Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The games I’ll pay $70 are few and far between. So far 1, Starfield and I’m glad I played it for the exposure and experience, yet disappointed in it. The stellar games I repeat play, and I have no urge to return to it. That’s all I’ll say here, As I said plenty in the Starfield thread. 😉
Same ... I did pay $70 for Avowed in February because I like to support Obsidian, but Starfield I bought along with Redfall and something else for a total of ~$60. At this point it is incredibly rare I will pay full price for a game - I think BG3 in 2023 was the last time I did.

I will never pay $70 for a game. There are so many good titles on the market for a fraction such as the recently released Clair Obscur: Expedition 33. Produced by a small team of passionate developers that is completely embarrassing AAA priced at just $50.
Clair Obscur is a great example ... and I only paid $40 (there was a 20% off sale this week). But even though I am not a huge fan of the 'JRPG meets Souls-like' combat, the narrative design, graphics, world building and voice acting are all astoundingly good (love hearing Jennifer English aka Shadowheart again).

Similar is Blue Prince which is another highly regarded indie game that I would more quickly pay $30 at full price than something like Dragon Age Veilguard currently on sale for $30 (50% off).
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Huntn and Queen6
Same ... I did pay $70 for Avowed in February because I like to support Obsidian, but Starfield I bought along with Redfall and something else for a total of ~$60. At this point it is incredibly rare I will pay full price for a game - I think BG3 in 2023 was the last time I did.


Clair Obscur is a great example ... and I only paid $40 (there was a 20% off sale this week). But even though I am not a huge fan of the 'JRPG meets Souls-like' combat, the narrative design, graphics, world building and voice acting are all astoundingly good (love hearing Jennifer English aka Shadowheart again).

Similar is Blue Prince which is another highly regarded indie game that I would more quickly pay $30 at full price than something like Dragon Age Veilguard currently on sale for $30 (50% off).
The only way is to boycott studios & publishers who have predatory & anti-consumer practises and produce subpar games. Thankfully there are still some fair studios in the AAA space and they will prosper over the garbage...

Games at full price need to be complete on release, not broken, no microtransactions, loot boxes etc. DLC's should be substancial or free nor mandatory to complete the main game. The likes of Witcher 3 & BG3 are so very popular for good reason... Those that produce good content should be rewarded.

Wouldn't play Dragon Age: Veilguard if I was paid to. Absolute travesty, Dragon Age was a franchise you could print money with. Today we will be lucky to ever seen another due to sheer incompetence and devs making games for themselves not the players.

Pays to have a critical eye on films, games & general programming Support what's good and disregard the rubbish or you will only get more garbage. Can only suggest that the decision makers are incompetent due to falling up. How Sony ever thought for one second Concorde would be a smash hit and the circus called Disney expected Snow White 2025 to be a massive hit. I remember Ubisoft was bragging how Star Wars Outlaws was going to blow up and be the next "big thing" in gaming.
1746549663789.png
Clearly on the money... Far too many in the entertainment industry need to have a reality check... Same apllies to access media, which should be dismantled in the gaming space is just a cabal between them studios & publishers. Just paid for reviews giving glowing reviews to mediocre content by journalist's who likely cant or dont even compete the games or are blatantly lying.

Q-6
 
Last edited:
It didn't help that the game wasn't on the Steam store for the first 6 months of it's release. I guess Epic paid Ubisoft for exclusivity.

Ubisoft+ also skews the numbers some.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howard2k and Queen6
The only way is to boycott studios & publishers who have predatory & anti-consumer practises and produce subpar games. Thankfully there are still some fair studios in the AAA space and they will prosper over the garbage...

Games at full price need to be complete on release, not broken, no microtransactions, loot boxes etc. DLC's should be substancial or free nor mandatory to complete the main game. The likes of Witcher 3 & BG3 are so very popular for good reason... Those that produce good content should be rewarded.

Wouldn't play Dragon Age: Veilguard if I was paid to. Absolute travesty, Dragon Age was a franchise you could print money with. Today we will be lucky to ever seen another due to sheer incompetence and devs making games for themselves not the players.

Pays to have a critical eye on films, games & general programming Support what's good and disregard the rubbish or you will only get more garbage. Can only suggest that the decision makers are incompetent due to falling up. How Sony ever thought for one second Concorde would be a smash hit and the circus called Disney expected Snow White 2025 to be a massive hit. I remember Ubisoft was bragging how Star Wars Outlaws was going to blow up and be the next "big thing" in gaming.
View attachment 2508533
Clearly on the money... Far too many in the entertainment industry need to have a reality check... Same apllies to access media, which should be dismantled in the gaming space is just a cabal between them studios & publishers. Just paid for reviews giving glowing to mediocre content by journalist's who likely cant or dont even compete the games or are blatantly lying.

Q-6


The Steam release was much later than the Ubisoft direct release, but tragic numbers all the same.

And I agree. I don't pay full price for games, generally. Outlaws I did, as a rare exception (lol) but Shadows I waited for discounts. You get a patched game and pay less for it. It's literally win/win.

Also agree about Dragon Age. I loved the first games but was incredibly disappointed with this one. I actually didn't play it but do have a free copy via PS+. I'm just not interested in the "politics".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huntn and Queen6
The game is back on sale $35,ma patch game out, and I found someone who told me the problem I was having with the grapple hook in the demo is that I was not high enough. And, there is a climbable wall nearby that gets you high enough, and the grapple icon turns into a big "E" to deploy your grapple. So I was happy about that. Running around Tatooine is great, however, I read this review:


I might wait for it to drop some more. 🤔
The critique is that the jobs get repetitive, with the same tools, and one example, you sneak into Jabba's palace and your reward is a paint job for your speeder or something along those lines. Hmmm.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Howard2k
The critique is that the jobs get repetitive, with the same tools, and one example, you sneak into Jabba's palace and your reward is a paint job for your speeder or something along those lines. Hmmm.

Yes, I'd critique Shadows a similar way. I loved both games, but both games I felt like the economy lacked depth. Either you waste your money on silly cosmetics, or... I just didn't feel like they got the economic balance right on either game. The entire economy, meaning valuation of commodities too.

Again, I really enjoyed both games, but it felt in both games that if you did the side quests the economics were overly favourable to the point where currency was somewhat irrelevant.

But to be fair, perhaps that was intentional and they didn't intend that people did so many side quests without buying cosmetics. I just found I ended up with a mountain of resources in both games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huntn
Yes, I'd critique Shadows a similar way. I loved both games, but both games I felt like the economy lacked depth. Either you waste your money on silly cosmetics, or... I just didn't feel like they got the economic balance right on either game. The entire economy, meaning valuation of commodities too.

Again, I really enjoyed both games, but it felt in both games that if you did the side quests the economics were overly favourable to the point where currency was somewhat irrelevant.

But to be fair, perhaps that was intentional and they didn't intend that people did so many side quests without buying cosmetics. I just found I ended up with a mountain of resources in both games.
The thing is I’ve spent close to 1000 hrs (multiple playthoughs and content mods) in Fallout 4 crawling though building after building, shooting adversaries that pop out predictably and being content doing that, so I should not be harsh with SWO, but would prefer something more than a cosmetic item, if that is a regular kind of reward. 🤔

Yeah, another example, Cyberpunk 2077, overly generous with the income flow, you can sell guns you collect on the street for $700+ each, I usually end up with $1m+, and fastest car in the game is free, along with a convertible 911, and Jackie’s bike, although here, I usually do buy a desert roadster, and the fastest bike. …and I don’t mind. 😁
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Howard2k and Queen6
The thing is I’ve spent close to 1000 hrs (multiple playthoughs and content mods) in Fallout 4 crawling though building after building, shooting adversaries that pop out predictably and being content doing that, so I should not be harsh with SWO, but would prefer something more than a cosmetic item, if that is a regular kind of reward. 🤔

Yeah, another example, Cyberpunk 2077, overly generous with the income flow, you can sell guns you collect on the street for $700+ each, I usually end up with $1m+, and fastest car in the game is free, along with a convertible 911, and Jackie’s bike, although here, I usually do buy a desert roadster, and the fastest bike. …and I don’t mind. 😁
OK, you guys are gonna laugh, but I talked myself into getting Star Wars Outlaws because basically I’m in love with Star Wars. ☺️ … And so far I’m enjoying it. I might observe some of the elements are on the simplistic side like the manner of stealing a ship. And combat is on the easy side, I’m OK with that too because I’m enjoying the environment and mechanics of using my pet Nix to steal for me and distract people for me. And so far I’m in it more for the experience, story and environment, than for the challenge. But as I get acclimated, I might bump up the difficulty.
Now does the game have what it takes to hold my long-term interest? Honestly,that remains to be seen but so far so good.

Of note, $35 on sale is an acceptable price. $70-$120 (various versions) would be a solid no based on what I’ve seen, love it or not. 🤔 My impression is that the most expensive version includes two future DLCs, but to me that’s a huge gamble if you end up hating the game.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Howard2k and Queen6
I’m gonna use this opportunity to once again fawn about the brilliance of Cyberpunk 2077. The level of writing and staging in that game is phenomenal.

Now my goal is not to bad mouth, Star Wars Outlaws, but to highlight a difference. In SWO it’s “hey we want you to go do this job, you’ll make a lot of money” my answer “sounds good, let’s do it”. Proceed to job site to sneak in and get to the destination (sneaking, fighting required), grab the loot.

In contrast CP2077, “ there’s a guy who wants to talk to you about a job. You need to go meet him.” Arrive at limo get in the backseat and there’s a man. For a game, a fairly long discussion, about the heist, some of that while you’re driving around town. Then there’s the prep, talked to the people involved, get checked out on some gear, survey the target area, and acquire some different gear which involves some fighting. And then onto the job proper. This might sound like it drags, but let me assure you it does not. It’s all incredibly interesting and immersive.

And this is a future for video game storytelling and hopefully it becomes more of the norm, especially with the insertion of AI in Gaming. And I’m talking about the type of AI that facilitates how you communicate with other characters (npcs). 🤔
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Howard2k and Queen6
I’m gonna use this opportunity to once again fawn about the brilliance of Cyberpunk 2077. The level of writing and staging in that game is phenomenal.

Now my goal is not to bad mouth, Star Wars Outlaws, but to highlight a difference. In SWO it’s “hey we want you to go do this job, you’ll make a lot of money” my answer “sounds good, let’s do it”. Proceed to job site to sneak in and get to the destination (sneaking, fighting required), grab the loot.

In contrast CP2077, “ there’s a guy who wants to talk to you about a job. You need to go meet him.” Arrive at limo get in the backseat and there’s a man. For a game, a fairly long discussion, about the heist, some of that while you’re driving around town. Then there’s the prep, talked to the people involved, get checked out on some gear, survey the target area, and acquire some different gear which involves some fighting. And then onto the job proper. This might sound like it drags, but let me assure you it does not. It’s all incredibly interesting and immersive.

And this is a future for video game storytelling and hopefully it becomes more of the norm, especially with the insertion of AI in Gaming. And I’m talking about the type of AI that facilitates how you communicate with other characters. 🤔


CP2077 turned out to be such a masterpiece. All the more amazing given the shocking state that it was in at launch. Easily one of my all time favourites.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huntn and txa1265
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.