Simple Question To A Complex Decision Process. HV20 Is Shipping Now
I have been a loyal Sony customer since the dawn of personal camcorders beginning with a Video 8 camera before I graduated to Hi8, then DV and now HDV. After shooting for about 3 years with the VX-1000, my own experience with the Canon XL1 was not good. Turns out I don't like large or even small big cameras like the VX-1000.
Ever since the TRV-900, I have never wanted a VX-1000 size camera again. Well that puts me in a very unusual class of pros because all the pros are of the opinion that if you use a small camcorder like the HC7 you won't be taken seriously. And for the most part they are right. But for candid shooting, I think anything bigger than a HC7 or the TRV-900/950 is asking for trouble. And I am primarily a candid shooter.
But still, I may wind up with a Sony HVR-V1U if I give up on the small-size feature-retarded preference over a-little-larger full-featured reality I must have to get all jobs done. Maybe one needs both to do different jobs at different times or the HC7 winds up being the B-Roll for the V1U main tent work. But I am 100% certain it would not be any of the Canon Pro options because they all lack HDMI out. Yes the HV20 has HDMI while all the other Canon camcorders do not. Crazy. Oh all the Canon the pro models DO have LANC ports. Go figure.
The CamcorderInfo.com review is full of contradictions and conflicted opinions. I sure wish we could all get an audience with the engineers in Tokyo. Seems like they come up with changes for the sake of changes lately - particularly in the case of the little focus knob instead of the traditional wheel on the lens barrel. That's particularly weird I know.
You know the fact is I am currently leaning toward also buying a HV20 just so I can use it as a deck for my HC7. HV20 is also an analog to digital converter which the HC7 is NOT. That is, it can receive your old analog VHS and 8/Hi8 analog playback and record them on DV tape OR even pass the digital converted signal on to another digital recorder instead. So if you will want to do that, that's another point for wanting the HV20.
And who can forget HV20 will sell for $300 less list ($1,099 in April) which means it will start at street below what the HC7 street will be by then - definitely below $1,000. Could start at $900 or less on day one.
One unique feature the HC7 has no other camcorder in its class has is the ability record in 3 second bursts of high speed so upon playback you get 12 seconds of slow motion. So if you'd like to be able to shoot golf or tennis swings or a horse running that will playback in slow motion, the HC7 is definitley the choice for you. I am certain the HV20 cannot do this.
Oh now or May? That's a personal call only you can make. I don't see how anyone here could tell you what to do. Do you really? I think both cameras are excellent. I have known about the HV20 since January 31st. But as soon as I saw it has no LANC port I put it out of contention. Now that's just me. Everyone says that is a feature few ever use. So fine. In that case I think anyone who is not convinced HC7 is great and doesn't care about remote zoom control should wait and see. I am not really a Canon guy. I own the XL1 and I don't like it. So I am very partial to tiny. And if the HC7 is nothing else it is definitely tiny. Oh I know the Canon HV10 is tiniest. But it not only also has no LANC port, it doesn't have HDMI Out either which the HV20 does have. So while I love tiny, that's within a certain minimum feature set I want:
This is a very personal preference thing. The good news is Canon HV20 started shipping on Monday March 19. I just found out after I started a brand new Canon HV20 Thread a couple of hours ago.I have a simple question. Buy the HC7 now or wait till May and buy either the HV20 or HC7?
I have been a loyal Sony customer since the dawn of personal camcorders beginning with a Video 8 camera before I graduated to Hi8, then DV and now HDV. After shooting for about 3 years with the VX-1000, my own experience with the Canon XL1 was not good. Turns out I don't like large or even small big cameras like the VX-1000.
Ever since the TRV-900, I have never wanted a VX-1000 size camera again. Well that puts me in a very unusual class of pros because all the pros are of the opinion that if you use a small camcorder like the HC7 you won't be taken seriously. And for the most part they are right. But for candid shooting, I think anything bigger than a HC7 or the TRV-900/950 is asking for trouble. And I am primarily a candid shooter.
But still, I may wind up with a Sony HVR-V1U if I give up on the small-size feature-retarded preference over a-little-larger full-featured reality I must have to get all jobs done. Maybe one needs both to do different jobs at different times or the HC7 winds up being the B-Roll for the V1U main tent work. But I am 100% certain it would not be any of the Canon Pro options because they all lack HDMI out. Yes the HV20 has HDMI while all the other Canon camcorders do not. Crazy. Oh all the Canon the pro models DO have LANC ports. Go figure.
The CamcorderInfo.com review is full of contradictions and conflicted opinions. I sure wish we could all get an audience with the engineers in Tokyo. Seems like they come up with changes for the sake of changes lately - particularly in the case of the little focus knob instead of the traditional wheel on the lens barrel. That's particularly weird I know.
You know the fact is I am currently leaning toward also buying a HV20 just so I can use it as a deck for my HC7. HV20 is also an analog to digital converter which the HC7 is NOT. That is, it can receive your old analog VHS and 8/Hi8 analog playback and record them on DV tape OR even pass the digital converted signal on to another digital recorder instead. So if you will want to do that, that's another point for wanting the HV20.
And who can forget HV20 will sell for $300 less list ($1,099 in April) which means it will start at street below what the HC7 street will be by then - definitely below $1,000. Could start at $900 or less on day one.
One unique feature the HC7 has no other camcorder in its class has is the ability record in 3 second bursts of high speed so upon playback you get 12 seconds of slow motion. So if you'd like to be able to shoot golf or tennis swings or a horse running that will playback in slow motion, the HC7 is definitley the choice for you. I am certain the HV20 cannot do this.
Oh now or May? That's a personal call only you can make. I don't see how anyone here could tell you what to do. Do you really? I think both cameras are excellent. I have known about the HV20 since January 31st. But as soon as I saw it has no LANC port I put it out of contention. Now that's just me. Everyone says that is a feature few ever use. So fine. In that case I think anyone who is not convinced HC7 is great and doesn't care about remote zoom control should wait and see. I am not really a Canon guy. I own the XL1 and I don't like it. So I am very partial to tiny. And if the HC7 is nothing else it is definitely tiny. Oh I know the Canon HV10 is tiniest. But it not only also has no LANC port, it doesn't have HDMI Out either which the HV20 does have. So while I love tiny, that's within a certain minimum feature set I want:
- 1080i
- HDMI Out
- LANC Port
- Manual Audio Gain-External Input
- Top Loader
- Best In Class Sensor(s) Preferably 3 but so far that ain't happening this year.
- FireWire i/o
- Mac Editing Software Support - so far only HDV support not AVCHD yet.
- Best in Class Codec - AVCHD Codecs are all gonna suck compared to HDV and DVCPro HD.