jxyama
macrumors 68040
Originally posted by hose this!
Umm, maybe if all you want is a $2000 word processor/web browser.
I work side by side with someone who uses a 867 MHz 15.2" TiBook. We use our laptops to do some pretty heavy lifting in Photoshop 7, Illustrator 10, and Acrobat. My laptop keep ups with his and in some apps, even makes it seem pokey. What's my laptop? A 3-year old 850MHz PIII Vaio running XP pro with 256 RAM. Oh, but I also have the disadvantage of having all those pixels in a 1400 x 1050 display.
Don't get me wrong - I would love to be the proud happy owner of a mac laptop, but c'mon $2000 is A LOT of money to spend on a laptop that isn't that much faster and has lower resolution than my 3yr old machine, even if it is lighter, has better battery life, and looks prettier.
while i can't say much in concrete terms, i find it hard to believe your p3 with 256 mb ram with xp pro wouldn't be "much" slower than 867 g4. there's a lot of room for subjective judgement there... i would think xp pro with just 256 mb would be quite sluggish, regardless of comparing to 867.
regardless, as i wrote before, i don't think there's much incentive for apple to let a g5 pb eat into the sales of g5 PM. just not yet. if apple were to dumb down the g5 in PB so it won't compete against the PM, then is there still a point to using g5 in a PB to begin with?
one of the advantages of g5 is expanded memory access. how many slots or $$$ would you need to take advantage of this when 512 mb SODIMM modules cost nearly $100 and a 1 gb, over $500? faster fsb is nice, for sure, but i really think it's a wishful thinking at this point.
instead of thinking "what's technically possible," we need to ask "what makes the best business sense for apple" because that's how apple (and any other business) operates.