Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

mutsaers-vr.nl

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jan 10, 2008
347
4
The Netherlands
Can anyone give an estimate how much faster a mac mini M1 16Gb will be compared to my iMac24 inch late 2009 with 3 GHz processor (duo core), 8Gb RAM and with GT130 NVIDIA graphics card ? I use my iMac only just 2k video editing in proves and 4:2:2/10 bit. At the moment rendering takes ages.
 
Can anyone give an estimate how much faster a mac mini M1 16Gb will be compared to my iMac24 inch late 2009 with 3 GHz processor (duo core), 8Gb RAM and with GT130 NVIDIA graphics card ? I use my iMac only just 2k video editing in proves and 4:2:2/10 bit. At the moment rendering takes ages.
I don't know but this guy has a lot of videos showing him using it for video editing so you probably could get an idea from this
 
You will be totally impressed by the difference for reference the Geekbench scores of the machines. But it is more than the processor capacity speed up you get, the interfaces for connecting the external pheripherials is so much faster too.



And the M1X version of the Mac mini is still far away ?
 
If the benchmarks are to be believed, the M1 mini would maul a 2009 iMac.

Seriously, the fact that Mactels are not in a crash/burn for resale values is for reasons I have no idea about now that the M1's continuously seem to trounce Intel Macs.
 
I went from 2015 12" MacBook (dual core, 250MB/sec SSD) to... Oct. 2020 Mini 15 6-core 16/512 2500MB/sec SSD. I did NOT want to be forced into Big Sur, 11.3 or later at earliest. Also my T7 1TB gets ~950MB/sec so that's good. I wanted something that trouble free and mature, not 1.0. And it uses 14GB and all 6 (no hyper-threading) cylinders, less strain and less heat. Very pleased. And running Windows better than even my Mac Pro was.
 
If you're using FCPX & if you want to do a test, download the BruceX benchmark https://blog.alex4d.com/2013/10/30/brucex-a-new-fcpx-benchmark/ and follow the instructions. I ran one at 1080p HD (changed the project to HD before export) for you & the result was 6.5 seconds, at standard settings it was 12 seconds. This is on an M1 Mini 16/256.

In real world use the difference will be night & day - your iMac is the same generation my backup Mac mini (2009, 8gb, 2.66 C2D Penryn, SSD - but obviously the graphics card in yours is far better) & my M1 mini 16gb absolutely trounces it in every way imaginable - 4k video editing is buttery smooth even with multiple colour corrections/filters so you'll have no issues with HD & export times will be rapid.

If Apple bring out a fix to the bluetooth issues (which are real, and annoying), then the M1 mini will feel like a mature product, not a Gen 1. I came from a 2018 Mini i7 with Vega 56 eGPU & the M1 is far far more reliable and smoother in use. Export times from FCPX were somewhat quicker on my i7, but that was because of the eGPU. That being said, the M1 mini will export far quicker than a 2018 intel mini using the inbuilt GPU.

And yes I can confirm that the Youtubers gushing over the editing capabilities and speed of the M1 are all correct!
 
  • Like
Reactions: IowaLynn
And the M1X version of the Mac mini is still far away ?
If I knew Apple plans I would be rich man. Who knows when they will get to it again, I would think after just about everything else has been updated some time next year. It makes no sense for them to back over old ground this soon.
 
Dude, I went from a 2016 MBP to a 2020 M1 MBP and the difference is noticeable on just every day tasks.
 
I went from 2015 12" MacBook (dual core, 250MB/sec SSD) to... Oct. 2020 Mini 15 6-core 16/512 2500MB/sec SSD. I did NOT want to be forced into Big Sur, 11.3 or later at earliest. Also my T7 1TB gets ~950MB/sec so that's good. I wanted something that trouble free and mature, not 1.0. And it uses 14GB and all 6 (no hyper-threading) cylinders, less strain and less heat. Very pleased. And running Windows better than even my Mac Pro was.
Running Windows via emulation?
 
Can anyone give an estimate how much faster a mac mini M1 16Gb will be compared to my iMac24 inch late 2009 with 3 GHz processor (duo core), 8Gb RAM and with GT130 NVIDIA graphics card ? I use my iMac only just 2k video editing in proves and 4:2:2/10 bit. At the moment rendering takes ages.
The M1 will annihilate your 2009 iMac in every way. Everything will feel MUCH faster and more snappy. You will notice how even small things have a perceivable lag on your 2009 machine but on the M1 it's instant.
 
Tortoise 🐢 and hare 🐇
Night 🌃 and day 😎
Fluid butter 🧈 vs hiccups
Instead of dual-core / 7 or 8 real(not H-T) cores
2500MV/sec vs 200
... for starters
 
If you are trying to justify buying one... if you've waited this long, you can wait a little longer.

The next M1 Macs are going to run circles around these current ones. These machines were intended to be be bare-bones entry level machines. If you consider your workload bare bones entry level, then get one. If you consider your workload worthy of more horsepower, I would wait until the real machines are introduced. They will be released this year so it's not like an eternity and you've managed to survive this long, a little longer isn't going to kill you.
 
M1 used existing form factor. Likely prototype, but very real. Capable of more than just entry level. Yes there will be other models - iMac and Mac Pro. And likely additional MacBook Pro offering.

No one can say with any certainty that they'll run circles. This year. Or early 2022 in the case of a Mac Pro.
 
As always in technology, if you can wait, there will be something better.
Can anyone give an estimate how much faster a mac mini M1 16Gb will be compared to my iMac24 inch late 2009 with 3 GHz processor (duo core), 8Gb RAM and with GT130 NVIDIA graphics card ? I use my iMac only just 2k video editing in proves and 4:2:2/10 bit. At the moment rendering takes ages.
This...
Tortoise 🐢 and hare 🐇
Night 🌃 and day 😎
Fluid butter 🧈 vs hiccups
Instead of dual-core / 7 or 8 real(not H-T) cores
2500MV/sec vs 200
... for starters
Especially if you use FCP or other Apple Silicon optimized software.

Most don't compare systems with that age difference. Although, these reviews, handling 4K and 8K footage, will show you what the M1 and very recent Mac models are capable of regarding video editing.
-------------------------
Native. Bootcamp. I don't think Parallels would be called emulation.
I think, @ronster22's confusion was because you stated your newer Mac as an "Oct. 2020 Mini 15 6-core" -- I assume, purchase date related and a mistype of "i5". Hence, probably didn't realize you were referring to an Intel-based 2018 model and presumed M1-based, which would be emulated x86 (Windows) versus virtualization provided by Intel CPUs. (I hope I didn't make that more confusing.)

EDIT: Fixed some grammar and redundant wording.
 
Last edited:
Nope. Oct 2020 Intel. It saw some improvement over the March 2020, which is when that model came out. i5 because it has 6 cores, and unlike i7 with hyper-threading the i5 runs cooler, less need for fans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ronster22
In March, Apple increased the standard/base configuration SSD capacities, nothing more. I don't know of any changes in Oct. 2020 on the Intel-based Mac mini -- nor is anything noted by MR. Essentially, the early 2020 Mac mini is a 2018 model a bit cheaper (because you're getting a free upgrade to the next SSD capacity tier).

Unless you have something to the contrary.

P.S. I’m not trying to belittle the 2018 version.
 
Last edited:
If I knew Apple plans I would be rich man. Who knows when they will get to it again, I would think after just about everything else has been updated some time next year. It makes no sense for them to back over old ground this soon.
I think we will see the M1X Mac mini later this year. The Mac mini, while top spec is still pretty powerful, is still an entry level system. The last system that will be replaced will be the Mac Pro, specifically the $50,000 variants.
 
I think we will see the M1X Mac mini later this year. The Mac mini, while top spec is still pretty powerful, is still an entry level system. The last system that will be replaced will be the Mac Pro, specifically the $50,000 variants.
When the M1 models launched, I presumed, the higher end -- M1x or whatever -- could come as soon as March of this year. However, with production yields still struggling for the M1, the high-end Mac mini, MBP, and possibly (some of the) iMac models may not get an M series upgrade until mid or late this year.
 
Next question. I am planning to use the mac mini M1 16Gb (if they do get available because here in The Netherlands you can not buy it anywhere) together with the ultrawide monitor LG 38WN95C. This is a 3840 * 1600 38 inch monitor with frequencyrate upto 120 Hz. On many youtube reviews they claim that a monitor (independent of brand)with such specs works on a mac mini M1 upto 120 and even 144 Hz. I asked AMAC a local dealer of Apple equipment if this is really the case and they tell me it is IMPOSSIBLE. Mac mini M1 only supports to max. 60 Hz. They included the spec (see attachment). How is this possible because the reviews indeed show frequencies upto 120 Hz !!!!!!!
 

Attachments

  • videoondersteuning mac mini M1.jpg
    videoondersteuning mac mini M1.jpg
    123.4 KB · Views: 174
Next question. I am planning to use the mac mini M1 16Gb (if they do get available because here in The Netherlands you can not buy it anywhere) together with the ultrawide monitor LG 38WN95C. This is a 3840 * 1600 38 inch monitor with frequencyrate upto 120 Hz. On many youtube reviews they claim that a monitor (independent of brand)with such specs works on a mac mini M1 upto 120 and even 144 Hz. I asked AMAC a local dealer of Apple equipment if this is really the case and they tell me it is IMPOSSIBLE. Mac mini M1 only supports to max. 60 Hz. They included the spec (see attachment). How is this possible because the reviews indeed show frequencies upto 120 Hz !!!!!!!
I will go with lies for page or video views, not the first time happening on the internet...
 
Next question. I am planning to use the mac mini M1 16Gb (if they do get available because here in The Netherlands you can not buy it anywhere) together with the ultrawide monitor LG 38WN95C. This is a 3840 * 1600 38 inch monitor with frequencyrate upto 120 Hz. On many youtube reviews they claim that a monitor (independent of brand)with such specs works on a mac mini M1 upto 120 and even 144 Hz. I asked AMAC a local dealer of Apple equipment if this is really the case and they tell me it is IMPOSSIBLE. Mac mini M1 only supports to max. 60 Hz. They included the spec (see attachment). How is this possible because the reviews indeed show frequencies upto 120 Hz !!!!!!!
There are a lot of threads here on M1 and monitor compatibilities, etc. However, here are some more relevant to your inquiry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IowaLynn
There are a lot of threads here on M1 and monitor compatibilities, etc. However, here are some more relevant to your inquiry.
But how can this be explained if the spec of the mac mini M1 is only 60 Hz (again see attachment) ???????
 

Attachments

  • videoondersteuning mac mini M1.jpg
    videoondersteuning mac mini M1.jpg
    123.4 KB · Views: 159
But how can this be explained if the spec of the mac mini M1 is only 60 Hz (again see attachment) ???????
My guess is because those specs state the maximum. For example, 4K at 60 Hz, then perhaps 2K (QHD) at 120 Hz, and probably full HD (1080p) at 240 Hz. That is, as the resolution decreases from the maximum capable, the refresh rate can be increased.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.