Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I’m surprised that they didn’t go one step further and force Apple to start allowing payment forms in app instead of launching the browser.
 
I would never leave the safety, reliability, security of the Walled Garden and have my various subscriptions and more importantly my financial information with a bunch of numerous 3rd parties. I’m under the strong belief that an overwhelming amount of people want the same thing that’s why we buy iPhones.
So you don’t buy anything online?
 
I would never leave the safety, reliability, security of the Walled Garden and have my various subscriptions and more importantly my financial information with a bunch of numerous 3rd parties. I’m under the strong belief that an overwhelming amount of people want the same thing that’s why we buy iPhones.
Why must your way be the only way?

Why not the MacOS model where you can buy outside the App Store?
 
I would expect to see a verified by Apple logo appear on apps, at a price of course. If you want consumer trust that an app does what it says it does - it has to cost.
I could see Apple putting some sort of ‘trusted’ badge on apps that use IAP and then I can see them back in court as devs who don’t use IAP say it’s unfair and scaring consumers.
 
Random guess. Need data to back that up. Otherwise, my guess of "most developers like Apple" is just as valid.

Well if you go by Marco Armet, who makes the overcast app and is a host on the extremely popular ATP podcast, a lot of developers are very unhappy with Apple. He has a pulse on the community better than most.
 
  • Love
Reactions: HighwaySnowman
a lot is not most.

100 developers is a lot. it's not most developers.

Play with words however you want. The developer community is not happy with happy, but you can continue to deny reality if you like.

..and payments and commissions are not the top complaint.
 
Last edited:
If only 6 people needed the button, this begs the question of why was Apple so against allowing Spotify to place a button on their app?
Because it was a joke about how most of the world doesn’t actually care.

If you want a serious answer though, they were against it because they want to collect service fees. The average consumer doesn’t care about that stuff at all, and in this specific unique situation of Spotify, they were all already signing up outside of the app anyways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mwhite
I wonder how much it costs Apple to service the millions of copies of their app from the app store?

Perhaps they should offer Epic and Spotify etc to use their own CDN for distribution...

This is my curiosity, too. These companies can't get a free ride off of Apple's back. There needs to be some compensation?

Or do they view it as their apps leading to more Apple hardware purchases?
 
To me it’s highly unlikely that iPhone users will leave the App Store anyway. We luv Apple products and the Walled Garden so why would we ever leave it? If iPhone users were interested in saving a few dollars we would be buying Samsung.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: HighwaySnowman
Considering that there are Spotify users in the Apple ecosystem than Apple Music users, I would say the majority are fine paying outside of the App Store. Additionally, I would prefer the security of download my banking apps from my bank directly, not from Apple, since they seem to have a difficult time keeping fakes off the app store.

Personally, I have a iPhone in spite of the walled garden.

Yikes, that opens a can of worms.... your bank might be trustworthy, but if any "company" was allowed to distribute their own apps directly, you're going to see a LOT more malice than was delivered through the App Store.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: HighwaySnowman
This is my curiosity, too. These companies can't get a free ride off of Apple's back. There needs to be some compensation?

Or do they view it as their apps leading to more Apple hardware purchases?

Free ride? It's my phone it's being installed on. I paid for it, I pay for the cell service, the internet, the electricity to charge it.

The only "free-ride" is the middleman between my and the companies I want do business with.
 
This is my curiosity, too. These companies can't get a free ride off of Apple's back. There needs to be some compensation?

Or do they view it as their apps leading to more Apple hardware purchases?
Tim Cook said the vast majority of apps in the App Store are free. Are Meta, Reddit, Uber getting a free ride?
 
Woohoo! More freedom for users worldwide! Apple’s compelled to switch up those App Store rules is great! Courts are speaking loud and clear: “Tim Apple is a greedy idiot!” 🎉🥂
I guess having your app in the App Store should be free and the advisement and the development tools to.
 
Wonder how and if this will effect GeForce now and xcloud native apps coming to the App Store as this was one of the main reasons they only allowed web clients before.
For Microsoft the issue was two fold. They went through the whole testing phase of their app, then Apple blocked it because Apple stated they couldn't allow it because of the age restrictions on each game (how video apps get approved is beyond me, but apparently thats highly different). Then once Apple removed this issue after losing a court case, Microsoft wasn't willing to restart the process because of the fees Apple would charge for a gamepass subscription.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: gusmula
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.