Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I decided after the initial release that there wasn't a compelling reason to see this in a theater.

I wonder if Apple will ever offer this on iTunes?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
Did anyone really want a Steve Jobs movie anyway? Maybe after 10 years it's time to revisit his legacy. But with all the attempts at a Steve Jobs film it seems like they're just trying to take advantage of the opportunity rather than genuinely being interested in an aspect of his life or career.

That's what it feels like to me anyway. I haven't seen any of the films so I can't comment on them in particular but I have no interest or desire to do so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kas23
The biggest problem was how they rolled out the film. Lots of people had heard about it many weeks ago, and wanted to see it, but it wasn't at their local theatre. Then when it finally was, the hype had already died. What a screw up, it was a good movie.

I completely agree with this! All of the prerelease buzz was for the Oct. 9 release date, and I remember even making plans to see it then.

Turns out it was only being released in NYC & LA. I remember being pretty pissed, because I had to peck and hunt around way too much to discover the real release date, as EVERYTHING promoting the film said 10/9. By the time the 23rd rolled around, everyone forgot about it because the date/weekend they expected to go see it passed with no sign of the movie. Someone at Universal deserves to be fired for bungling this so badly.
 
Movie studios need to get back into seeing things long term, with digital projection it shouldn't be that much more to keep the movie in cinemas. I guess I'm just annoyed because this no doubt will have a negative affect on the New Zealand release and will likely have a limited at best screening.

Distribution has nothing to do with it. You need butts in the seats to recoup production, marketing and distribution cost. Not to mention the exhibitors playing a movie to an empty auditorium. The exhibitors hardly make anything off of ticket sales the first couple of weeks as it is - the majority of that goes to the studio and distributor.
 
I'd like to have seen the same approach, i.e., backstage and presentation of Apple milestone products, but +more+ product covered and done as a mini-series on HBO. Instead of a three act movie, 5-7 episodes, each one the lead-up/backstage/unveiling, and with 6 or more, they could've done, Mac, iMac, Macbook, iPod, iPhone, maybe iPad?
 
The biggest problem was how they rolled out the film. Lots of people had heard about it many weeks ago, and wanted to see it, but it wasn't at their local theatre. Then when it finally was, the hype had already died. What a screw up, it was a good movie.

Not only that, but they insisted on sticking with the initial "R" rating. Like it or not, that cuts down your prospective audience quite a bit. Why do you all the big blockbuster super hero movies are PG-13? It's all about money. Danny Boyle shot himself on the foot with this one (in so many ways).
 
I think thats bitter! Two weeks and you pulled the movie from theaters because its not doing well as you expected. That's not good. Don't punish the people who haven't gotten around to seeing it yet, because their expectations weren't met. I'd fine with them pulling it if they release it on Netflix, DVD, etc right now. Legally, we have no way of viewing it now.

Sounds like you're bitter, not the movie studio

Are you new to the movie business? If a movie isn't doing well it gets pulled and replaced by either something new or it's slots are taken over by other movies that are doing well. Punish? This makes no sense. Theaters don't host movies for public benefit. They do it to make money. The movie wasn't making money. Take solace though. With the film being pulled, it will reach Netflix and DVD a lot sooner than it would have if it was a hit.

It's pretty simple to me. The movie had limited mass market appeal. Outside of tech circles, Jobs was basically just the "iPhone dude". The movie was well reviewed by critics and movie goers who actually went to see it. Unfortunately, not enough people wanted to see it. It happens to tons of well received movies. Steve Jobs being the subject matter made this movie no more special than any other.

Agreed.

There's no point of us going back and forth. I can only speak for myself and say I am disappointed they pulled the movie after two weeks. I am sure there are tons of people, including myself, who haven't gotten around to seeing it yet. I guess it's our fault we didn't have time to see it within the two weeks it was playing in theaters. I didn't expect them to pull it THIS quick. I guess we will have to wait on the DVD or something.

Well you sound more than disappointed. And the worst case scenario - you have to wait to see it. Why/how is that sooooo horrible?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zoboomafoo
A movie about a surly, narcissist CEO of a popular company didn't do well? I think they overestimated his social status and underestimated the intelligence of moviegoers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lowendlinux
I wouldn't pay for this. I'd barely want to pay for the Martian and that film KILLED it in the box office. Sad to say that Hollywood botched this one. Not enough of the right kind of hype and in the end that's all there really was to it . . . . hype. It just wasn't an appealing biopic.
 
Everyone in this thread is apparently a goddamn genius. These are the same guys who said the same things about the "Facebook movie" that went on to make $225 million dollars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dydegu and Gasu E.
Hindsight bias

Hindsight bias
, also known as the knew-it-all-along effect or creeping determinism, is the inclination, after an event has occurred, to see the event as having been predictable, despite there having been little or no objective basis for predicting it.[1][2] It is a multifaceted phenomenon that can affect different stages of designs, processes, contexts, and situations.[3] Hindsight bias may cause memory distortion, where the recollection and reconstruction of content can lead to false theoretical outcomes.
 
The market is so much saturated with information about SJ. Pretty much when majority of the population defines SJ it sums up to a smart and askwhole and that's all they need. Anything in between is irrelevant to a common people they only want to know your best and worst, it's a human nature. If they want this movie to become successful just bring it straight to Netflix. Right Now! :rolleyes:
 
perhaps they should have not done such a slow roll out I was all ready to see it on release date but it was not showing anywhere near me.... now ill just wait to rent it
 
Not a surprise.

Why would anyone, other than us Apple "fans", care about Steve Jobs, let alone a movie about his story?

I understand the man's impact in the world and Apple's current popularity but, as indicated by the box office (of all movies related to him), the general public still doesn't care.

Still, I want to see this (the trailers look really good).

"What do you do?" "I play the orchestra" Hahahaha. Brilliant. That sounds like everything I've read or seen about him.

Steve Jobs was the man.

All that said, I go to the movies for 1 reason only: spectacular visual effects. If a movie doesn't have 'em, I can wait for a home screening.

Saving Private Ryan, Titanic, 300, Avatar, LOTR, Jurassic Park, Finding Nemo, Star Wars, any Marvel/DC movie, Pirates of the Caribbean, the Matrix.

The small(er) screen just doesn't do these movies justice. I go to the theater to be AMAZED.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.