A 13.1" screen @ 1920x1080? Wow. Thats got to hurt your eyes.
Specs outside of that are very impressive.
Windows has a feature called resolution independence. It allows for you to scale the UI.
A 13.1" screen @ 1920x1080? Wow. Thats got to hurt your eyes.
Specs outside of that are very impressive.
Spec's aside ... Price aside .... how is each computer to use day to day, I've owned both and can provide some input.
The Sony screen is incredible, viewing movies, photo's it's hard to beat *but* that's what TV's and external monitors are for ... I work on my computer an with resolutions like that on a 13'1" screen you get eye strain from reading fonts so small. Whether you eyes are good or bad, to read fonts that small from that distance for long periods of time is not good for anyone's eyes. There's a lot of info on the topic, (google).
Past the resolution you have the squatty 13'1" screen, again good for movies horrible for scrolling through documents, yes it's a noticeable difference to a 13'3" screen.
For a typing experience Sony's chiclet keys to Apple .... Mac's are much better to type on the keys are more round and indented with just the right amount of travel. Sony's keys seem to have sharp edges, corners, you'll notice they seem sharp after typing long periods.
The heat on the Sony is a problem, I'm not saying it isn't with Mac's either but these super high spec's create heat, the MBA's lower spec's save heat .... for a notebook that size full power isn't important to me, it's not often why they're sold, convenience and usability are the primary reasons and super hot noisy ultra-portables are no fun to use.
Use a Sony Z for a month and a MacBook Air for a month, I'd bet 9 out of 10 would choose the Air.
You have not owned this version of the z as its only up for pre-order, so quit bsing.
Fasailmac said:The MBA is a piece of trash when compared to the Z
You have not owned this version of the z as its only up for pre-order, so quit bsing. The MBA is a piece of trash when compared to the Z, the thing can barely run 1080p video and even with its limited cpu power it gets crappy battery life.
Spec's aside ... Price aside .... how is each computer to use day to day, I've owned both and can provide some input.
The Sony screen is incredible, viewing movies, photo's it's hard to beat *but* that's what TV's and external monitors are for ... I work on my computer an with resolutions like that on a 13'1" screen you get eye strain from reading fonts so small. Whether you eyes are good or bad, to read fonts that small from that distance for long periods of time is not good for anyone's eyes. There's a lot of info on the topic, (google).
Past the resolution you have the squatty 13'1" screen, again good for movies horrible for scrolling through documents, yes it's a noticeable difference to a 13'3" screen.
For a typing experience Sony's chiclet keys to Apple .... Mac's are much better to type on the keys are more round and indented with just the right amount of travel. Sony's keys seem to have sharp edges, corners, you'll notice they seem sharp after typing long periods.
The heat on the Sony is a problem, I'm not saying it isn't with Mac's either but these super high spec's create heat, the MBA's lower spec's save heat .... for a notebook that size full power isn't important to me, it's not often why they're sold, convenience and usability are the primary reasons and super hot noisy ultra-portables are no fun to use.
Use a Sony Z for a month and a MacBook Air for a month, I'd bet 9 out of 10 would choose the Air.
I like how people think usb3 and light peak are coming out soon.
2) OS. Enhancing their current OS with updates (with Win 7, there's barely much distinction in quality anymore, both have positives over the other
You can go to a store and get USB3 computers and peripherals today...
Thanks for the details Jeeg, much appreciated.Some facts about the new Vaio Z:
- the engineers decided not to add USB3.0 because of the extra space and weight required for additional chip.
- the Vaio Z does not have nVidia Optimus, its been confirmed in multiple Japanese reviews.
- the i7 620M model can get hot under full load, but the i5 540M model is just fine, slightly warm.
- the screen has 96% Adobe coverage if you choose 1080P, all models are a mix of glossy and matte with anti-glare properties.
- You would get 6 hours battery in Stamina mode (IGP) and around 2 hours battery in Speed mode (GT330M).
- the new Vaio Z ships March 6th in Japan.
Oh and 1080P in a 13.1" is not going to hurt your eyes if you turn up the DPI scaling to around 125%.
If only Sony offered Vaio Z with OSX instead of Windows huh.
Puuuuuuuure opinion. I dual boot Snow Leopard and Win7. Win7 only has one purpose: to play computer games that are either better than or don't have an Xbox port. For lots of casual users, they may feel different. For me, I would never work on a non-UNIX system.
Everyone is kidding themselves if they thing macs will get it soon. Apple is always behind in hardware.
True it is only my opinion, I'm with you that I still prefer Mac OS Vs MS though there isn't the chasm there was previously with Vista (again imo, take that as impliedPuuuuuuuure opinion. I dual boot Snow Leopard and Win7. Win7 only has one purpose: to play computer games that are either better than or don't have an Xbox port. For lots of casual users, they may feel different. For me, I would never work on a non-UNIX system.
Oh yeah, if you're referring to the Apple stuff then yeah. I would be shocked if Apple had USB3 in the new laptops. Shocked in a good way, but still...
the z does have optimus graphics switching, confirmed by cnets review
http://reviews.cnet.com/laptops/sony-vaio-vpcz116gx-s/4505-3121_7-33976156.html?tag=txt;page
Watch the video again guy. Listen to his comments at then end about the laptop not having Optimus and how he believes the next refresh should. The Z does not use Optimus. There is a physical switch that changes graphics on the fly. Optimus is a software that automatically switches according to the program you are using.
Why? What does a "UNIX system" allow you to do that Windows does not, unless you're a terminal addict?
All Unix lovers are terminal addicts. Hence if you see "Unix" cited, you're talking to one.
And aside from Xenix, a Unix system allows you to run an OS that wasn't made and isn't sold by a company that has a bad habit of abusing it's monopoly position in order to stiffle innovation and lock-in users.
Not choosing Microsoft doesn't have to be about purely technical merit.