This is a very different situation from the Note 7. The 2015 15” is over 4 years old now and most love it. This is an inconvenience for sure but it won’t have the impact it would’ve had this happened back in 2015.
The point is not that the risk is smaller but that a battery could have started the fire on that plane.Then why don't AA cells have overcurrent protection? It can start a fire, i.e. you use a lighter, but the risk isn't significant.
Again, Li-Ion cells are a particular and severe hazard that is not present in most other types, save Li metal and some of the exotic chemistries like Li-SOCl2.
Going back to your original post, you might want to read your liked article carefully about suspected smuggled military weapons during the period of apartheid. You simply chose a bad example of a crash that predated commercial Li-Ion use.
Impressive but in 8 years under Steve it went from about $2.5B to about $40B. For the same percentage in improvement. Apple would need to be worth $4.8T today under Tim Cook. Obviously TC is a bad CEO compared to SJ.![]()
Laptops are allowed in both carryon and checked bags, along with most devices that contain lithium-ion batteries whose sole function is not charging a device (i.e., power banks). Those must be in carryon bags.
Because crews sometimes put out fires in the cabin, and fires in the cargo hold have brought down planes.What's the reasoning behind allowing affected MacBook Pro's on the plane in a carry-on vs not allowing them in a check baggage?
It doesn't make any sense to me. As a matter of fact, I would think that allowing it in a carry-on poses more risk. Aren't the checkin "bins" designed to withstand small bomb explosions? - I would think the faulty laptop would be safer there than inside the cabin.
What's the reasoning behind allowing affected MacBook Pro's on the plane in a carry-on vs not allowing them in a check baggage?
It doesn't make any sense to me. As a matter of fact, I would think that allowing it in a carry-on poses more risk. Aren't the checkin "bins" designed to withstand small bomb explosions? - I would think the faulty laptop would be safer there than inside the cabin.
Time to vote with our dollars! Let's start compiling a list of airlines that are mac friendly vs those that aren't, so we know with whom we can fly.
You know what I love, my 12" MacBook Retina.![]()
You can control a fire in the cabin by isolating it from flammables (tossing it into the metal bathroom or galley sink), dowsing surrounding items with water. In the cargo hold, you can't, and it will set surrounding bags on fire.
Very little is effective against Li-Ion fires, including cargo extinguishing systems. It will literally continue to burn underwater.
And no, containers are not designed to contain bombs, and narrowbody aircraft don't typically use containers to begin with, and explosions are different from fires.
I think you've got it the wrong way around. You can no longer put it in checked luggage but must carry it with you. I'm not sure this'll affect many people as most would carry their laptops onboard anyway.
Just playing Devil's advocate here Duke, but I doubt Apple will be affected much by the tariffs, if at all, based on . And it's a blemish for sure, but nowhere near on the scale of a certain Korean company and their flagship phone a couple years backI guess this is the downside to keeping the same product design for a decade. This is going to be a black eye for Apple. I could see many ordinary customers being irritated by this and think twice about buying a MacBook Pro next time—especially with a 30% tariff in the pipeline.
Why don’t they just sedate every passenger and place them in cocoons for each flight? LOL. Insanity.
As the article states, depending on where, it make be OK, as long as you don't use it on the plane.So bringing the macbook pro in Carry-on is ok?
Disaster. Absolute brand image disaster.
Tim Cook is the reason for decreased iPhone sales, NOT people not willing to upgrade.
Wake UP shareholders. Good lord. The guy is not CEO material.
Shareholders have been very happy because the product lines Steve Jobs put in place couldn't lose money if they tried.Shareholders have been very happy under Cook. Ask me how I know.
Investors are no longer worried about iPhone sales because we understand the company and its new direction after building such a vibrant user base and serviceS/wearables businesses thanks to Tim Cook.
Just because some airlines decided to overreact and ban stuff that’s not even problem, doesn’t mean there is some crisis at Apple. This is limited to a specific model year.
I am nervous, especially considering that TSA agents aren't going to be able to differentiate. Even with the newer 2016+ MacBook Pro, I feel like I'll eventually be stopped as I travel quite a bit. NOT putting that in my checked bag. Maybe I'll print out a screenshot of the "you're not affected" page.