Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I understand not allowing them in the cargo hold. They have been a couple of tragic plane crashes due to batteries catching fire in the hold, such us that UPS 747 incident.
However, not allowing their use in their cabin... give me a break. Just train the cabin crew to be mindful of burnt chemical smells and make sure they know where the fire extinguisher are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrUNIMOG
Apple needs to offer a water marked one application/void upon removal sticker identifying these notebooks as certified by Apple and obtainable at any Apple store or authorized repair center. And communicate the meaning to airlines and security. Simple and straight forward putting verification as Apple’s responsibility and not clog up security lines.




Following Apple's recall of some 2015 15-inch MacBook Pro models with faulty batteries, airlines around the world are starting to implement bans, some of which affect other non-impacted MacBook Pro models.

Qantas airlines, for example, told Bloomberg that all 15-inch MacBook Pro models are banned from checked luggage and must remain switched off for the duration of the flight. That ban applies not only to machines with faulty batteries, but also perfectly fine MacBook Pro models not subject to recall.

macbook_pro_recall-800x418.jpg

Virgin Australia, meanwhile, has banned "all Apple MacBooks" from checked luggage, requiring customers to put their MacBooks in their carry-on luggage.

Singapore Airlines and Thai Airways have both posted warnings on their website letting customers know that affected 2015 15-inch MacBook Pro models cannot be brought on board at all unless those models have received a replacement battery.

At the beginning of August, the European Union Aviation Safety Agency issued warnings to aircraft operators reminding them that affected 15-inch MacBook Pro models with faulty batteries should be kept switched off during flight.

The United States Federal Aviation Administration gave similar warnings to U.S. airlines, reminding them of recall rules that prevent affected MacBook Pro models that have not received replacement batteries from being placed in checked luggage. United Airlines, one of the major operators in the U.S., asks passengers not to use affected models during flight.

Apple launched a voluntary recall and replacement program for 2015 15-inch MacBook Pro models sold between September 2015 and February 2017 as the models contain batteries that can overheat and pose a fire safety risk.

Apple has been offering free replacement batteries since June and a 15-inch MacBook Pro that has had a battery repair is no longer in danger of overheating and can be safely used on airplanes and other locations.

Unfortunately, there is no easy way for an airline to determine what year a MacBook Pro is from and further, whether it's had a battery replacement, which is leading to confusing rules on MacBook Pro usage that vary from airline to airline. Difficulty checking model numbers also makes it hard to enforce bans, and it's not clear how strict each airline is with the rules, which could lead to some non-banned models being flagged.

Customers who have a 15-inch MacBook Pro from 2015 who have not replaced the battery should contact Apple immediately for a free replacement. Apple sold approximately 432,000 potentially affected units in the United States, along with 26,000 in Canada.

Article Link: Some Airlines Banning All MacBook Pros From Checked Luggage and Preventing Use During Flights
 
I am nervous, especially considering that TSA agents aren't going to be able to differentiate. Even with the newer 2016+ MacBook Pro, I feel like I'll eventually be stopped as I travel quite a bit. NOT putting that in my checked bag. Maybe I'll print out a screenshot of the "you're not affected" page.
I think you've got it the wrong way around. You can no longer put it in checked luggage but must carry it with you. I'm not sure this'll affect many people as most would carry their laptops onboard anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrUNIMOG
Shareholders have been very happy under Cook. Ask me how I know.

Investors are no longer worried about iPhone sales because we understand the company and its new direction after building such a vibrant user base and serviceS/wearables businesses thanks to Tim Cook.

Just because some airlines decided to overreact and ban stuff that’s not even problem, doesn’t mean there is some crisis at Apple. This is limited to a specific model year.

It’s a damn disaster no matter how you try to spin this. Yeah, is one model. But they all look alike and airlines aren’t going to take the time to figure out which model or year it is. This will be the cause of countless headaches and a DISASTROUS hit to brand image. Yeesh. And as far as Apple being a service / wearables company, LOL. That all hinges on iPhone. No Apple Watch success without iPhone. No iCloud success without iPhone. No Apple Music without iPhone etc. I don’t care where their revenue comes from, pretending like they aren’t an iPhone company is simply delusional. It’s still 48% of their revenue.
 
That's thinking like a business traveler. Consider if you're a photographer, videographer, or going to a trade show and are taking along large amounts of equipment. The ideal situation is to toss everything in a travel case and check it in, and not split things up into multiple cases, drag equipment through passenger security, and mix things in with your personal belongings to get left at the hotel.

Therefore, a tiny fraction of the overall population.
 
One of my coworkers had his affected 15" MBP serviced. It took him 1.5 weeks for a turn around. I suspect that is one of the big deterrents for getting their Macs serviced. If you ask me, Apple should start providing a loaner for Mac repairs.

Also, Apple should use push notification on affected Macs.
 
But the first laptop with rechargeable batteries was sold in 1982.

NiCd and lead acid batteries are very different than Li-Ion. They aren't made with an electrolyte that's basically as flammable as gasoline. They don't continue to burn in the absence of air. That's why Li-Ion batteries are a specific hazard.

NiCd and lead acid batteries are not flammable by themselves; a lead acid battery is a bunch of lead plates and acid, they're worried more about the acid leaking.

Similarly, lithium metal batteries are even more dangerous because they contain metal that is reactive with water. They are even more tightly restricted than Li-Ion.

In sum, batteries are all very different and the hazards are not comparable.
 
Last edited:
As annoying as this is, its the only way that any sort of ban was going to work. No one is going to look at serial numbers or ask for the laptop to be booted up to show that its OK and not part of the ban.
 
NiCd and lead acid batteries are very different than Li-Ion. They aren't made with an electrolyte that's basically as flammable as gasoline. They don't continue to burn in the absence of air. That's why Li-Ion batteries are a specific hazard.

Similarly, lithium metal batteries are even more dangerous because they contain metal that is reactive with water. They are even more tightly restricted than Li-Ion.

In sum, batteries are all very different and the hazards are not comparable.
Any charged battery can cause a fire if shorted.
 
That's thinking like a business traveler. Consider if you're a photographer, videographer, or going to a trade show and are taking along large amounts of equipment. The ideal situation is to toss everything in a travel case and check it in, and not split things up into multiple cases, drag equipment through passenger security, and mix things in with your personal belongings to get left at the hotel.

We ship everything separately so it's properly insured and likely to arrive. Relying on the airlines checked bags for something critical is just asking for trouble. I've had my bags lost too many times when I've been forced to check something, so even then I bring an 'emergency' kit in my carry on.
 
Alright, if they’re going to do it that they might as well ban any laptop with a lithium ion battery. In other words, ban all laptops.
The problem with that logic is that not all laptops with a lithium ion battery have been recalled.

The airlines have been told to look out for a specific 15" macbook pro, but as someone that used to fly for a living I can tell you that most aren't going to entertain a passenger who says "mine has been fixed" or "this isn't affected". A blanket response is always the best response in these situations. Unfortunately that response hinders the customer a bit, but the safety of the other 200 souls on board is more important than three or four people that are inconvenienced by the policy.
 
In June 2019, Apple announced a worldwide recall for its 2015 15" MacBook Pro due to a potential overheating and fire-safety risk. It was determined that 432,000 units were affected with reports of minor burns, smoke inhalation and property damage. The company asked customers to stop using their MacBook Pros until they could be repaired with replacement batteries.

And, Apple reassures ... just a small number were affected.
[Sadly, the airlines do not drink kool-aid.]
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.