As an AAPL shareholder, I certainly do not feel that way.I'm excited to see the iPhone branch out to other carriers.
But then again, the more I think about it, the more I don't like the idea.
I feel the iPhone still has the unique, fresh feel to it.
When all major carriers get it, it's going to go from "You have an iPhone, sweet! let me see it!" to "Shocking, you have an iPhone too" and they're going to be littered everywhere.
Anyone else feel this way?![]()
I think the difference now is the carriers' control over devices has been drastically relaxed. VZ originally didn't allow WiFi, disabled GPS nav, among other things. All the carriers were exercised tight control in some fashion. Apple got AT&T to agree to a host of features that enhanced the appeal of the iPhone. Other carriers essentially had to follow suit or they would be left behind. Android at VZ is an example of how control has been relaxed over the years.
I believe the issue with VZ is over price. I suspect Apple would demand more for a CDMA version due to the higher costs associated with development. However, I don't think this would be an issue if CDMA wasn't nearing EOL. With a limited potential market coupled with a very short time horizon, the number of CDMA devices sold wouldn't be large enough to recapture the development and testing expenses, etc on the front-end. I think Apple rather wait until LTE or at least until a dual GSM/CDMA baseband is cost-effective.
Sure, an iPhone that did both CDMA and GSM would be technologically hard to pull off however I've heard that many phone manufacturers have made two versions of their phones to support the incompatible formats... Apple could have OWNED the smartphone market in the US but made a deal with the provider with the worst network. It didn't make sense. Although if it is true that Verizon was offered the iPhone (unlikely because of the obvious incompatibility with the rest of the world not running CDMA) then perhaps a lot of the problem is Verizon trying to dictate to Apple what they would allow...
Because the current mobile ecosystem didn't exist back then. The only phones Verizon sold had giant Verizon logos both on the phone and in 50 places in the interface and were customized to trick you into spending more money. Apple didn't want any of that so Verizon turned them away.
we want to open the Market on the iPhone so coming this fall the iPhone also goes live to Sprint Verizon and T-Mobile.
Lots of posts here, so someone may have realized this already....
The iPhone has always been released/updated in July. So everyone who bought one right when it went on sale (like me) is tied to an AT&T 2-year contract that expires during July. Naturally, I'd love to get the upcoming iPhone, since my AT&T contract will be expiring. But I'm also considering a shift to Verizon if that carrier is announced.
So if Verizon (and others) won't be coming on board until the fall, I'm in a dilemma. If I get the new iPhone right away, I'll be stuck with AT&T for another two years -- with the new higher ETF. If I decide to wait till the fall, I've got a few more months with my old iPhone. But will AT&T let me simply pay month-by-month, or will they want to lock me in again, even with my old iPhone? I can see them wanting to lock me in, to make sure I don't jump ship.
I'm excited to see the iPhone branch out to other carriers.
But then again, the more I think about it, the more I don't like the idea.
I feel the iPhone still has the unique, fresh feel to it.
When all major carriers get it, it's going to go from "You have an iPhone, sweet! let me see it!" to "Shocking, you have an iPhone too" and they're going to be littered everywhere.
Anyone else feel this way?![]()
Lots of posts here, so someone may have realized this already....
The iPhone has always been released/updated in July. So everyone who bought one right when it went on sale (like me) is tied to an AT&T 2-year contract that expires during July. Naturally, I'd love to get the upcoming iPhone, since my AT&T contract will be expiring. But I'm also considering a shift to Verizon if that carrier is announced.
So if Verizon (and others) won't be coming on board until the fall, I'm in a dilemma. If I get the new iPhone right away, I'll be stuck with AT&T for another two years -- with the new higher ETF. If I decide to wait till the fall, I've got a few more months with my old iPhone. But will AT&T let me simply pay month-by-month, or will they want to lock me in again, even with my old iPhone? I can see them wanting to lock me in, to make sure I don't jump ship.
No, they did stop by Sprint. Forsee(old CEO) talked to Jobs about it as Apple was going around to EVERY carrier pitching the iPhone. I think Sprint balked for the same reasons that Verizon did. I hate At&t for many reasons but i give them credit with the foresight to bank on the iPhone and change the game in many ways.
Why would Apple care what the ads said about ATT?
The Island of Misfit Toys painted the iPhone as a good device on a poor network.
please be true please be true please be true please be true please be true please be true please be true please be true please be true please be true please be true please be true please be true please be true please be true
Here in NYC Sprint is very good and AT&T is horrible. Every iPhone user I talk to say they drop several calls daily! thats just unacceptable. Meanwhile I can't remember the last drop call I had on sprint. So please bring the iPhone to Sprint so I can finally get a new iPhone
Precisely. Your thinking is logical. Unfortunately, Apple often behaves illogically, which would explain why Apple has not offered the iPhone through T-Mobile. Yeah, I know that T-Mobile uses the 1700 MHz band for 3G, but how hard is it to come up with a multi-band radio that includes that frequency, too?
I'm excited to see the iPhone branch out to other carriers.
But then again, the more I think about it, the more I don't like the idea.
I feel the iPhone still has the unique, fresh feel to it.
When all major carriers get it, it's going to go from "You have an iPhone, sweet! let me see it!" to "Shocking, you have an iPhone too" and they're going to be littered everywhere.
Anyone else feel this way?![]()
The other variable is the EVO. How long is Sprint putting that forward as their flagship phone? Only a month or so? Doubtful.
Personally, I am really indifferent to all these carriers. I never realized any quality differences between sprint and AT&T. Sometimes it just seems that all these differences are voiced mainly by whiney people who like to blow things out of proportion.
The lack of T-Mobile rumors is good news. The Verizon rumors have been numerous and some of them have been absolutely absurd.OK, so Verizon's almost certain to get the iPhone, and Sprint's possibly going to get it as well am I missing something? What about T-mobile! They already have a GSM network, though of course Apple would have to put a 1700MHz antenna in there, but that's trivial compared to a CDMA version. Why haven't there been any rumors of T-Mobile getting the iPhone?
I'm a T-Mobile customer, btw, so I'm especially interested in that possibility.
jW
Negative is negative, regardless. The ads were painting the user experience as a poor one and used the iPhone to illustrate it. If Verizon were hoping to get the iPhone on their network, it was a dumb move to use the iPhone in their ads in that way. They could have made their point about AT&T's network without using the iPhone.
No, but then again I'm not an elitist jerk.
While this might give Apple a lot more customers, I think it will take a little bit of the "wow" factor that iPhone has gained sice it has been exclusive to AT&T. iPhone is seen as a high-end smart phone like most of Apple's products and when it is opened up too everyone that high-end factor could go away.
I think they could co-exist. I doubt that Apple would build in support for 4g on the new iPhone, and even if they did, I just see them as two different phones. I guess the "I hate everything Apple" crowd would still have their device.![]()