Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What angering BS. I mean really, so now I can't use my slightly older camera? Please.

Also, what about HDD's that I am using a Firewire connection for because I've tied up my USB ports?

Face it Apple, you botched a lot things with this upgrade. That's 2 piss poor releases in a row: iPhone 3G and this.

The reality distortion field that surrounds Steve has finally included him in it effects.

Sorry Steve, but the news flash is that those new "HD" camcorders use an inferior CODEC (AVCHD) whether shooting as HD or SD. HDV and especially DVCPROHD are significantly better (and DVCPRO HD is easier to edit) than AVCHD, and DV is even more significantly better than AVCHD or MP1.

HDV, DVCPRO HD, and DV all need firewire for capture; and editing any of them (especially if they get converted to AIC, 100mbs) need faster, streaming hard drives: USB2 doesn't cut it.

So, I guess if I want to edit on an inexpensive laptop, I'll get Dell and Vegas.

Eddie O
 
Wow, P2, XDCAM. Certainly a MacBook consumer. :confused:

Point taken, but I did include the SD9, which is a great little thing and a proper consumemr cam. I used the higher end formats as other people were invoking DVX100's and the like.

The point I was making (badly), is that people are wrong to use video as the main reason for including FW on the MB. The audio guys have it far worse; I didn't chime in as audio is not my area.
 
The point I was making (badly), is that people are wrong to use video as the main reason for including FW on the MB. The audio guys have it far worse; I didn't chime in as audio is not my area.

It's not wrong. There are millions of consumers out there with perfectly good miniDV cameras. You can't say one group or the other is more important.
 
Yes the newest cameras are starting to use Flash Memory but this still doesn't solve the edit hard drive issue. I'm just glad I bought the previous generation Macbook because if Apple gets rid of Firewire they are killing the Mac as a low cost edit option. :mad:[/QUOTE said:
I own the Panasonic HVX200, which uses memory cards to record. It will not connect to a Mac to transfer the tapeless files through USB. You need firewire to connect it to a Mac. This is one of the most popular prosumer models on the market today.
 
well my external HDs still use it!

This is seriously a deal breaker for me!

Apple line up just isn't doing it for me currently.
 
The reality distortion field that surrounds Steve has finally included him in it effects.

Sorry Steve, but the news flash is that those new "HD" camcorders use an inferior CODEC (AVCHD) whether shooting as HD or SD. HDV and especially DVCPROHD are significantly better (and DVCPRO HD is easier to edit) than AVCHD, and DV is even more significantly better than AVCHD or MP1.

HDV, DVCPRO HD, and DV all need firewire for capture; and editing any of them (especially if they get converted to AIC, 100mbs) need faster, streaming hard drives: USB2 doesn't cut it.

So, I guess if I want to edit on an inexpensive laptop, I'll get Dell and Vegas.

Eddie O

Thanks for the concise desc of camcorders. But the fact is apple knew all that. Apple knows more about video/camcorder/formats than us. This whole 'video can be downloaded via usb' is just FUD. The real reason they dropped FW from macbook is to force people to buy MBP. Video story is just a lame excuse, bordering on a lie.

Never thought I'd accuse apple of spreading FUD...
 
So how the hell have I been able to cut, color and output material from macs without ever using firewire capture from camera. (I will admit that a FW800 card reader was used, as it was lying to hand). The current darling of the DV crowd, the HVX200 puts wonderful images onto P2 cards, so I can access that on a macbook (if I was using one) with a USB PCMICA reader. The new Sony XDCAM EX does the same, but on Ex34 cards, so again I can just use a USB again or slot it straight into a MBP. Shoot it on a SD9 then I can just use a SD reader, again with a reader or go straight to camera, both times with USB.

As an aside I do feel for those who went with the Canon HV30. Actually canon are getting worryingly behind in this field.

Those are at the top end price wise of the prosumer market and, as of yet, don't have a large percentage of the market. They are the exception, not the rule. Go to B7H Photo-Video (The largest online camera retailer) and under prosumer cameras you will see that every one of them uses firewire. Even the HD models. I wouldn't be trying to use that stuff on a MB, or even a MBP Those Sony and Panasoninc models require a workhorse desktop editing system, and I suspect you're aware of that. But even if those were what everyone was buying, there are still millions of DV firewire cameras being used by consumers and professionals.
Once again, setting up a straw man argument.
 
What about gloss glass?

A bit off topic maybe.. But havent anyone got a response on the glossy glass only issue? For me that one is more important. After all, there is an option for those who wants firewire: buy the old mp or the new mbp.
 
Either Apple didn't do their homework on this one or they are blatantly lying in their excuse. Either way, it's a disappointment.

Firewire 800 is *becoming* the standard for hard drive transfer.
However, Firewire 400 is the standard for video/audio transfer from cameras.


The problem here is Apple computers are supposed to be multi-media. That's the whole bloody point! It's how they are marketed and how they've been designed (thus far).A computer should never dictate your workflow.

The whole thing is very un-Apple like!
 
Fw

I am bewildered as to why apple droopped FW on its new macbooks. I use it all the time for DV cameras and target disk mode. Its not like it would have bene that expensive to add it. I just bought a THREE PORT FW 800 card for my PC for $15! Come on apple enough of the anti-fw propaganda and give the sonsumer what they want.

(ill still probably by a new macbook, but i wont be happy about it)
 
If FireWire is such a dying technology, then wouldt apple have left the FireWire on the lower "consumer" macbooks instead of the "professional" line of MacBooks ?

I think this was done soley for the sake of preventing the pro line from being canabolized.
 
The reason for no-fw.

- "Whats most important on the design of the new portable macs?"
- "That it looks the same as the iPhone and the iMacs, off course!"
- "How do we do that?"
- "Simple, just add a glass plate on top of the screen, black border and so on.."
- "Niiiice.. Shiny! People like that! But whait, then we can't provide anti-glare coating as an option for the pros.. How do we differentiate the pro model from the mb?"
- "Hm.. Remove firewire from mb?"
- "Good thinking! Do it."
 
Not to sound like an arse, but everyone here complaining had planned on buying THIS MacBook? What was wrong with the prior version? No one REMOVED FireWire from your current setup.

You're assuming we have a current setup.
 
The funny thing is that the Nvidia logic board chipset supports firewire with the built in IEEE-1394 controller bus.
 
Apple purportedly censoring their forums

From the MacInTouch Readers Reports

Apparently, Apple doesn't want anybody talking about the lack of FireWire ports on the new MacBooks, because they keep deleting every thread that people are posting about the lack of FireWire ports on the New MacBooks! I was participating in 3 different threads on the Apple Discussion Boards regarding the lack of FireWire from the new MacBooks, and Apple has removed every single thread regarding this topic. There are no threads left on the Apple Discussion Boards regarding this issue. So Apple is censoring their forums once again! Sorry, Apple, but removing the threads from the discussion forum isn't going to prevent people from talking about this very important issue. Below is one of the threads that they removed... there were other threads where people were trying to come up with alternative ideas.

ComputerWorld had mentioned the Firewire thread at Apple's forums in one of their articles printed yesterday.

Within minutes of Apple CEO Steve Jobs wrapping up a launch event in Cupertino, Calif., users started several threads on the company's support forum blasting the omission of a FireWire port on the new MacBook laptop.

"Apple really screwed up with no FireWire port," said Russ Tolman, who inaugurated a thread that by Thursday had collected more than 200 messages and been viewed over 5,000 times.
 
Lately, it seems like the only way to get Apple to budge on anything is to give it bad press. Apple is so frickin' concerned about being green, Steve's suggestion that we go out and get USB devices and chuck our FireWire devices would be harmful to that "green" image wouldn't it?
 
From IT Pro comes the article: No smoke without Firewire
The other big disappointment this week has been Apple’s new MacBooks. They look great, their silicone chippery is a big improvement, pricing less so. But where is the Firewire port? This is no case of form following function, more an accountant’s decision overruling the design department. Apple went through this during the 1990’s when they produced turkeys such as the Colour Classic II, Macintosh TV and Performa 460.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.