No he is the consumer, that is why the products work so well - the guy at the top cares how well they work, not how much they cost.
A Jobs-as-Jesus freak
No he is the consumer, that is why the products work so well - the guy at the top cares how well they work, not how much they cost.
Those of us who have supported Apple for decades and now think they're going down the wrong path will bloody well speak our minds, thank you very much.
I find it interesting that everyone comments on flash/silverlight being proprietary and no one talks about H.264 which is required along with HTML 5 to replace flash. This is a proprietary standard which just happens to be owned at least partially by Apple. If you want to argue about the proprietary issues then this has to at least be discussed. I am in the market to buy my first mac in the next month or so if they come out with an i5/i7 macbook pro but I'm not impressed when I see this kind of information and am considering rethinking a purchase. As a possible future purchaser and I own about 4-5 computers which I will eventually replace and possibly my phone as well, this kind of info about Apple doesn't impress me. Still strongly considering but they will really have to impress me with their GRAPHICS options as well as their chips. No ipad for me until they give an SD card slot (expandable storage), support for the current standards, real eInk, and multitasking (which I can do with my blackberry storm, and commonly flip between web, game, messages, applications).
No he is the consumer, that is why the products work so well - the guy at the top cares how well they work, not how much they cost.
Umm...Multitasking?
Flash support?
Removable battery?
Keyboard?
It's ADSL2+, I see I missed off the + in my original post, sorry about thatsoo according to this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymmetric_digital_subscriber_line
your line is not as you stated.
Ok also rarely does dsl ,meet the max speed stated in the wiki page due to many factors. The speed stated is the optimum speed that very few will see.
I'm referring to the iPad specifically, and wait and see. It will be an epic failure.
Right on. I miss Apple Computer.
Steve may have brought Apple back with the iMac but that was more than a decade ago. It's time for him to move aside and Apple to get someone who can do justice to its computer business.
It has nothing to do with stability, and everything to do with controlling the apps that can run on Apple devices.
Whether Steve and Apple want or not... Android is going to take over iPhone and its market
Google has released a mobile os which is very close to iPhone... it just needs a couple more years and that's it. iPhone era will be over.
Right on. I miss Apple Computer.
Steve may have brought Apple back with the iMac but that was more than a decade ago. It's time for him to move aside and Apple to get someone who can do justice to its computer business.
doesnt bill gates/microsoft own a large percentage of apples stock rendering the companys decisions somewhat limiting? somebody correct me on this, but ive had friends tell me microsoft owns a large chunk of apples stock so they cant do whatever they like.
either way though, no matter what apple is making, its peanuts compared to microsoft.
...I suspect the iPad is for everyone on the planet who is not currently (apple's) customer.
Who needs a tablet that runs the closed iPhone OS? Maybe not MR readers, but perhaps the millions of people for whom even OS X and Win 7 are still too complex.
I don't see how thats a good thing. Thats why we have all these restrictions. Because Steve wants it.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; en-us; Archos5 Build/Donut) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1)
Nexus One better? Say that to mine which is dead after 8 days of ownership.
I love the Android platform and the Nexus One hardware but I can't help but feel that htc and Google could have put a bit more testing in the device before rekeasing it. I've seen a few posts oline where other Nexus Ones have died in the same way. I just hope that it isn't a widespread problem.
The Apple/Google dynamic is turning out to be really fascinating. They are, more than any other companies, I think, the two that are going to shape the future of mainstream computing, so it's expected that they'll butt heads every now and then, I think. But there are also huge areas of cooperation between them, e.g. web standards.
Apple hasn't a had a serious rival in a while (the Microsoft stuff has been just formulaic for over a decade now). It will be interesting to see them in full fight mode.
A Jobs-as-Jesus freak
The restrictions are worth the sacrifice for me.
Small price to pay for such attentive quality control.
Also, flash crashing is more a problem on Apples side. Safari is the worst piece of crap when coming to Flash. I'm sure even Explorer does a better job.
doesnt bill gates/microsoft own a large percentage of apples stock rendering the companys decisions somewhat limiting? somebody correct me on this, but ive had friends tell me microsoft owns a large chunk of apples stock so they cant do whatever they like. either way though, no matter what apple is making, its peanuts compared to microsoft.
Uhm, so Apple is in a pissing match with both Adobe and Google.... Great....
As to Flash, sorry, but only a retard would purchase a web-browsing product without Flash support.