Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Fry is a second rate Oscar Wilde wannabe, with neither Wilde's rapacious wit nor his breath of creativity. The painting by the BBC of Fry and Laurie's more parochial half as the foremost thinking man's entertainer reflects the paucity of talent on the once public service channel. At least Jobs displays no false modesty, but the two figures share the ability to blow their own images out of all proportion matched only by their own inflated senses of self-worth.

It is no coincidence that two bright, Ozymandian figures should complement each other, though I preferred the Fry who spoke for the FSF - even if it was with only passing sincerity.

Pseuds corner comes to Macrumors.
 
Don't worry, we'll see Windows Tablet 7 Series soon enough. Holidays 2011. Watch for it.

The best thing about copycats is their predictability.

Absolutely true, but when you start with a Windows core, you've already gone wrong. But I'll bet a lot of money Microsoft won't get multitouch right all the way through the system. It will be a surface thing, but when you dig down it'll be same old Windows as before. It's not enough to bolt on a touch front-end and hope for the best.
 
Absolutely true, but when you start with a Windows core, you've already gone wrong. But I'll bet a lot of money Microsoft won't get multitouch right all the way through the system. It will be a surface thing, but when you dig down it'll be same old Windows as before. It's not enough to bolt on a touch front-end and hope for the best.

But lots of jazzy page transitions. Lots.

(I'm still bemused by the inexplicable hype and chatter over Windows 7 Phone Series - it looks like UI purgatory to me.)
 
While Fry's lengthy Time article offers little in the way of new information on the iPad, it does provide an interesting glimpse into the Apple mystique...

Hm. Sounds like TIME magazine is sticking to its winning formula.
 
I gotta say, I'm not digging Bizarro World April Fools' *LTD*. :p

Ah, that's why *LTD* is acting this way. Didn't think of the April 1 connection.

That said, he is correct. Apple couldn't compete with Microsoft so they made a conscious decision to go in a different direction. Instead of the boring beige boxes of the Apple 90s, they decided to compete on the high end consumer market. Let Microsoft have the race-to-the-bottom boring box market share in the business community, Apple would dominate the high-end consumer market.

And now they do.
 
Honestly, this Time piece dropped my interest several notches. The push looks way too authoritative. You think Time would have learned by now. My only take on this is that since Time's subscription rate has allegedly been dropping over the past ten years, this is an attempt to revive the magazine format.

My take is that this hype over down-loadable books, magazines and other ePub docs will not take much traction. The iPad has the Safari web browser and this allows you to hit any web site to read what ever you want. In addition, Safari has a great zoom feature to make the type any size you want.

I agree. I also think that implying meeting SJ is somehow better than PMs of the world and multiple Presidents is way over the top. Here is a guy who invents electronics and on the other hand are people that at the flip of a switch could destroy the entire world. Yeah, the electronics guy makes me so much more nervous. Whatever, get some real perspective.
 
Ironically, the vast majority of people are not using Apple products. Failed execution of the vision?

Fixed your quote. The vast majority of the population are not using Acer, HP, GM, Ford, Toyota, Sony, LG, or even Microsoft products either. Does that mean that they all have failed? No. The idea behind targeting the largest market is to gain the largest pool of potential buyers. If you do that, your product can be successful even if you only capture a small fraction of that market.
 
"One melancholy thought occurs as my fingers glide and flow over the surface of this astonishing object: Douglas Adams is not alive to see the closest thing to his Hitchhiker's Guide that humankind has yet devised."

loved that part

Sometimes I like to think of Stephen Fry as Douglas Adams representative on Earth. It's not difficult to imagine DA writing this article.
 
I would add that not only is it unfortunate that Douglas Adams is not here to see the HHGttG revealed but also Gene Roddenberry to see the PADD/Tricorder
 
I got that "magical" feeling when I first used my iPod touch. You're holding the device in your hand, you're using it directly with your fingers.

I had a weird feeling when using a mouse after using my iPod touch. I felt "disconnected" from the computer. I move a device with my hand to move a pointer on a screen, there's no "connection", similar to using a robotic arm to do daily tasks instead of using my own arms.

We don't think about it because we're used to mouses and cursors, but the disconnect is there nonetheless.
 
All that aside, there are only 4 paragraphs about Steve jobs, nothing which is really interesting or haven't heard before. The front cover and the online article just have images of Steve. I kind of expected more about him.

Ironically, the vast majority of people are not using Apple products. Failed execution of the vision?

Fixed your sentence structure there.

Fry is a second rate Oscar Wilde wannabe, with neither Wilde's rapacious wit nor his breath of creativity. The painting by the BBC of Fry and Laurie's more parochial half as the foremost thinking man's entertainer reflects the paucity of talent on the once public service channel. At least Jobs displays no false modesty, but the two figures share the ability to blow their own images out of all proportion matched only by their own inflated senses of self-worth.

It is no coincidence that two bright, Ozymandian figures should complement each other, though I preferred the Fry who spoke for the FSF - even if it was with only passing sincerity.

You do know Oscar Wilde use to molest children right?
 
I got that "magical" feeling when I first used my iPod touch. You're holding the device in your hand, you're using it directly with your fingers.

I had a weird feeling when using a mouse after using my iPod touch. I felt "disconnected" from the computer. I move a device with my hand to move a pointer on a screen, there's no "connection", similar to using a robotic arm to do daily tasks instead of using my own arms.

We don't think about it because we're used to mouses and cursors, but the disconnect is there nonetheless.


....alrighty then....
 
I really wouldn't say they or anybody else "blew it" 10 years ago.

People and technology just wasn't ready for it yet.

Apple realized it was ready now and jumped at it.

Disagree. See the comments made by many of the ex-Microsoft employees saying how Office was going to go touch for a tablet market but that the Office director resisted the idea.

Microsoft is a backwards company that doesn't make it's divisions talk to themselves. Hence you get half baked, half working stuff. Except the Entertainment division, to a point.
 
I would add that not only is it unfortunate that Douglas Adams is not here to see the HHGttG revealed but also Gene Roddenberry to see the PADD/Tricorder

I've thought the same thing. I think two apps I want to buy are a HHGttG app for my iPad and a PADD app.
 
I've thought the same thing. I think two apps I want to buy are a HHGttG app for my iPad and a PADD app.

I'm not planning on buying an iPad because I can't really see how I would use it. However, if someone makes a PADD UI App for it I will be at the Apple store within moments.

The same would happen if the BBC made a HHGttG App that talked. And a babelfish.
 
Hm. Sounds like TIME magazine is sticking to its winning formula.

In next week's issue, "A Million Ways Obama Loves You (And Me)" by Joe Klein, and "George Bush's Covert War on Kittens."

Journalism died long ago. It's all just entertainment now (on both sides of the political fence).
 
Ive's vision is triumphant. What Apple does, the market copies. We are using portable music devices that learned from the iPod. We are carrying smart phones that try to work like his iPhone. We use sleek desktops that rip off design ideas from the iMac. I'd say Ive executed his vision perfectly.

No doubt:D
 
Thomas Edison

After reading the Time piece and the Inhatko piece it really does strike me that Steve Jobs is the Thomas Edison of our time.

And I am sick with lust for the 3G iPad that I've already ordered. Why oh why am I a hopeless Apple Fanboy???:confused:
 
Microsoft is a backwards company that doesn't make it's divisions talk to themselves. Hence you get half baked, half working stuff. Except the Entertainment division, to a point.

It seems only half the Xbox 360s worked, so apparently your point extends to the Entertainment division as well. :p
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.