You don't NEED a damn computer.Eidorian, I don't even know what Light Peak is? . I just don't NEED the latest and greatest technology and most people here don't either, they just WANT it.
You don't NEED a damn computer.Eidorian, I don't even know what Light Peak is? . I just don't NEED the latest and greatest technology and most people here don't either, they just WANT it.
What exactly is stifling about the iPhone ?
With all the innovation going on in the cellphone market, you'd be hard pressed to find any stifling there... And where's the lock-in ? Which data can only be accessed by the iPhone ?
And which court in which case declared Apple guilty... of what exactly ?
No, seriously, try again.
for 1899... which I admit is far more than the 1499 for the 13 inch high end macbook pro, but it's less than the lowest end 15 inch one with a seperate graphics card. Downright affordable in that light. Granted it doesn't run mac os....
Do you remember how much USB 1.1 sucked when USB 2.0 got going?
Buying a computer now without USB 3.0, especially one you plan to keep for two or three years, is going to set you up for that same kind of suck.
USB 3.0 peripherals are shipping right now. It's downright foolish to think that they won't be everywhere within two years.
Yeah for that price, it better be stacked, but pound for pound, if rather buy a MacBook pro, spend half that price and buy the following model MacBook pro with the money I didn't spend with the first purchase....
Just a bit of a side note... I checked out the base config... It's certainly not bad at 1899.... the 4500$ is the limited edition one... Sorta in the same realm as the overpriced 6000$ stealth macbook pro
Intel® Core™ i5-540M processor (2.53GHz) with Turbo Boost up to 3.06GHz
Genuine Windows® 7 Home Premium 64-bit
Silver
13.1" display with scratch-resistant technology and 1600x900 resolution
128GB (128GBx1) Solid State Drive with RAID 0 Technology
NVIDIA® GeForce® GT 330M GPU (1GB VRAM) with Intel® Graphics Media Accelerator HD
4GB (4GBx1) DDR3-SDRAM-1066
CD/DVD Burner
for 1899... which I admit is far more than the 1499 for the 13 inch high end macbook pro, but it's less than the lowest end 15 inch one with a seperate graphics card. Downright affordable in that light. Granted it doesn't run mac os....
Why is everyone comparing this to a MBA? The Sony Z is 1.3" thick, more than 1/3 thicker than the thickest MBP.
There hardly, if any, portables/laptops out there that are the size of the MacBook Air. Comparisons are still valid based on size as well as weight - it all falls into one category. Also consider the question "how portable is it relative to..." depending on person.
Because both fall into ultra-portable category. Portability mostly depends on screen size and weight (nobody really uses manila envelopes for carrying the laptops ) and these two are very comparable (except for specs)Why is everyone comparing this to a MBA? The Sony Z is 1.3" thick, more than 1/3 thicker than the thickest MBP.
For me, thickness is more important than weight as far as portability goes. A pillow may be light but it's sure as hell not that portable. The Adamo XPS is a better competitor to the MBA than the Vaio Z
Did you ever try to carry 8 lbs laptop? I bet you'd change your opinion.
Apple had better step up; the Z is new benchmark for all other ultralights. If Apple fails on their new versions, 13" MBP or MBA, it will be easy for me to choose the Z; I have a 15" MBP that will serve well as a desktop replacement; but the Z will be with me at all times.
And I am ready to buy.
What exactly is stifling about the iPhone ? With all the innovation going on in the cellphone market, you'd be hard pressed to find any stifling there... And where's the lock-in ? Which data can only be accessed by the iPhone ?
And which court in which case declared Apple guilty... of what exactly ?
No, seriously, try again.
We've been talking about this new behemoth from Sony in the Macbook Air forums as it's the same weight as an MBA (it's a premium ultraportable!) but the specs on it are so phenomenal that it'll surely take some beating even from an MBP update.
Sony 2010 Vaio Z Series
Top spec:
Design: Aluminium + Carbon Fiber
Weight: 3.07lbs or 3.3lbs (depending on which Sony website you visit)
Screen: 13.1", 1920 x 1080 Resolution
CPU: Core i7-620M. 2.66GHz, 3.33GHz Turbo. 35W TDP. 4MB L2 Cache
RAM: 8GB DDR3
SDD: 512GB (Raid 0 available)
Graphics: Nvidia 330M GT 1GB GDDR3 and Intel HD integrated - switchable
Battery: Sony: 6 Hours
Optical Drive: Blu-Ray/DVD/CD Burner
Other: x3 USB2.0, x1 HDMI Out, VGA Out, 802.11 a/b/g/n, GB Ethernet, 2.1 Bluetooth, webcam, mic, SD, Expresscard, Memstick
Not surprisingly the thing's almost insanely expensive at $4500+
With that repertoire, it's going to take quite a lot from Apple for me to go with them in my next update. Remember, and I say this again because of how astonishing it is, the Vaio Z is almost the same weight as the MBA (MBA is 3.0lbs) despite having x2 SSDs, an optical drive and discrete graphics!
I'm not going to pull the trigger yet though. It's a no-brainer to wait to see Apple's hand. They have a few avenues to potentially make me go for them instead for my next notebook:
1) Their multitouch trackpad is king
2) OS. Enhancing their current OS with updates (with Win 7, there's barely much distinction in quality anymore, both have positives over the other)
3) Cooling. It remains to be seen how much of a heat/noise monster the Vaio Z is. If it's unusably hot and loud, it's out. This is one of my main concerns with this as the CPU is 35W TDP.
4) USB3/Light Peak. Sony have only included USB2.0 in the Vaio Z. USB 3.0/light peak would have a huge bearing on my decision.
5) Design. If they produce something out of this earth design-wise (as the MBA almost is), then I'll shamelessly go for Apple. Design means a lot and there's not a better design in existence at the moment than the sensational-looking Air (Sony's new Vaio X is a second imo).
6) Improved IGP/Discrete interface. Eg as recent threads in the main news forum suggest Apple are looking into and may be one of the main factors for the delay.
7) OLED. With latest technology to minimize panel degradation.
8) Some other as yet unknown X-Factor. Remember, this is Apple Though in saying that, I have to say the iPad had no X-factor for me at all.
I can't imagine any company trumping the processor, RAM nor SSD that Sony have selected at this stage. With Apple's history of not incorporating bleeding-edge tech even in their flagship notebooks (the Macbook Air is a stunning exception), I'm not massively optimistic, nevertheless I can't wait to see how Apple respond especially with Steve Jobs recent quote:
"New Macs for 2010 are going to take Apple to the next level"
Despite the Arrandale Apple notebook delays (I'm religiously following the Arrandale thread with all of you), maybe the delay signifies something. Maybe we're in for a treat
Why do some of you guys care so much about USB 3.0? It's not like there are an abundance of products that use that technology as of yet.
Has anyone else noticed that this has the same major downside that the original Unibody MacBook had? No FireWire. For $4500, you could almost buy the 2.8GHz 15" MBP, which outspecs it in every way apart from i7 & Blu-Ray.
There hardly, if any, portables/laptops out there that are the size of the MacBook Air. Comparisons are still valid based on size as well as weight - it all falls into one category.
Personally I would never say a 13" screen is superior to a 15", the 2" size difference would also explain the weight, I agree on the graphics, and the MBP does have an option for SSDs. It also has FireWire, an option for a matte screen & a far superior trackpad.I'm guessing a hefty amount of the $4500 price tag is due to the "Signature Collection" bit, dual SSD and blu-ray drive.
The Vaio Z outspecs it in practically every way. Superior CPU, superior graphics, superior screen, option for SSD drives, far better implementation of switching hybrid graphics, and it's 2 pounds lighter.
Personally I would never say a 13" screen is superior to a 15", the 2" size difference would also explain the weight, I agree on the graphics, and the MBP does have an option for SSDs. It also has FireWire, an option for a matte screen & a far superior trackpad.
I'm not saying the MBP out specs it in every way, but the Sony does seem to have allot missing that a high end laptop should have, although if I was going to buy a PC & money wasn't an issue, I would still definitely buy this or an Alienware m15x, another laptop with similar specs that is far cheaper, although if I ever got the Alienware I wouldn't be able to use it as a laptop... Taking it into public would be to embarrassing.But the SSD's can't be put in raid on a MBP. The performance is far greater than a MBP also in that area.
Trackpad is impossible to say unless you have used both. From experience OS X works better with gestures than Windows. But never tried a Sony Z so I can't comment on that.