Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I don't expect a sequel for this movie ever. But in ten years with a different generation, I wouldn't be surprised if there is another movie about Steve Jobs and Apple's rise.

My take is now that the serious dramas about Silicon Valley are done, it is time to bring out the rubber chicken and start some comedy scripts. The whole Atari story is begging for a screwball-style comedy movie.
 
Shame. It was a great film.
Yes and no. My view is everyone carried their weight except for Seth Rogen. His delivery was barely beyond reading cue-cards and I bet the actor budget was mostly spent on Mike and Kate. Seth probably took a SAG minimum just to get an acting credit.
 
Woz liked it.

Not that I think any of that matters. Someone may be against a movie out their own personal reasons/feelings (which is very understandable), but that doesn't necessarily reflect on the quality of the movie.

I think Mossberg had a relatively nuanced review. I will see the movie at some point for sure.
 
This is what I have been saying all along only to be attacked by the die hards.

For most people, they have seen the movie on Steve Job's life with the Ashton Kutcher movie and it is just too soon to see another one.
You pretty much nailed it. This was a very artsy movie that, IMO will have a cult following years from now.

Still want to see the Apple origin story done as a stoner comedy with Kevin Smith giving it a shot. Kevin would make a good Woz.
 
Mmm. . Wonder why it's bombing.. maybe because outside of this forum, no one gives 2 hoots about a salesman. ..
That or the Jobs estate didn't want this movie to happen and some very diabolic undercurrents started to screw up the promotions. Steve did have a board seat at Disney. This is purely speculative.
 
I went only because I had free passes. No matter what one thinks of the movie I'm not surprised it's a box office dud, Apple enthusiasts are likely to be the only ones interested. After all he was only God to a small group of Apple users.
 
Mmm. . Wonder why it's bombing.. maybe because outside of this forum, no one gives 2 hoots about a salesman. ..

Same reason why Android controls the market. People here believe one way but in reality it's something totally different outside of these forums. I use both Apple and Android so I can relate either way.
 
I'm happy it failed simply because it gives a fake version of what Steve truly was.

Sadly this film could have been great with a more honest account of Steve's life including his entire family and complete career.
 
This convinced me that I should follow my initial inclination to wait to watch it on Netflix or Redbox, if at all. The idea of Seth Rogen as the Woz is just so bizarre.


i went into the film with suppressed expectations.
found it interesting , engaging and entertaining.
thought it worked as a character study.
not really interested in rehashing details of the mans life.

people are going to have their own reactions one way or the other.
for one reason or another.
everybody's entitled to an opinion.

but regardless of the films intrinsic value or possible lack thereof, I think that these 'movie bitches' are just a couple of incredibly annoying, alcohol driven, empty headed twits.
 
This movie definitely captured Jobs' character. I'm 51 and have read about him through all of the magazine articles, books, and documentaries

You read about him? There are people who actually worked with him for several years who say Fassbender's characterization is a complete fiction, capturing nothing like the Steve they knew. Who do you think I believe more?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrxak
Should have had the film start later in Steve's life, i.e. post-2000. And the film should have been first iPod, iPhone, iPad. Then it could also have included Steve's death in the finale. That would have been current and modern products and tear-jerker final days of Steve's life. It would have been much more relatable to overwhelming majority of the population and a better storyline. And regardless of Fassenbender's acting chops, if it had better casting with lead played by actor with more actual likeness to Steve, i.e. paying Bale any amount it would have taken for him to sign on to the project, it would have been a blockbuster. Fassenbender does not resemble Steve; The product launches are, for the most part, ancient. So neither of those are relatable to audiences: subconsciously character-wise, visually tech-wise. It doesn't compute.
I haven't watched any of the Jobs movies, and have no interest in this one, either. But this is a sad commentary on the world today. Let me summarize:

"Nothing happened before I was born, that's all stupid. Narf!"

We truly deserve whatever bad happens to our society.
 
  • Like
Reactions: firewood
I just don't think that the audience for whom this film is made are numerous enough to make it successful at the box office.

It's not the Steve Jobs movie I want to see, no matter how well crafted it is. I don't think that the human interest story of his evolving relationship with his daughter is enough to sustain it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrxak
You read about him? There are people who actually worked with him for several years who say Fassbender's characterization is a complete fiction, capturing nothing like the Steve they knew. Who do you think I believe more?
There are people who worked with him that said Fassbender's characterization was spot-on as well.

Who do I believe?

Don't care. The film worked as a character study.
 
People who actually care about film as an art form.

I mean, it's critically-acclaimed and there is plenty of oscar-buzz surrounding this movie. I really don't understand the hatred here. The film has an 85% on Rotten Tomatoes.

I've rarely seen a critically-acclaimed film that I though was exceptional, and a lot that were just terrible. "critically-acclaimed" just means that it meets someone's idea of politically correct and they need an excuse for low attendance. If people actually liked the film, it would be a smash hit, no questions asked.
 
I've rarely seen a critically-acclaimed film that I though was exceptional, and a lot that were just terrible. "critically-acclaimed" just means that it meets someone's idea of politically correct and they need an excuse for low attendance. If people actually liked the film, it would be a smash hit, no questions asked.
This is dumb reasoning. How much a film makes and the quality of said film are not jointly connected.
 
It's just not the type of movie people would go to a theater and pay to see. Those days are gone. It'll do good on home video and/or Netflix.
 
This film wasn't supposed to be spot on accurate. It was meant as a dramatic representation of actual events and the players involved. In any event, I don't think it flopped because of any perceived inaccuracies. It flopped because the general public doesn't care, or maybe even doesn't know who Steve Jobs is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roessnakhan



As the first full weekend in theaters for Aaron Sorkin and Danny Boyle's Steve Jobs film comes to a close, early box office results have been disappointing, according to The Hollywood Reporter. Estimates put the film's take at $7.3 million from nearly 2,500 theaters, well below expectations and only good enough for seventh place on the weekend.

jobs-scene.jpg

Michael Fassbender as Steve Jobs and Seth Rogen as Steve Wozniak in 'Steve Jobs'
The film has generally received a positive reception from critics, particularly for Michael Fassbender's portrayal of Jobs. Those more familiar with Jobs' history and those closest to him have, however, been less satisfied with the film, in many cases taking issue with the way Jobs is portrayed and some of the artistic license that deviates significantly from actual events.

Article Link: 'Steve Jobs' Disappoints in First Full Weekend With 7th-Place Box Office Showing
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.