Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Not only that, but they insisted on sticking with the initial "R" rating. Like it or not, that cuts down your prospective audience quite a bit. Why do you all the big blockbuster super hero movies are PG-13? It's all about money. Danny Boyle shot himself on the foot with this one (in so many ways).

I'll be hated for saying this, but I believe that it flopped because of its R-rating.

This is silly. Blockbuster superhero movies water down for a PG-13 because they are appealing to millions of kids who wouldn't be able to see an R-rated film. Do you honestly think kids under 17 were dying to see the Steve Jobs biopic, but couldn't because it was R-rated, and that caused the movie to flop?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SDRLS
From my experience, reality was worse than the movie/story.
Remember, Jobs is an icon of near godly status to some fan boys. I doubted the movie would make them happy and reality would be less exciting for them.
 
(yes... a Sandler movie destroyed the Jobs movie... lol)

The tickets wouldn't have sold if it was the ONLY movie available. Lol

And I'm actually proud because I TOLD people I was purposely not buying tickets to these Steve Jobs movies.

Completely boring story. I don't know why they'd thought they'd be able to make money off of it.

How many times are they going to create these flops. Let's see if they make another one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tonyr6
I think thats bitter! Two weeks and you pulled the movie from theaters because its not doing well as you expected. That's not good. Don't punish the people who haven't gotten around to seeing it yet, because their expectations weren't met. I'd fine with them pulling it if they release it on Netflix, DVD, etc right now. Legally, we have no way of viewing it now.

It's business! It would be highly unusual for there to be a sudden surge in viewership after three weeks. Spectre and Peanuts were released. New movies come out, people who want to see them go see them. Make way for the new; this happens literally every week. You can still find it somewhere, most likely in smaller, maybe dollar theaters. But those too will disappear. If you want to watch it ... GO!
 
More of a streamer than a theatre-trip. Probably a good idea to get it on as many services as possible while the publicity is somewhat fresh and before the box office failure becomes the story.
 
There's no point of us going back and forth. I can only speak for myself and say I am disappointed they pulled the movie after two weeks. I am sure there are tons of people, including myself, who haven't gotten around to seeing it yet. I guess it's our fault we didn't have time to see it within the two weeks it was playing in theaters. I didn't expect them to pull it THIS quick. I guess we will have to wait on the DVD or something.

I think the point is, the entire movie industry has figured this out after a near century of operation. It sucks when you don't get around to seeing a film, for sure. But there aren't tons of people waiting to get around to it.
Certainly not enough for them to hold off showing other films that could make more money.
 
Honestly, isn't this like the third or fourth Steve Jobs movie in two years? Why are we so persistent?
 



The new Steve Jobs film faced another disappointing box office performance this past weekend, with the Danny Boyle-directed movie dropping more than 69 percent in profit from the previous weekend to a $823,000 weekend gross. Most surprising, however, is the movie's removal from 2,072 theaters across the country in one single weekend, after initially premiering in 2,411 just over three weeks ago (via Cult of Mac).

steve-jobs-film-800x460.jpg

When the film was in limited release and preparing to go wide on October 23, the projections for its debut box office weekend were between $15 and $19 million. According to Box Office Mojo, to date, the overall lifetime gross of Steve Jobs is just hitting the projections for its opening weekend: $16,684,073. In the two weeks the movie was in a limited run in Los Angeles and New York, it displayed impressive numbers, earning the fifteenth spot as the highest grossing per-theater average film in movie history.

Unfortunately, when Steve Jobs debuted wide, it earned only the 7th spot at the weekend box office with about a $7.3 million take in its first three days. The disappointment of the film's performance is in direct contradiction to a bevy of positive reviews, even ones that hinted at Oscar nominations for Michael Fassbender and Kate Winslet over a month before the movie released.

Currently, Steve Jobs sits at 85 percent on the review aggregator site Rotten Tomatoes, with a total of 156 positive reviews to 27 negative. With the holiday movie season kicking into gear after a slow October at the box office, it seems that Universal has ditched its initial plan of a word-of-mouth build-up for the movie. If Oscar talk continues for its stars, there's a possibility it could return to a few more theaters closer to the awards show.

Article Link: 'Steve Jobs' Movie Pulled From Over 2,000 Theaters After Flopping at Box Office
 
I get why we like apple products and a small tech enthusiast like Steve Jobs vision but I just don't get why this Hollywood cash grab happened? Like three movies right??? Come on. All of them flopped. Hope this is the last Steve Jobs cash grab.

I preferred the Walter Issacson book itself.
 
Sorry, what was inaccurate in the movie?

I mean, proven inaccuracies...not opinion.
 
The biggest problem was how they rolled out the film. Lots of people had heard about it many weeks ago, and wanted to see it, but it wasn't at their local theatre. Then when it finally was, the hype had already died. What a screw up, it was a good movie.
Yea - this looks like bad timing all around - the producers needed good reviews before the studios were confident to go into wide release but they lost the initial audience that would have gone sight unseen.
 
I thought it was tremendous. Amazing screenplay by Sorkin, unique construction (for a film, it was put together like a three-act play), acting uniformly fantastic. If Michael Fassbender doesn't get an Oscar there simply isn't any justice, and Kate Winslet and Rogan and Daniels were almost as good. It's a shame.
 
You can never completely tell if a film will be a success, you can do all the focus groups and test screening you like, its always somewhat of a gamble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueParadox
I'll rent it, when it comes out on iTunes
When it gets to netflix, and I have finished seeing every thing down to 1 star, it may be played while I do something useful (likely sleep). The subject matter does not warrant investing any money to play.
 
Film IS an art, just like music, literature, painting, sculpture, etc.. It's just the most expensive of arts ( well, excluding architecture maybe ), wich makes it more liable to be fiddled with by it's financeers, since the losses can be more dramatic than in other arts.

( Even Transformers or a McDonald's jingle is actually art, it's just very very bad art )

I think you are disagreeing with me on a semantics. Art meant to make money is different than Pablo in his studio doing paintings for the love of it...
 
I went to the movies yesterday. I had not seen the James Bond movie nor the Steve Jobs movie. What movie did I pick? I saw James Bond in IMAX because it's a movie that can take advantage of the big sound and big screen of the IMAX theater.

I can watch a non action movie (Steve Jobs) on my home TV and not feel like I'm missing out on the explosions etc. Plus I get to save a few bucks. I'll pick this movie up when it comes out for home release. Not going to spend $100 to see it in the theater!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.