Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
As stated previously in this thread, there is no evidence in the letter that Steve is not giving the keynote due to the issues outlined in the letter.

I tend to agree with this so I rewrote the article and title.

arn
 
Read between the lines here folks...

1. "As many of you know, I have been losing weight throughout 2008. The reason has been a mystery to me and my doctors."

Jobs and Apple have been saying for a year that it was nothing significant. NOT knowing the cause of mass weight loss IS significant.

2. "A few weeks ago, I decided that getting to the root cause of this and reversing it needed to become my #1 priority."

Obviously it has grown WORSE since you last saw Steve and finally a few weeks ago became important enough that he had to make fixing the problem his #1 priority. Again while I applaud his decision and assume that the doctor's new diagnosis will help cure the problem, this statement doesn't imply the simple, insignificant issues that Apple and Steve tried to portray for the last year.

A persons health care is a private issue, no doubt. However when the person runs a multi-billion dollar publicly traded company it is inappropriate and ILLEGAL to make false statements that could impact stock price, and that included implying a health issue isn't significant when it is now crystal clear it is.

It would have been decent of you to wish Steve first of all a good recovery and then go on about your shareholder concerns. Because that's the order of priority I see with most of the "folks".
 
People's fundamental rights are not for sale.

Sorry.

Quite right. Jobs is not ethically or legally obligated to discuss his personal health with stockholders, and that's the way it should be. The blogosphere and press are responsible for the fall out from rumors about his health, not him.

If the stock took a hit because Steve appeared a little gaunt, too bad. If you can't roll with the slings and arrows of the market's absurdities, get yourself a nice bond portfolio.

BTW, Agathon, love your name. I know what it means, but what's the significance of it for you?
 
Here, let me put on my mainstream media news filter and see how this press release reads.

Dear Apple Community,
[...]
...I can no longer continue to fulfill my duties as Apple's CEO.
[...]
Steve

Ah, that's much more newsworthy. :D
 
There he said it. He not dying.

He did not say he was not dying. He used his usual song and dance methods, and simply said that others had put him on a deathbed. You then projected that to mean he wasn't dying, which is of course what he knew would happen, whether it is true or not.

Cheers - Kevin
(Three year survivor of esophageal cancer
with similar operations and weight loss)
 
Read between the lines here folks...

1. "As many of you know, I have been losing weight throughout 2008. The reason has been a mystery to me and my doctors."

Jobs and Apple have been saying for a year that it was nothing significant. NOT knowing the cause of mass weight loss IS significant.

2. "A few weeks ago, I decided that getting to the root cause of this and reversing it needed to become my #1 priority."

Obviously it has grown WORSE since you last saw Steve and finally a few weeks ago became important enough that he had to make fixing the problem his #1 priority. Again while I applaud his decision and assume that the doctor's new diagnosis will help cure the problem, this statement doesn't imply the simple, insignificant issues that Apple and Steve tried to portray for the last year.

A persons health care is a private issue, no doubt. However when the person runs a multi-billion dollar publicly traded company it is inappropriate and ILLEGAL to make false statements that could impact stock price, and that included implying a health issue isn't significant when it is now crystal clear it is.

The past year they haven't known what the the problem was.... Therefore how would they be hiding something significant if Steve didn't know it was significant? Also since it is directly related directly to his health...it's not illegal in any way. This isn't like hiding accounting errors or something. CEO's aren't legally required to make their health issues public.
 
Jobs and Apple brands

Dr. Tantillo ('the marketing doctor') did a post back in July on his branding blog, pointing out that Jobs and Apple are two separate--albeit intertwined--brands. He insisted that while Jobs is irreplaceable, he should address the question of succession Now (well, then, in July) to best secure Apple's future--and reassure stockholders. It makes sense to at least have a plan in place.
Full post
 
It is amazing to me that even with these statements that people in here are still pointing fingers and predicting his demise etc. Seriously get over it people! :rolleyes:

Very good news Steve, glad to hear it and wish you well. This brightened up my day. I hope, and I am sure you are pursuing all of the great alternative treatments that are out there! :)
 
Ha Ha - this is Mac Rumors. The rumors will never die until he does.

Are you kidding? Even after he dies (hopefully not for a very long time) there will be rumors that it was all a distraction so he could fade away from the intense spotlight and live a more normal life, alongside the likes of Elvis and Bruce Lee. :D
 
Again, nowhere in either press release does it say that Steve is not appearing at Macworld this year due to his health issues. He is still the CEO of the company. If there are no other reasons behind the keynote change, I would expect that he would give the keynote.

I believe the following statement in Mr. Jobs' letter makes it clear that his health is the reason for him not delivering the keynote:

A few weeks ago, I decided that getting to the root cause of this and reversing it needed to become my #1 priority.

Unlike other sites that only published Mr. Jobs' letter, I chose to publish both his and the board of directors' letter expressing confidence in Mr. Jobs. I believe this provided the most information to the reader. I also stand by my interpretation of Mr. Jobs' letter as his health being the reason for not giving the keynote, though I do regret indicating that he may be absent for all of Macworld as all we currently know is that will not be giving the keynote.
 
Good grief. :rolleyes: Clearly there is more to life than pristine writing skills.

Indeed.

I've seen a lot of grammar nazis come and go over the years, but blimey - sure, seasons are generally not capitalised nowadays, and modern guidelines say not to bother but it's not a crime to do so. It's how it was taught in many schools up until very recently, which is why it's an FAQ. It's all part of the dumbing down of... er I mean "trend to plainer" English.

To avoid straying too far off topic, a further comment: I'm sure they will have plenty of plans in place for when he does eventually go (as we all do). But you never know, all this world domination and being able to spend a fortune on healthcare, as well as technological advancements that he will lead, he'll probably just become a cyborg and live forever :p

Edit: MUCH better title, nicely done arn.
 
I think it was appropriate for him to wait until they had correctly diagnosed the problem before going public with it. Could you have imagined if he had said "I'm losing wait and don't know why.. but I'll still be CEO!", God.

Here's hoping 'Steve is dying' threads die out because of this. ;)

Good point. The stock impact from speculation that somethings is wrong would pale in comparison to something is wrong and we don't have a clue what. It would be chaos. Granted, his and Apple's reputation for complete secrecy didn't help matters, but this was a time when it was best not to say anything until they knew something. If they had kept it secret after knowing something, then there would be a problem.
 
No...

There is legal precedent that a company with knowledge of a health issue of a CEO that could effect their job and company performance must disclose it.

Sorry. A shareholder has a fundamental right too.

He doesn't need to explain anything to us, but for the last year shrugging off his weight loss in public and having Apple PR release statement after statement saying there are no health concerns is flat out illegal.

No, you are simply wrong, factually and legally. Don't make absolutist statements.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.