-2&keywords=Intel+i7+nuc
Available today with amazon prime with iris pro 580 igpu which not only speeds up GPU operation on battery it also significantly speeds up the CPU courtesy of its edram cache that's missing in the 530. That's why haswell rmbp come close to the gimped 1 year old CPU that Apple is using.

BTW this has been available for 6 months - with no shortage - now AND Apple is one of the very few laptop manufacturers to use iris pro in their laptops. I think Apple was forced to use the weaker skylake due to their thinner chassis as likely the 580 variant doesn't do very well when restricted to run in a thin chassis..
 
Last edited:
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
If you turn off "automatic graphics switching" in the Energy Saver System Preference, it will report correct info. I think it's just reporting what is active at the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cerberusss
The problem is this is just another item in a steady stream of bugs that should have been caught, to go along with dropping features or configurations that a lot of people still wanted, as well as other questionable product and pricing decisions.
So basically what you're saying is that to thousands of Internet commenters who have never used these new MacBook Pros, Apple didn't build exactly what they wanted, and they're too expensive.

What are the "steady stream of bugs" other than the video issue affecting a single 15-inch GPU configuration, and an audio issue when running Windows? Would you say the new MacBook Pros are more or less buggy than the Dell XPS 13 or Surface Pro on release?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RMD68
Totally new product. I'm sure these things will be resolved via software fixes. If not, that's why there's a year warranty or the 3 years of AppleCare options. Or worst case, return policy. I just ordered one last night, so I'll be hoping for the best.

Bolded is mine to point out that is the most apple kool-aid thing you could say. "Buy their additional warranty so they can fix the crap they didn't design well." Sounds like a "feature" to me. And don't even try to say "if you can afford a $2.4k machine, you can afford a few hundred dollar warranty".
[doublepost=1479480118][/doublepost]
Yeah... It's a software bug that has zero use impact, in a newly released product . It'll be quickly fixed. Shocker.

Still, it'll certainly be whine-worthy for many here.

Don't excuse poor programming. This is coming from the company that couldn't fix their daylight savings bug over 2 years. And yet they were thinking about controlling my car? Yeah.. no thanks.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.